Table 3.
Gene name | Technique |
Promoter
of Cas9 |
Method | Phenotype |
Fatty acid
WT (%) |
Fatty acid
Mutant (%) |
Mutation type | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CsDGAT1 | CRISPR/Cas9 | CaMV 35S | Floral dipping | Wrinkled and darker seeds, lower oil content |
cv. Suneson18:2, 18:3 (22.8, 28.0%) |
18:2, 18:3 D4 (25.1, 27.6%) D5 (29.7, 25.8%) |
D4,D5 –DGAT1 homozygous mutant | Aznar-Moreno and Durrett, 2017 |
CsPDAT1 | Similar to wild type | P1,P3 – PDAT1 homozygous mutant | ||||||
AtGPAT1 | CRISPR/Cas9 | CaMV 35S | Floral dipping | Increased the plant height and decreased the seed oil contents Increased the cell length |
- | Saturated fatty acids are reduced MUFAs increase |
−26 bp | Bai et al., 2021 |
BnLPAT2 | CRISPR/Cas9 | 2x 35S | Agrobacterium-mediated hypocotyl transformation | Seed weight decreases, seeds are wrinkled, oil bodies increase | - | Oil content decreases | A lot of mutant alleles | Zhang et al., 2019b |
BnLPAT5 | ||||||||
TaROD1 | CRISPR/Cas9 | Ubiquitin4-2 (Petroselinum crispum) | Floral dipping | No difference | 18:1 (12%) 18:2 (18%) |
18:1 (~23%) 18:2 (~9%) |
rod1-3 (−18 bp) rod1-4 (+1 bp) rod1-5 (+1 bp) |
Jarvis et al., 2021 |
OsPLDα1 | CRISPR/Cas9 | Ubiquitin |
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation |
Phytic acid content Xidao#1 (9.1 mg/g) osplda1-1 (8.2 mg/g) osplda1-2(8.14 mg/g) |
osplda1-1 (−2 bp) osplda1-2 (−1 bp) |
Khan et al., 2019 | ||
Amylose content, pasting properties, and retrogradation properties differ compared to wild type | Khan et al., 2020 | |||||||
GmpPLA-IIε GmpPLA-IIζ | CRISPR/Cas9 | Not mentioned |
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation |
Knockout mutant is tolerant to iron-deficient condition, droughts, and flooding. |
ppla-IIε/ppla-IIζ-1 (−1 bp, −26 bp) ppla-IIε/ppla-IIζ-2 (+1 bp, −4 bp) ppla-IIε/ppla-IIζ-3 (−139 bp, larger –bp and + bp) ppla-IIε-1 (−14 bp) ppla-IIε-2 (−4 bp) ppla-IIζ-1 (−7 bp) |
Xiao et al., 2021 |