Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr 18;27(9):1212–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.04.007

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Expected number of false negatives (ENFNs) at different test characteristics and prevalence for two-stage hierarchical pool testing (S2), three-stage hierarchical pool testing (S3), matrix-based non-hierarchical pool testing (M2), and matrix-based non-hierarchical pool testing with initial master pool (M2m). (A) Expected number of false negatives as a function of pool size, k, at two different prevalence rates,1% and 10% (first two panels), and as a function of prevalence (third panel) under realistic test characteristics with 70% sensitivity and 100% specificity. (B) Expected number of false negatives under perfect test characteristics at two different prevalence rates, 1% and 10% (first two panels), and as a function of prevalence (third panel). With perfect sensitivity and specificity, the number of false negatives is zero. Here the total number of samples is 100.