Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;12:15364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19478-w

Table 5.

Comparison of Fe3O4@SiO2-Im[Br]-SB-Cu (II) with other catalysts in synthesis of tetrazole derivatives.

Entry Catalyst Conditions Time (min) Yield (%)a Refs.
1 Cu (OAC)2 EDS (chcl-urea), 100 °C 720 90 51
2 La/THH-CO2H@Fe3O4 PEG-600, 100 °C 300 90 52
3 Pd‐isatin‐boehmite PEG-400, 120 °C 480 94 53
4 Fe3O4@SiO2-TCT-GA-Cu(II)

Ethylene

glycol/H2O

(1 : 1), 90 °C

90 97 54
5 PDNPs@CS-Zeo DMF, 120 °C 720 90 55
6 Zn-CA-MOFs DMF, 120 °C 480 97 56
7 Cu Nano-catalyst Solvent-free, 100 °C 85 89 57
8 Nano-Fe3O4/In Solvent-free, 100 °C 150 90 58
10 Fe3O4@SiO2-Im[Br]-SB-Cu (II) H2O, 40 °C 20 97 This workb

aIsolated Yield.

bAniline (1.0 mmol), Triethyl orthoformate (1.2 mmol), Sodium azide (1.0 mmol) and Fe3O4@SiO2-Im[Br]-SB-Cu (II) (0.6 mol %, 0.008 g). Benzaldehyde (1.0 mmol), hydroxy amine hydrochloride (1.0 mmol), Sodium azide (1.2 mmol) and Fe3O4@SiO2-Im[Br]-SB-Cu (II) (0.9 mol %, 0.012 g).