Table 3.
Cox proportional hazard models for DRFS and BCSS.
| DRFS | BCSS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Univariate models HR (95% CI) | P | Multivariable model HR (95% CI) | P | Univariate models HR (95% CI) | P | Multivariable model HR (95% CI) | P |
| Age | 0.98 (0.94–1.01) | 0.13 | 0.98 (0.95–1.02) | 0.36 | 0.99 (0.96–1.02) | 0.43 | 1.00 (0.96–1.04) | 0.98 |
| Tumor size | 0.003 | 0.30 | 0.002 | 0.97 | ||||
| pT2 vs. pT1 | 2.44 (1.46–4.09) | 0.001 | 1.41 (0.77–2.58) | 0.27 | 2.47 (1.46–4.17) | 0.001 | 1.08 (0.56–2.07) | 0.83 |
| pT3 vs. pT1 | 1.35 (0.18–10.00) | 0.77 | 0.41 (0.05–3.43) | 0.41 | 3.05 (0.72–12.97) | 0.13 | 0.98 (0.19–5.19) | 0.98 |
| Nodal status | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||||
| 1–3 vs. 0 nodes | 1.64 (0.85–3.17) | 0.14 | 1.17 (0.56–2.43) | 0.68 | 1.61 (0.82–3.15) | 0.16 | 1.25 (0.58–2.70) | 0.57 |
| 4–10 vs. 0 nodes | 6.24 (3.25–11.95) | <0.0001 | 5.31 (2.59–10.87) | <0.0001 | 5.84 (2.97–11.48) | <0.0001 | 4.48 (2.00–10.00) | 0.0003 |
| >10 vs. 0 nodes | 7.81 (3.58–17.04) | <0.0001 | 11.16 (4.21–29.60) | <0.0001 | 9.45 (4.55–19.62) | <0.0001 | 10.27 (3.63–29.08) | <0.0001 |
| Tumor grade | 0.15 | 0.50 | 0.03 | 0.64 | ||||
| G2 vs. G1 | 1.84 (0.82–4.13) | 0.14 | 1.71 (0.70–4.16) | 0.24 | 1.59 (0.70–3.59) | 0.27 | 1.38 (0.56–3.41) | 0.49 |
| G3 vs. G1 | 2.39 (0.99–5.72) | 0.05 | 1.56 (0.54–4.50) | 0.42 | 2.76 (1.18–6.45) | 0.02 | 1.67 (0.58–4.82) | 0.34 |
| HER2 | 1.86 (0.91–3.82) | 0.09 | 1.93 (0.92–4.07) | 0.08 | 2.59 (1.32–5.09) | 0.006 | 2.88 (1.39–5.98) | 0.004 |
| ESR1 amp/gain | 0.53 (0.31–0.89) | 0.02 | 0.48 (0.26–0.91) | 0.02 | 0.56 (0.34–0.95) | 0.03 | 0.47 (0.27–0.80) | 0.01 |