Table III.
Characteristics of studies on mental health of environmental services workers (arranged alphabetically)
| Author, year | Country | Study design | Study population and sample size (N) | Key findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan, 2022 [31] | USA | Qualitative study; semi-structured telephone interviews | Environmental services workers (69% females; average age 51 years), N=16 | The COVID-19 pandemic worsened the existing stressors facing environmental services workers, and there is a need for more support (training, education and adequate PPE) and recognition for these front-line workers. |
| Latha, 2022 [32] | India | Cross-sectional study | Housekeeping staff, N=64 | Based on self-reported DASS-21 and IES-R scores, hospital housekeeping staff had high levels of depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms during and after lockdown. Housekeeping staff had the highest levels of anxiety, and this worsened after lockdown. |
| Tamene, 2022 [33] | Ethiopia | Qualitative study; key informant interviews and one-on-one in-depth interviews | Environmental services workers, N=19 | There were concerns regarding a lack of sufficient and appropriately-sized PPE in the workplace; poor renumeration; increased work fatigue; and lack of experience and training dealing with potential hazards. |
DASS-21, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21; IES-R, Impact of Event Scale-revised; PPE, personal protective equipment.