Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;9:960194. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.960194

TABLE 1.

Comparison of hydrophobicity scales that will be used in the present work.

Scale Resolution Principle Notes References
Bandyopadhyay-Methler Residue Local environment, Rekker coefficients (Rekker and Kort, 1979) Bandyopadhyay and Mehler (2008)
Black-Mould Residue Rekker coefficients (Rekker and Kort, 1979) Black and Mould (1991)
Eisenberg Residue Consensus of 5 previous scales Eisenberg et al. (1982)
Jain Residue HIC retention Jain et al. (2017a)
Kyte-Doolittle Residue Consensus of ΔG (water—vapor) and surface accessibility Kyte and Doolittle (1982)
Meek Residue RP-HPLC retention At pH 7.4 Meek (1980)
Miyazawa Residue Surface accessibility Miyazawa and Jernigan (1985)
Rose Residue Fraction of surface area buried while folding Eisenberg et al. (1982), Rose et al. (1985)
Wimley-White Residue ΔG (water—lipid bilayer) Interface Scale Wimley and White (1996)
Crippen Atomic LogP of small molecules Wildman and Crippen (1999)
Eisenberg-dG Atomic Surface accessibility Eisenberg and Mclachlan (1986)