Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 1;16(9):e0010723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010723

Table 4. Patients complaints related to the oral cavity that could not be explained medically.

Russell’s viper
(n1 = 93)
(n2 = 67)
Merrem’s Hump-nosed viper
(n1 = 49)
(n2 = 49)
Indian krait
(n1 = 12)
(n2 = 5)
Common cobra
(n1 = 0)
(n2 = 2)
Identified non/mildly venomous snakes
(n1 = 15)
(n2 = 19)
Snake unidentified
(n1 = 30)
(n2 = 26)
All
(n1 = 199)
(n2 = 168)
Teeth loosening: n, (%) Group I 9 (10%) 6 (12%) 0 0 0 2 (7%) 17 (9%)
Group II 5 (7%) 1 (2%) 0 0 0 0 6 (4%)
Avulsed teeth: n, (%) Group I 10 (11%) 4 (8%) 0 0 0 3 17 (9%)
Group II 5 (7%) 0 0 0 0 0 5 (3%)
Brittle teeth: n, (%) Group I 8 (9%) 5 (10%) 0 0 0 1 (3%) 14 (7%)
Group II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Receding gums: n, (%) Group I 3 (3%) 2 (4%) 0 0 0 0 5 (3%)
Group II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Teeth sensitivity: (%) Group I 2 (2%) 0 0 0 0 0 2 (1)%
Group II 3 (4%) 0 0 0 0 0 3 (2%)

n1, number of patients in group I; n2, number of patients in group II