Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 2;9:914587. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.914587

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author Year Country/Region Study Design DM type Sample size Sex (Male/Female) Age (year, mean ± SD or median (range)) Method NOS
Abd El Dayem (16) 2015 Egypt cross-sectional 1 92 DM: 31/31 16.32 ± 1.52 ELISA 6
C: 15/15 16.3 ± 2.63
Nielsen (24) 2010 Denmark cross-sectional 1 204 118/86 38 ± 12.6 ELISA 8
Panduru (25) 2013 Australia cross-sectional 1 2454 DM: 1126/1120 NA ELISA 8
C: 106/102 35.9 ± 11.3
Suh (26) 2016 South Korea cross-sectional 1 61 DM: 12/17 NA ELISA 7
C: 13/19 11.91 ± 3.61
Chou (27) 2013 Taiwan/China longitudinal 2 140 72/68 56.6 ± 9.8 ELISA 6
Thi (6) 2020 Vietnam cross-sectional 2 136 60/76 NA ELISA 7
Eynatten (28) 2010 Germany cross-sectional 2 170 125/45 DM:60.7 ± 7.4 ELISA 8
C:51.9 ± 9.5
Fufaa (29) 2015 the Gila River Indian Community longitudinal 2 260 82/178 42.5(18.7-65.1) ELISA 8
Gohda (30) 2018 Japan cross-sectional 2 314 166/148 64 ± 13 ELISA 7
Ito (31) 2017 Japan cross-sectional 2 788 457/331 66 ± 12 ELISA 6
Kamijo (32) 2011 Japan cross-sectional 2 552 88/52 NA ELISA 7
Suzuki (33) 2005 Japan cross-sectional 2 356 229/127 63 ± 11 ELISA 7
Viswanathan (34) 2015 India cross-sectional 2 78 45/33 NA ELISA 7

DM, diabetes mellitus; C, control; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; NA, Not Available; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.