Table 4.

Relevance of newly found videos by the number of links to the original set of colonoscopy videos (total degree).

Total degreea	Count of videos with total degree, N	Number of videos coded as “relevant” (relevancy), n (%)	Cumulative count of nonduplicate videos, N	Cumulative count of nonduplicate relevant videos, n	Cumulative precisionb (%)	Cumulative recallc, (%)	Cumulative F1-scored, (%)
44	1	1 (100)	1	1	100	2.7	5.3
41	1	1 (100)	2	2	100	5.4	10.3
26	1	1 (100)	3	3	100	8.1	15.0
23	1	1 (100)	4	4	100	10.8	19.5
22	1	1 (100)	5	5	100	13.5	23.8
21	1	1 (100)	6	6	100	16.2	27.9
20	2	2 (100)	8	8	100	21.6	35.6
19	1	1 (100)	9	9	100	24.3	39.1
18	1	1 (100)	10	10	100	27.0	42.6
17	2	2 (100)	12	12	100	32.4	49.0
16	1	1 (100)	13	13	100	35.1	52.0
15	2	2 (100)	15	15	100	40.5	57.7
14	1	1 (100)	16	16	100	43.2	60.4
13	1	1 (100)	17	17	100	45.9	63.0
12	2	2 (100)	19	19	100	51.4	67.9
11	2	2 (100)	21	21	100	56.8	72.4
10	1	1 (100)	22	22	100	59.5	74.6
9	1	1 (100)	23	23	100	62.2	76.7
7	2	1 (50)	25	24	96	64.9	77.4
6	1	1 (100)	26	25	96	67.6	79.4
5	2	0 (0)	28	25	89	67.6	76.9
4	2	2 (100)	30	27	90	73.0	80.6
3	2	1 (50)	32	28	88	75.7	81.2
2	5	1 (20)	37	29	78	78.4	78.4
1	5	1 (20)	42	30	71	81.1	75.9
0	71	7 (10)	113	37	33	100	49.3

^aThe sum of connections each new video has with the videos in the original colonoscopy video set.

^bThe cumulative count of relevant videos divided by the cumulative count of all videos.

^cCumulative count of relevant videos divided by the total number of new and nonduplicate 37 relevant videos.

^dThe harmonic mean of cumulative precision and cumulative recall.