Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar 31;26(6):1119–1131. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05295-z

Table 3.

Operative details

Variable Age < 75 Age 75 + Overall p-value
Number of patients 979 156 1135

Surgical technique 0.02
 McKeown 479 (48.93%) 62 (39.74%) 541 (47.67%)
 Ivor Lewis 482 (49.23%) 87 (55.77%) 569 (50.13%)
 Transhiatal 12 (1.23%) 3 (1.92%) 15 (1.32%)
 Thoracoabdominal 6 (0.61%) 4 (2.56%) 10 (0.88%)
Overall approach 0.718
 Total MIE 645 (65.88%) 107 (68.59%) 752 (66.26%)
 Open 176 (17.98%) 24 (15.38%) 200 (17.62%)
 Hybrid 158 (16.14%) 25 (16.03%) 183 (16.12%)
Thoracic approacha 0.696
 Minimally Invasive 642 (65.58%) 107 (68.59%) 749 (65.99%)
 Thoracotomy 289 (29.52%) 43 (27.56%) 332 (29.25%)
 Robotic 48 (4.90%) 6 (3.85%) 54 (4.76%)
Abdominal approach 0.713
 Minimally invasive 642 (65.58%) 107 (68.59%) 749 (65.99%)
 Laparotomy 289 (29.52%) 43 (27.56%) 332 (29.25%)
 Robotic 48 (4.90%) 6 (3.85%) 54 (4.76%)
Convert to open surgeryb 0.154
 None 905 (94.86%) 142 (94.04%) 1047 (94.75%)
 Thoracic portion only 26 (2.73%) 2 (1.32%) 28 (2.53%)
 Abdominal portion only 18 (1.89%) 4 (2.65%) 22 (1.99%)
 Both thoracic and abdominal portions 5 (0.52%) 3 (1.99%) 8 (0.72%)

SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, MIE minimally invasive esophagectomy (includes video-assisted or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery)

a

Out of N = 1119

b

Out of N = 1105