Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;13:974683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974683

Table 5.

Pooled correlations between collective effervescence on factors conductive to collective action in demonstrations.

Effect sizes
Factors conductive to collective action k N r (95% CI) Interpretation
Group identification 7 576 0.517 (0.376, 0.657) Large
Collective efficacy 3 342 0.371 (0.209, 0.533) Large
Negative emotions (e.g., anger) 8 755 0.139 (0.004, 0.273) Small
Self-transcendent emotions (e.g., awe) 9 3,516 0.582 (0.468, 0.695) Large
Morality (self-transcendent beliefs)a 2 3,338 0.434 (0.046, 0.823) Large

k is the number of studies and N the number of participants included in the analysis. r and (95% CI) indicate pooled Pearson's rs and their 95% confidence intervals. Factors conductive to collective action are integrated from the present article as well as different reviews (e.g., Agostini and van Zomeren, 2021; Akfirat et al., 2021). a While the analysis shows a large pooled effects size (as well in the direct affects), this relationship should be taken with cation due to the small amount of studies (i.e., k = 2).