Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 9;16(10):2373–2387. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01281-0

Table 1.

Genome features of the “Ca. Methylarchaeales” MAGs.

Geolocation Techeng Island Dongzhai Harbour Lake Towuti Tengchong Hotspring
MAGs H03B1 HK01M HK01B HK02M1 HK02M2 TDP8 TDP10 JZ-2-bin_220a
Proposed name Ca. Methanoinsularis halodrymi” Ca. Methanoinsularis haikouensis” Ca. Methanoporticola haikouensis” Ca. Methanotowutia igneaquae” Ca. Methylarchaeum tengchongensis”
Bin size (Mbp) 1.45 1.36 1.06 1.36 1.34 2.55 2.45 1.23
Longest contigs/scaffolds (Kbp) 75.78 57.97 39.77 74.56 76.12 29.99 282.68 75.49
Number of contigs/scaffolds 86 160 128 73 91 570 141 54
N50 value 25,415 11,242 12,847 26,542 19,004 5614 53,503 30,160
Number of predicted genesb 1607 1490 1151 1437 1446 3291 2850 1354
Completeness (%)c 96.60 95.63 90.78 92.72 94.42 94.69 99.51 97.09
Contamination (%)c 0.97 1.46 0.97 2.43 2.91 0.97 0.97 0.97
Strain heterogeneity (%)c 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33 25.00 100.00 0.00 0.00
GC (%) 42.51 40.68 41.11 40.81 36.64 38.78 38.95 39.00

aHua et al. [7].

bInferred with Prodigal.

cBased on lineage-specific marker sets determined with CheckM.