Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;9:26. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00198-6

Table 5.

Internalizing and continuous BPD symptoms

Model Effect Variable Est 95% CI t p FDR-p
Impulsivity
Random
Intercept 1.69 [1.23, 1.98]
Fixed
Intercept 2.16 [1.73, 2.58] 9.76 .000 .000
Time -0.25 [-0.72, 0.22] -1.04 .302 .483
Age 0.19 [-0.28, 0.66] 0.78 .434 .607
Sex -0.05 [-0.43, 0.32] -0.26 .792 .916
BPFSC (z) 0.60 [0.24, 0.97] 3.15 .002 .006
Parent Impulsivity (z) 0.61 [0.21, 1.01] 2.93 .004 .011
Obs Impulsivity (z) 0.01 [-0.36, 0.38] 0.06 .954 .970
BPFSC (z) x Parent Impulsivity (z) 0.12 [-0.27, 0.50] 0.59 .559 .692
BPFSC (z) x Obs Impulsivity (z) 0.25 [-0.14, 0.64] 1.22 .223 .382
Error
Residual 2.04 [1.82, 2.29]
Initiative
Random
Intercept 1.69 [1.23, 1.99]
Fixed
Intercept 2.20 [1.78, 2.62] 10.00 .000 .000
Time -0.26 [-0.74, 0.21] -1.08 .280 .464
Age 0.47 [0.01, 0.93] 1.95 .053 .113
Sex -0.13 [-0.49, 0.23] -0.72 .473 .622
BPFSC (z) 0.72 [0.37, 1.08] 3.88 .000 .001
Parent Initiative (z) -0.37 [-0.76, 0.01] -1.87 .064 .134
Obs Initiative (z) -0.04 [-0.40, 0.32] -0.21 .834 .931
BPFSC (z) x Parent Initiative (z) 0.02 [-0.38, 0.41] 0.09 .932 .965
BPFSC (z) x Obs Initiative (z) 0.57 [0.20, 0.95] 2.92 .004 .011
Error
Residual 2.05 [1.83, 2.30]
Lability
Random
Intercept 1.66 [1.21, 1.95]
Fixed
Intercept 2.13 [1.71, 2.56] 9.61 .000 .000
Time -0.25 [-0.72, 0.21] -1.07 .285 .465
Age 0.21 [-0.23, 0.66] 0.91 .362 .552
Sex -0.15 [-0.51, 0.21] -0.82 .412 .599
BPFSC (z) 0.51 [0.15, 0.88] 2.68 .008 .021
Parent Lability (z) 0.81 [0.43, 1.20] 4.07 .000 .000
Obs Lability (z) -0.25 [-0.61, 0.10] -1.37 .173 .308
BPFSC (z) x Parent Lability (z) 0.27 [-0.08, 0.61] 1.46 .147 .279
BPFSC (z) x Obs Lability (z) 0.15 [-0.23, 0.52] 0.75 .455 .607
Error
Residual 1.95 [1.73, 2.20]

Note. Est Model-provided parameter estimate, CI Confidence interval, t t-test statistic, p p-value, FDR-p FDR-corrected p-value, Obs observed. Bolded values indicate those that are significant at FDR-corrected p < .05. The “(z)” after a variable indicates it is standardized