Table 1.
Comparison between MMT-mAmCs composite and other adsorbents reported elsewhere, in terms of adsorption capacity (mg/g), and adsorption conditions toward MB&CV removal.
| Material name | Adsorption capacity, mg/g | pH conditions | Ref | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MB | CV | |||
| MMT-mAmCs | 137 | 118 | 7 | Here |
| Sn/Si mixtures | 30.13 | 36.83 | 6 | 58 |
| Magnetic iron oxide/activated sericite nanocomposites | 35.36 | 35.45 | ~ 6 | 59 |
| Almond shell-based material | – | 12.2 | 6 | 60 |
| Lemongrass leaf fibers incorporated with cellulose acetate | – | 36.10 | 7.47 | 61 |
| Eco-Friendly Reduced Graphene Oxide | 121.95 | – | 7 | 62 |
| Mesoporous Ni–C–N/Silica aerogel | 54 | – | 10 | 63 |
| Chitosan–montmorillonite/polyaniline nanocomposite | 111 | – | – | 64 |
| Biochar from lychee seed | 124.5 | – | 7 | 65 |
| Modified rice husk | – | 90.02 | 10 | 66 |
| AgTiO2 Loading into Poly(3-Nitrothiophene) | – | 43.10 | 8 | 67 |
| β-cyclodextrin carbon-sphere-based nanocomposite | – | 87.873 | 7.5 | 68 |
| Copolymer adsorbent of AA and AMP | – | 9.8 | 10 | 69 |