Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;202:106986. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106986

Table 3.

Grading the evidence with GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool.

Certainty assessment
No. of patients
Effect
Certainty Importance
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Baricitinib Control Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Mortality
3 Randomised trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 106/1330 (8.0%) 166/1329 (12.5%) RR 0.64 (0.51–0.79) 45 fewer per 1000 (from 61 fewer to 26 fewer) ⨁⨁⨁⨁
High
CRITICAL
Mortality
11 Observational studies Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 102/967 (10.5%) 157/975 (16.1%) RR 0.58 (0.45–0.73) 68 fewer per 1000 (from 89 fewer to 43 fewer) ⨁⨁◯◯
Low
CRITICAL
Disease progression
2 Randomised trials Not serious Seriousa Not serious Seriousb None 171/1225 (14.0%) 206/1222 (16.9%) RR 0.80 (0.58–1.10)< 34 fewer per 1000 (from 71 fewer to 17 more) ⨁⨁◯◯
Low
CRITICAL
Disease progression without 2 PB articles
8 Observational studies Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 44/689 (6.4%) 79/733 (10.8%) RR 0.54 (0.37–0.78) 50 fewer per 1000 (from 68 fewer to 24 fewer) ⨁⨁◯◯
Low
CRITICAL

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; PB: publication bias.

Explanation.

a

No agreement between 2 studies where one said yes and one said no to BDP.

b

Based on optimal information size (OIS) calculation; the OIS did not achieve.