Table 2. Baseline characteristic of the 12 included studies.
Code | Title | First author | Study design | Study population | Age (mean ± SD) | Surgery method | Follow-up (y) | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lumbar spinal stenosis: Which predictive factors of favorable functional results after decompressive laminectomy | E. Foulongne | Prospective cohort | 98 (94 M, 4 F) | 67.3 ± 8.8 | Decompressive laminectomy in lumbar stenosis | 5 | Walking distance, reoperation rate, complication |
2 | Long-term follow-up of revision decompressive lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients | Shay Shabat | Retrospective cohort | 31 | > 65 | Lumbar decompressive spinal surgery | 10 | Pain, reoperation rate, patient's satisfaction |
3 | 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery | Alex D. Malter | Population-based cohort study | 6,376 (3,764 M, 2,612 F) | 48 | Lumbar surgery | 5 | Reoperation rate, complication |
4 | Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis | Tetsuhiro Iguchi | Retrospective cohort | 151 | 60 | Decompressive laminectomy | 10 | Back pain, leg pain, neurogenic claudication, patient's satisfaction, multilevel laminectomy |
5 | Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study | Chi Heon Kim | Retrospective cohort | 8,795 (55.6 F, 44.4 M) | 56.7 ± 12.1 | Decompression without fusion (laminectomy and/or discectomy) | 6 | Reoperation rate, complication |
6 | Short-term and long-term revision rates after lumbar spine discectomy versus laminectomy: a population-based cohort study | Feng-Chen Kao | Retrospective cohort | 66,754 (47.88 F, 52.11 M) | 59.91 ± 14.02 | Laminectomy | 5 | Reoperation rate |
7 | Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis | M.U. Lehto | Retrospective cohort | 96 (50 M, 46 F) | 59 | Laminectomy | 5.5 | Satisfaction, multilevel laminectomy, complication |
8 | The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years | Yuchiao Chang | Prospective observational cohort | 144 (54 M, 90 F) | 65 | LSS | 10 | Pain, disability, reoperation rate, patient's satisfaction |
9 | Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion | Anne F. Mannion | Prospective cohort | 143 (92 M, 51 F) | 64 | Lumbar decompression surgery without fusion | 5 | Leg pain and back pain intensity, self-rated disability, reoperation rates |
10 | Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial (sport) | Jon D. Lurie | Randomized trial with a concurrent observational cohort study | 654 (385 M, 249 F) | 64 | Decompressive laminectomy | 8 | Patient's satisfaction, reoperation rate, complication |
11 | Clinical and radiological outcomes following microscopic decompression utilizing tubular retractor or conventional microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with a minimum of 10-year follow-up | Gun Woo Lee | Retrospective cohort | 102 | 56 | Lumbar spinal stenosis | 10 | Pain, disability, walking distance, reoperation rate |
12 | Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis | Steven J. Atlas | Prospective observational cohort | 148 | 65 | LSS | 10 | Patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, disability, reoperation rate, patient's satisfaction |
Abbreviations: F, female; LLS, lumbar spinal stenosis; M, male; SD, standard deviation.