Table 3.
Overview of comparable literature
| Study | Year | Number of patients | Implants cup | Implants stem | General accuracy cup (exact size ± 1 size) | General accuracy stem (exact size ± 1 size) | Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holzer et. al. [1] | 2019 | 632 |
Allofit® Pinnacle® |
Alloclassic® Corail® |
78% (n = 494) | 87% (n = 547) | EndoMap software® system (Siemens Medical Solutions AG, Erlangen, Germany) |
| Eggli et. al. [2] | 1998 | 100 | n.a | Müller® straight | 90% (n = 90) | 92% (n = 92) | Software developed by Maurice E. Müller Foundation (Bern, Switzerland) and by Department of Bioengineering Clemson University (South Carolina, USA) |
| Davila et. al. [7] | 2006 | 36 | Pinnacle® | Summit® | 86% (n = 31) | 72% (n = 26) | EndoMap® software system (Siemens Medical Solutions AG, Erlangen, Germany) |
| Gamble et. al. [12] | 2010 | 40 | Trident® |
Accolade® Omnifit® |
80% (n = 32) | 85% (n = 34) | OrthoView® software (version 2.0CEN, Meridian Technique Ltd, Southampton, United Kingdom) |
| Shaarani et. al. [13] | 2013 | 100 | Trident® | Accolade® | 80% (n = 80) | 98% (n = 98) | OrthoView® software (version 2.0CEN, Meridian Technique Ltd, Southampton, United Kingdom) |
| Whiddon et. al. [26] | 2011 | 51 | Trident® |
Secur-Fit Max® Accolade® |
78% (n = 40) | 90% (n = 46) | Impax® digital templating software (Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium) |
| Wiese et. al. [29] | 2020 | 56 | Pinnacle® | Summit® | 71% (n = 40) | 79% (n = 44) | Impax Orthopaedic Tools® software (Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium) |
| Carter et. al. [38]a | 1995 | 74 | – | Osteonics® | – | 82–96% (n = 61–71) | n.a |
| Efe et. al. [39] | 2011 | 169 |
EP-FIT-PLUS® Wagner® |
Polar® Proxy Plus® |
78% (n = 132) | 82% (n = 139) | MediCAD® software (version 2.06, mediCAD Hectec GmbH, Altdorf/Landshut, Germany) |
aOnly accuracy of implanted stems was investigated. Accuracy between less ore more experienced surgeons was compared, no overall accuracy