Table 6.
Macro accuracy results of the winning classifiers for each of the considered models.
| Exercise type | Macro accuracy/winning classifier | ||||||
|
|
Total score | Component 1 | Component 2 | Component 3 | Component 4 | Component 5 | Component 6 |
| Sitting 1 and sitting 2 | 0.90/Gaussian process | 0.88/Gaussian process | 0.90/kNNa | 0.89/Gaussian process | N/Ab | N/A | N/A |
| Sitting 3 | 0.87/Gaussian process | 0.86/Neural network | 0.91/Gaussian process | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Standing 1 and standing 2 | 0.85/Gaussian process | 0.83/Gaussian process | 0.86/Gaussian process | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Standing 3 (progressions 0-1) | 0.91/kNN | 0.91/Gaussian process | 0.92/Gaussian process | 0.89/kNN | 0.90/Random forest | N/A | N/A |
| Standing 3 (progression 2) | 0.87/SVMc (linear) | 0.89/Gaussian process | 0.90/Naïve Bayes | 0.88/Random forest | 0.91/kNN | N/A | N/A |
| Standing 3 (progression 3) | 0.91/Random forest | 0.90/AdaBoost | 0.88/Neural network | 0.86/kNN | 0.89/kNN | N/A | N/A |
| Standing 4 | 0.92/Gaussian process | 0.86/Gaussian process | 0.88/Gaussian process | 0.80/kNN | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Walking 1 | 0.90/Random forest | 0.81/Gaussian process | 0.85/Random forest | 0.92/Random forest | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Walking 2 and walking 3 | 0.81/kNN | 0.74/kNN | 0.75/SVM (linear) | 0.78/SVM (RBFd) | 0.71/kNN | 0.75/SVM (RBF) | 0.75/kNN |
akNN: k-nearest neighbors.
bN/A: not applicable.
cSVM: support vector machine.
dRBF: radial basis function.