TABLE 1.
Potential IHF- and C1-binding sites and rho-independent terminators in P22 DNAa
Location | Similarity score | Sequence | Potential function |
---|---|---|---|
Potential IHF-binding sites | |||
427–453 | 57.4 | TTCTTGATATTAACTGTTTATCTTCAA | |
2855–2829 | 50.1 | AGATAAAAACTATCAAATTATACATTA | |
3032–3006 | 52.4 | CCTTTTAAGTCAACAACATACCACGTC | |
[3087–3113] | 61.7 | CCAGTTAAATCAAATACTTACGTATTA | |
[11584–11558] | 53.3 | GCATATGAATCAACTGTTTAAGTGTCA | |
12711–12685 | 49.8 | AAGTAACGATAAAATATTTAAGTTTTC | |
19623–19597 | 53.5 | CAACTTTATTCAAAAAGTCAATATCAT | |
21186–21212 | 54.2 | CACTGAAATTTAACAAGTGACTTTCAG | |
[21579–21605] | 52.6 | CCGAAAAAATCAATAACTTAGGGATTT | |
37218–37244 | 51.4 | TAGAAAAAAACAACCACGCAATCTGCA | |
Lambda cro/cII | 61.5 | TGCATACATTCAATCAATTGTTATCTA | |
Potential C1-binding sites | |||
2946–2959 | TTGCATCGGTTTGC | ||
2956–2969 | TTGCAAGGCTTTGC | ||
4647–4660 | TTGCGGGTGCTTGC | PaI | |
13809–13796 | TTGCGAGTGCTTGT | PRE | |
18448–18435 | TTGCCTAACCTTGC | ||
19237–19224 | TTGCGAGCACTTGC | ||
24346–24333 | TTGCCCGTATTTGT | ||
26998–26985 | TTGCCGGGTCTTGT | ||
27542–27529 | TTGCCGGGTCTTGT | ||
34184–34171 | TTGCTGCGGATTGT | ||
40808–40795 | TTGCGAGAGGTTGT | ||
Rho-independent terminators | |||
2871–2900 | ATTGATCGTTGTTACCGATCAATTTTTATT | ||
5152–5179 | ACCGCCATCAGGCGGCTTGGTGTTCTTT | ||
[5167–5144] | GCCGCCTGATGGCGGTTTTTTATT | ||
10157–10188 | AGCCGCACTCAGGCGGCTGTCGTTTCTTCTTT | ||
[10174–10148] | AGCCGCCTGAGTGCGGCTTTTTCATAT | ||
[10519–10490] | TTGCCGCTCTATATGGGCGGCATTCTTTTT | ||
[18516–18488] | CTCGCTTTCACAGCGGCTTTCTCTTCGTT | ||
21218–21246 | TGCCTCGCAGATGCGGGGCGTTTTTGTAT | ||
22161–22187 | AGCCGCTTACTTAGCGGCTTGACGTTT | ||
[22179–22154] | AGCCGCTAAGTAAGCGGCTTTTTTAT | ||
37691–37723 | AGCCGGAGTGACCCGGCTTGATTATTACTTTTT | ||
[37708–37682] | AGCCGGGTCACTCCGGCTTTTTGATAT | ||
39487–39512 | ACCCAGCTTCGGCTGGGTTTTTTTAT | ||
39634–39660 | ACCGTAGCCATGCTGCGGCAATTCCTT | ||
[39652–39623] | GCCGCAGCATGGCTACGGTGAATTTTTTGT | ||
40243–40265 | TCCCGCATTGCCGGGGTTTTTAT |
In the case of IHF-binding sites, we have included the similarity scores calculated by MacTargsearch (24). The bases which are identical to the consensus sequence are highlighted in boldface. For comparison, we have included a characterized IHF-binding site in coliphage λ. Putative C1-binding sites were determined by scanning the sequence for the consensus sequence (TTGCN6TTGY), while rho-independent terminators were determined using the Genetics Computer Group terminator program. Only those sites for which there was evidence of a stem-loop structure (boldface and underlined) followed by a region rich in thymine residues were included. The sites in brackets are those associated with the complementary strand.