Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 27;21(9):e13683. doi: 10.1111/acel.13683

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Vasorelaxation (% of preconstriction) in aortic rings of WT and Ercc1 Δ/− mice treated either with vehicle or BAY 54–6544 in response to ACh (10−9 to 10−5 Mol/L) (a). The contribution of NO‐cGMP and EDH pathway in WT vehicle (b), WT BAY 54–6544 (c), Ercc1 Δ/− vehicle (d), and Ercc1 Δ/− BAY 54–6544 (e) treated mice. Vasorelaxation (% of preconstriction) in aortic rings of WT and Ercc1 Δ/− mice treated either with vehicle or BAY 54–6544 in response to SNP (10−11 to 10−4 Mol/L) (f) and sGC activator BAY 60–2770 (10−10 to 10−5 Mol/L) (g). Vasorelaxation (% of preconstriction) in aortic rings of vehicle‐treated WT and Ercc1 Δ/− mice in response to sGC stimulator BAY 41–8543 (10−10 to 10−5 Mol/L) (h). Data are presented in mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were analyzed by general linear model repeated measures for A‐H (* = p < 0.05)