Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 19;21(9):e13666. doi: 10.1111/acel.13666

TABLE 1.

Effects of RAPA‐, MET‐, and RAPA/MET‐treatments in type 2 diabetic NcZ10 mice: Body composition and food intake

Group UNT RAPA MET RAPA/MET
BW at sacrifice (g) 42.9 ± 0.8 36.0 ± 1.0*** 44.5 ± 1.2 34.6 ± 0.7***
ΔBW 12–28 wks (g) +8.3 ± 1.0 −1.3 ± 1.1*** +5.9 ± 0.7 −2.3 ± 0.6***
Food intake (kcal/d/kg lean wt) 343 ± 26 418 ± 21 393 ± 25 385 ± 27
EPI fat Wt. (g) 1.18 ± 0.10 1.18 ± 0.09 1.25 ± 0.10 1.06 ± 0.07
EPI fat Wt./BW (%) 2.7 ± 0.2 3.3 ± 0.2 2.8 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.1
ING fat Wt. (g) 0.61 ± 0.09 0.27 ± 0.03** 0.64 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.03**
ING fat Wt./BW (%) 1.5 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.1** 1.4 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1**
Fat mass (g) by DXA 15.5 ± 1.2 10.1 ± 0.9** 14.8 ± 0.7 8.9 ± 0.5**
% Fat by DXA 34.4 ± 1.8 27.1 ± 1.6* 33.0 ± 1.3 24.9 ± 0.6**
Lean mass (g) by DXA 29.5 ± 1.0 26.9 ± 0.5 30.0 ± 0.8 26.8 ± 0.6
% Lean by DXA 65.6 ± 1.8 72.9 ± 1.6* 67.0 ± 1.3 75.0 ± 0.6**
Anus/nose length (cm) 9.7 ± 0.1 9.8 ± 0.1 9.9 ± 0.1 9.6 ± 0.1
BMD (g/cm2) (DXA) 0.055 ± 0.001 0.056 ± 0.001 0.057 ± 0.001 0.055 ± 0.001

Note: Mean ± SE. ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer HSD, significant effects indicated for pairwise comparisons of untreated to treated groups: ***p ≤0.0001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05. N = 9–10 for BW, ΔBW, EPI Wt., EPI Wt./BW, and Anus/nose length; N = 3–4 for ING Wt., ING Wt./BW, Food Intake, and DXA. Untreated = UNT, RAPA‐treated = RAPA, MET‐treated = MET, RAPA/MET‐treated = RAPA/MET.