Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4;306(4):1135–1146. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06382-3

Table 1.

General characteristics of the study population

Comparison between MM groups and non-MM group Comparison among MM groups
Non-MM BEF p-valuea SUS p-valueb DUR p-valuec BEF versus SUS BEF versus DUR SUS versus DUR
Patient number, n (%) 280 (65.6%) 49 (11.5%) 32 (7.5%) 66 (15.4%)

Age at diagnosis (years)

Median (range)

33.0 (20.0–43.0) 32.0 (18.0–44.0) 0.177 29.0 (24.0–40.0) 0.001 31.0 (25.0–44.0) 0.022 0.093 0.687 0.064

BMI (kg/m2)

Median (range)

24.34 (10.66–51.56) 23.01 (15.94–41.52) 0.130 23.44 (16.38–32.65) 0.084 25.80 (16.80–43.55) 0.013 0.703 0.003 0.004
DM, n (%) 27 (9.6%) 2 (4.1%) 0.320 0 (0.0%) 0.132 6 (9.1%) 0.891 0.671 0.501 0.190
Hypertension, n (%) 63 (22.5%) 6 (12.2%) 0.104 5 (15.6%) 0.372 19 (28.8%) 0.280 0.918 0.033 0.155
IR, n (%) 105 (37.5%) 16 (32.7%) 0.516 9 (28.1%) 0.297 33 (50.0%) 0.062 0.666 0.063 0.040
MS, n (%) 132 (47.1%) 16 (32.7%) 0.060 9 (28.1%) 0.041 36 (54.5%) 0.279 0.666 0.020 0.014

E2 (pg/ml)

Median (range)

55 (4–1237) 55 (12–392) 0.294 54 (8–270) 0.896 52 (2–583) 0.434 0.440 0.773 0.666

T (ng/ml)

Median (range)

0.42 (0.01–2.15) 0.37 (0.02–1.13) 0.582 0.44 (0.01–1.55) 0.273 0.35 (0.01–23.56) 0.391 0.175 0.801 0.130

FSH (mIU/ml)

Median (range)

6.27 (0.56–49.18) 6.87 (1.43–26.67) 0.048 6.21 (1.52–11.87) 0.648 5.87 (0.94–53.00) 0.923 0.267 0.086 0.570

LH (mIU/ml)

Median (range)

5.30 (0.10–389.00) 4.33 (0.20–76.39) 0.912 6.73 (0.22–50.87) 0.262 4.49 (0.53–17.55) 0.606 0.444 0.741 0.160

SHBG (nmol/L)

Median (range)

30.25 (3.50–200.00) 33.50 (13.20–187.70) 0.152 31.20 (9.00–109.70) 0.966 26.45 (6.06–200.00) 0.437 0.271 0.071 0.560
Treatment, n (%) 0.967 0.579 0.052 0.587 0.099 0.479
 MA 154 (55.0%) 26 (53.1%) 20 (62.5%) 38 (57.6%)
 MA + MET 83 (29.6%) 15 (30.6%) 9 (28.1%) 25 (37.9%)
 Otherd 43 (15.4%) 8 (16.3%) 3 (9.4%) 3 (4.5%)
Prevention method 0.100 0.138 0.673 0.261 0.607 0.403
 LNG-IUS 93 (52.5%) 14 (43.8%) 7 (38.9%) 20 (52.6%)
 MPA 24 (13.6%) 1 (3.1%) 2 (11.1%) 3 (7.9%)
 OC 48 (27.1%) 14 (43.8%) 9 (50.0%) 13 (34.2%)
 None 12 (6.8%) 3 (9.4%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (5.3%)
Method for pregnancye, n (%) 0.520 0.139 0.915 0.448 0.871 0.149
 Natural pregnancy 21 (14.2%) 2 (6.3%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (11.4%)
 Ovulation induction 31 (20.9%) 9 (28.1%) 9 (34.7%) 8 (22.9%)
 IVF 79 (53.4%) 18 (56.3%) 14 (53.8%) 20 (57.1%)
 Unknown 17 (11.5%) 3 (9.4%) 3 (11.5%) 3 (8.6%)

MM morular metaplasia, BEF MM before treatment group, SUS sustained MM group, DUR MM during treatment group, BMI body mass index, BMI = weight/height2, DM diabetes mellitus, IR insulin resistance, MS metabolic syndrome, E2 estradiol, T testosterone, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, SHBG sex hormone binding globulin, MA megestrol acetate, 160 mg/day, MET metformin, 1500 mg/day, LNG-IUS levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, MPA medroxyprogesterone acetate, OC oral contraceptive pills, IVF in vitro fertilization

ap-value: difference between BEF and non-MM group

bp-value: difference between SUS and non-MM group

cp-value: difference between DUR and non-MM group

dOther regimen: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), ethinylestradiol cyproterone (Diane-35), or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) plus letrozole

eAmong patients who plan for parenthood