Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;17(9):e0274334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274334

Table 1. Prevalence of complementary medicine use in the past 12 months according to the self-completed questionnaire from the Swiss Health Survey 2012 and 2017.

2017 (N = 18,832a) 2012 (N = 18,357a) p-value
N (unweighted %) weighted % (95% CI) N (unweighted %) weighted % (95% CI)
Any type of complementary medicineb 5654 (30.3%) 28.9% (28.1–29.7) 5018 (27.5%) 24.7% (23.9–25.4) <0.001
Osteopathy 1930 (10.3%) 9.5% (9.0–10.0) 1459 (8.1%) 6.8% (6.4–7.2) <0.001
Naturopathy 1799 (9.6%) 8.8% (8.3–9.0) 1597 (8.8%) 7.7% (7.2–8.2) 0.003
Homeopathy 1731 (9.3%) 8.4% (8.0–8.9) 1662 (9.2%) 8.2% (7.7–8.7) 0.68
Herbal medicine 1369 (7.3%) 7.0% (6.6–7.4) 1014 (5.6%) 5.0% (4.6–5.4) <0.001
Other therapies (kinesiology, Feldenkrais, autogenic training, neural therapy, bioresonance therapy, anthroposophic medicine) 1323 (7.1%) 6.9% (6.5–7.4) 1242 (6.9%) 6.1% (5.7–6.6) 0.32
Acupuncture 1120 (6.0%) 5.9% (5.5–6.3) 1007 (5.6%) 4.9% (4.5–5.3) 0.06
Shiatsu/reflexology 884 (4.7%) 4.5% (4.2–4.9) 863 (4.8%) 4.3% (4.0–4.7) 0.95
Traditional Chinese medicine (excluding acupuncture) 472 (2.5%) 2.5% (2.2–2.8) 391 (2.2%) 1.9% (1.7–2.2) 0.02
Ayurveda 221 (1.2%) 1.1% (1.0–1.3) 202 (1.1%) 0.9% (0.8–1.1) 0.52

N, number; CI, confidence interval

aRepresentative sample of the general population > 15 years old in Switzerland

b Participants who used at least one complementary medicine therapy in the past 12 months.