Table 3.
Summary of scores on EBL Critical Appraisal Checklist for included studies.
| Included Studies with Descriptive Data on Family Violence Occurence |
Included Studies on Factors Associated with Family Violence Occurence |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBL Checklist Items | Barboza, et al., 202045 | Dapic, et al., 202043 | McLay, 202046 | Musser, et al., 202147 | Rapoport, et al., 202048 | Whelan, et al., 202049 | Chong, et al., 202050 | Holland, et al., 202151 | Kaiser, et al., 202152 | Swedo, et al., 202053 | Hamadani, et al., 202054 | Kimura, et al., 202155 | Mahmood, et al., 202156 | Malkawi, et al., 202157 | #1 Rodriguez, et al., 202158 | #2 Rodriguez, et al., 202158 | Saji, et al., 202144 | Shah, et al., 202141 | Sharma, et al., 202159 | Tierolf, et al., 202160 | Bérubé, et al., 202061 | Calvano, et al., 202162 | Chung, et al., 202063 | Lawson, et al., 202064 | Lee, et al., 202165 | Manja, et al., 202042 | Pinchoff, et al., 202166 | Wong, et al., 202167 | Xu, et al., 202068 |
| Is the study population representative of all users, actual and eligible, who might be included in the study? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | X | √ | X | √ | X | X | X | X | √ | √ | X | X | X | X | √ | X | X |
| Are inclusion and exclusion criteria definitively outlined? | √ | X | √ | √ | X | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | X | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| Is the sample size large enough for sufficiently precise estimates? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | X | √ | √ | X | √ | X | √ | √ | X | X | X | X | √ | X | X |
| Is the response rate large enough for sufficiently precise estimates? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| Is the choice of population bias-free? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| If a comparative study…(multiple questions) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Was informed consent obtained? | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| Are data collection methods clearly described? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| If a face-to-face survey, were inter-observer and intra-observer bias reduced? | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | √ | n/a | n/a |
| Is the data collection instrument validated? | X | X | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ |
| If based on regularly collected statistics, are the statistics free from subjectivity? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | X | √ | X | X |
| Does the study measure the outcome at a time appropriate for capturing the intervention's effect? | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | √ | X | X | X | X | X | √ | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Is the instrument included in the publication? | √ | X | X | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ |
| Are questions posed clearly enough to be able to elicit precise answers? | X | X | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Were those involved in data collection not involved in delivering a service to the target population? | X | X | √ | √ | X | √ | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Is the study type / methodology utilized appropriate? | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Is there face validity? | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Is the research methodology clearly stated at a level of detail that would allow its replication? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| Was ethics approval obtained? | X | X | X | X | X | X | √ | X | X | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | X | X | √ | √ | X |
| Are the outcomes clearly stated and discussed in relation to the data collection? | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Are all the results clearly outlined? | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Are confounding variables accounted for? | √ | X | √ | √ | X | X | X | X | X | X | √ | √ | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | √ | √ | X | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| Do the conclusions accurately reflect the analysis? | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Is subset analysis a minor, rather than a major, focus of the article? | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Are suggestions provided for further areas to research? | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Is there e√ternal validity? | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ | √ | X | √ | √ | √ |
| Total (%) | 75 | 29 | 83 | 83 | 64 | 67 | 75 | 75 | 79 | 79 | 92 | 96 | 75 | 88 | 79 | 79 | 71 | 58 | 88 | 79 | 79 | 88 | 79 | 75 | 86 | 42 | 92 | 76 | 79 |