Table 2.
Residual hearing outcomes obtained in the current study compared to the results obtained in the previous study by Heutink et al. (CS), as well as specifically for participants in whom the electrode array located in the scala tympani (ST) and those with a translocated electrode array [4]
eRW (current study) | CS (Heutink et al.) | CS–ST (Heutink et al.) | CS–Translocation (Heutink et al.) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | N | Mean (SD) | N | p value | Mean (SD) | N | p value | Mean (SD) | N | p value | |
Preoperative LFPTA1 in dB | 81.5 (11.9) | 23 | 92.2 (13.3) | 19 | 0.009 | 94.9 (10.7) | 12 | 0.003 | 87.1 (19) | 7 | 0.296 |
Postoperative threshold shift in LFPTA in dB | 16.2 (10.8) | 22 | 9.2 (9.2) | 17 | 0.039 | 4.4 (5.3) | 11 | 0.002 | 17.9 (9) | 6 | 0.723 |
RHP% as per Skarzynski2 | 43.9 (34.8) | 22 | 56.9 (46.3) | 17 | 0.269 | 77.2 (45) | 11 | 0.022 | 19.8 (16) | 6 | 0.042 |
aOne `participant (#10) was excluded from hearing outcome analysis due to a tip fold-over
1Low frequency pure tone average: average threshold for 250, 500 and 1000 Hz
2Residual hearing preservation,