Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;13:969844. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.969844

Table 1.

Decrease in polyunsaturated fatty acid by CRISPR/Cas9.

Gene name Technique Promoter of Cas9 Method Phenotype Oleic acid WT (%) Oleic acid Mutant (%) Mutation type References
AhFAD2A
AhFAD2B
CRISPR/Cas9 CamV 35S Hairy root transformation - 36 ~ 67% Not harvest the seeds G448A (ahFAD2A), +1 bp, and G451T (ahFAD2B) Yuan et al., 2019
NtFAD2-2 CRISPR/Cas9 CamV 35S Agrobacterium-mediated transformation No side effect ~12% 79% -1 and −5 bp Tian et al., 2020a
AtFAD2 Base editing RPS5A (Arabidopsis) Floral dipping Resistance to salt stress 18.5% 57.9% A295G, D298E Park et al., 2021
64.7% A295V, T296M
30.6% A295V
29.6% A295G
CRISPR/Cas9 CamV 35S Floral dipping - 16.2% ~59.8% +1 bp Jiang et al., 2017
BnFAD2 CRISPR/Cas9 Ubiquitin4-2 (Petroselinum crispum) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation No difference cv. Westar(74.6%) BnFAD2_Aa (80%) -4 bp Okuzaki et al., 2018
Ubiquitin (rice) cv. J9707
(66.7%)
BnaFAD2.A5 (73.1–82.3%) −1bp, −1bp and S1, −2bp, −13bp, −80bp, +1bp, +1bp and +1bp, +1bp and −2bp, +1bp and −7bp Huang et al., 2020
BnaFAD2.C5 (73–74%) −3 and +1 bp
CsFAD2 CRISPR/Cas9 Ubiquitin4-2 (Petroselinum crispum) Floral dipping All CsFAD2 gene mutants
→ slow growth, twisted leaves, delayed bolting
cv. Celine
(9.8%)
10–62% 21 different mutant alleles Morineau et al., 2017
CamV 35S - cv. Suneson
(15.9%)
~54.7% A lot of mutant alleles Jiang et al., 2017
EC1.2 All CsFAD2 gene mutants → Stunted bushy phenotype, small, and bloomed late cv. Suneson
(9.8%)
~59.5% A lot of mutant alleles Lee et al., 2021
GhFAD2-1A
GhFAD2-1D
CRISPR/Cas9 Ubiquitin (rice) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation No difference (Fibre quality/length/strength, micronaire, and germination) 13.9% 75.3–77.7% m1-1 (−41 and +1 bp)
m1-2 (+1 and −1 bp)
m1-3 (+1 and +1 bp)
m20-2 (−1 and +1 bp)
m27-3 (−374 bp)
Chen et al., 2021
TaFAD2 CRISPR/Cas9 Ubiquitin4-2 (Petroselinum crispum) Floral dipping Late flowering, shorter plant height, low seed weight per plant, and low germination 12% ~35% fad2-4 (−2 bp)
fad2-5 (+1 bp)
fad2-6 (−29 bp)
Jarvis et al., 2021
OsFAD2-1 CRISPR/Cas9 Ubiquitin1 (maize) Biolistic transformation - Oryza sativa Japonica
(No result)
No result +1 bp
-302 bp
Bahariah et al., 2021
2x 35S Agrobacterium-mediated transformation No difference Oryza sativa cv. Nipponbare
(32%)
~80% 1–1 (+1 bp)
3–11 (+1 bp)
5–17 (−8 bp)
6–23 (−8 bp)
Abe et al., 2018
GmFAD2 CRISPR/Cas9 e35S Agrobacterium-mediated transformation - cv. JN38
(17.34%)
GmFAD2-2 (45.08–65.9%) Substitution, −2, −3, +1, and +2 bp Al Amin et al., 2019
tipA Agrobacterium-mediated transformation No difference in plant height and grain weight.
The grain is smaller and deeper in color
cv. JN38
(19.15%)
g3 strain (34.47%)
g6 strain
(40.45%)
g36 strain
(72.02%)
GmFAD2-1A
JN38g3–1 (+1 bp 66.7%)
JN38g3–3 (−1 bp 16.6%)
JN38g3–4 (−2 bp 16.7%)
GmFAD2-2A
JN38g6–2 (+1 bp 50%)
JN38g6–3 (−1 bp 50%)
Double
JN38g36–3
(+1 and −1 bp 50%)
JN38g36–5
(−2 and −7 bp 50%)
Wu et al., 2020
2x 35S Hairy root transformation - cv. Maverick (~20%) GmFAD2-1A, GmFAD2-1B
homozygous lines (~80%)
A lot of mutant alleles Do et al., 2019