Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 25;45(9):2103–2110. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2502

Table 1.

Participant characteristics

Type 1 diabetes + NAH Type 1 diabetes + IAH Type 2 diabetes Type 2 control subjects Type 1 control subjects
Participants, n 26 21 15 16 16
Male 13 (50.0) 10 (47.6) 9 (60.0) 9 (56.3) 7 (43.8)
Age, years 35.0 [22.3–63.3] 59.0 [48.5–63.0]* 62.0 [55.0–68.0]* 57.0 [52.3–61.8]* 47.5 [24.5–64.5]**
EQF 4.6 ± 1.6 4.6 ± 1.7 4.6 ± 1.4 4.6 ± 1.4 5.7 ± 1.2
Diabetes duration, years 19.8 ± 15.2 25.4 ± 11.3 15 ± 7.7
HbA1c, mmol/mol 60.6 ± 9.9 62.8 ± 10.1 63.5 ± 11.2 35.6 ± 2.2 33.6 ± 3.5
HbA1c, % 7.7 ± 0.9 7.9 ± 0.9 8.0 ± 1.0 5.4 ± 0.2 5.2 ± 0.3
BMI, kg/m2 26.7 ± 3.6 26.2 ± 3.8 29.0 ± 4.3 28.0 ± 4.4 22.6 ± 2.8
Diabetes complications 5 (19.2) 9 (42.9) 3 (20.0)
 Retinopathy, n 5 7 2
 Neuropathy, n 3 6 2
 Nephropathy, n 0 1 1
Glucose-lowering medication
 Oral 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 11 (73.3)
 CSII 11 (42.3) 10 (47.6) 1 (6.7)
 MDI 15 (57.7) 11 (52.4) 14 (93.3)
 Insulin dose, IU/day 53.6 ± 23.0 45.7 ± 23.8 71.3 ± 54.6

Data are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, or median [interquartile range] unless otherwise indicated. CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; MDI, multiple daily injections.

*

P < 0.05 vs. type 1 diabetes + NAH.

**

P < 0.05 vs. type 2 diabetes.

P < 0.05 vs. both control groups.

§

P < 0.05 vs. type 1 diabetes + NAH.

P < 0.05 vs. type 1 diabetes + IAH.

P < 0.05 vs. type 1 control subjects.