Skip to main content
. 2022 May 26;52(10):2523–2535. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01699-8

Table 2.

PEDro scale of the included studies

Study Inclusion criteriaa Random allocation Concealed allocation Similarity at baseline Subject blinding Therapist blinding Assessor blinding  > 85% follow-up Intention-to-treat analysis Between-group comparison Point estimates and variability Total
Boguszewski et al. [65] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Guillott et al. [37] 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Hodgson et al. [26] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Junker and Stöggl [55] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Junker and Stöggl [58] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Kiyono et al. [27] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Le Gal et al. [45] 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Li et al. [56] 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
Miller and Rockey [66] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Sandrey et al. [46] 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Stovern et al. [38] 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5

PEDro Physiotherapy Evidence Database

aWas not counted for the final score; 1 = one point awarded; 0 = no points awarded