Table 2.

Comprehensiveness (out of 8 possible domains + other) of Observational School Audit Tools (n = 23).

ID	Tool Name (or study author)	Total Domainsa	Water access (presence, quality of water sources)	Marketing (presence and quality of posters, branding)	Cafeteria (layout, service line)	Vending/A la carte (location, content)	Classroom (n/a)	Indoor Play Area (equipment condition, number of facilities)	Outdoor Play Area (equipment condition, number of facilities	Garden/Landscape (size, condition of garden)	Otherb
1	ACTION! Staff Audit	8	X	X	X	X		X	X	X	X
2	Adachi et al, 2013	1				X
3	Belansky et al, 2013	5		X	X	X			X	X
4	Branding Checklist	2		X	X
5	Co-SEA	6	X	X	X	X		X	X
6	EAPRS	1							X
7	ENDORSE	2			X	X
8	Food Decision Environment Tool	2		X	X
9	GRF-OT	1							X
10	Hecht et al, 2017	1	X
11	ISAT	6	X			X		X	X	X	X
12	Laurie et al,	1								X
13	LCFO	3	X		X	X
14	PARA	2	X						X
15	Patel et al,	4			X	X		X	X
16	School Food Environment Scan	2	X	X
17	School Lunchroom Audits	2		X	X
18	SF-EAT	2			X	X
19	SNDA-III	1				X
20	SNEO	1			X
21	SPACE Checklist	1							X
22	SPAN-ET	5	X		X			X	X	X
23	SPEEDY	4	X						X	X	X
	Total Tools		9	7	12	10	0	5	11	6	3

^aMean domains covered = 2.7 (SD = 2.0).

^bOther: active transport infrastructure (ISAT, SPEEDY), facilities (e.g., fast food restaurants) in view (ISAT, ACTION).