Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;14:957997. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.957997

TABLE 5.

Accuracy of different models for predicting Parkinson’s disease with major depression.

Model AUC (95%CI) Sensitivity Specificity P
Basic
Age
Disease duration
UPDRS III score
H&Y stage
Subtype of PD
0.847
(0.744–0.950)
68.8% 61.1% <0.001
Basic+
Cortical thickness of seed 1
Cortical thickness of seed 2
0.874
(0.779–0.969)
78.1% 66.6% <0.001
Basic+
FC between seed 1 and right cerebellum posterior lobe
FC between seed 2 and right inferior frontal gyrus and insula
0.904
(0.819–0.989)
87.5% 72.1% <0.001
Full model* 0.927
(0.854–0.999)
93.8% 78.4% <0.001

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval; FC, functional connectivity; H&Y, Hoehn and Yahr scale; UPDRS III, Unified PD Rating Scale part III.

*Full model, combining basic clinical features (age, disease duration, UPDRS III score, H&Y stage, and subtype of PD) with the following neuroimaging biomarkers: cortical thickness of the two seeds and the FC values between seed 1 and the right cerebellum posterior lobe as well as between seed 2 and the right inferior frontal gyrus and insula.