Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;12(9):e2738. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2738

TABLE 3.

Treatment of acute ischemic stroke in CRS‐ER

Year of publication Test population (n) TICI 2b or 3 P value ICH P value mRS 0−2 at 3 months P value Death at 3 months P value Intrahospital mortality p value
2018(Jung et al., 2018) CRS (19) vs. LAA (105) vs. CE (205) 63.0% vs. 84.0% vs. 84.0% 0.060 N/A N/A 16.0% vs. 54.0% vs. 44.0% 0.008 63.0% vs. 4.0% vs. 13.0% <  0.001 N/A N/A
2019(Sallustio et al., 2019) CRS (24) vs. Non‐cancer (24) 76.9% vs. 61.5% 0.670 25.0% vs. 29.0% 1.000 25.0% vs. 29.1% 1.000 29.1% vs. 12.5% 0.280 8.3% vs. 4.1% 1.000
2019(D. Lee et al., 2019) CRS (26) vs. Non‐cancer (227) 88.5% vs. 90.7% 0.723 57.7% vs. 38.7% 0.034 23.1% vs. 41.9% 0.064 30.8% vs. 8.8% 0.003 N/A N/A
2020(Cho et al., 2020) CRS (27) vs. Non‐cancer (351) 85.2% vs. 82.6% 0.800 44.4% vs. 32.8% 0.290 37.0% vs. 39.6% 0.840 33.3% vs. 8.2% < 0.001 3.7% vs. 2.3% 0.490
2021(E. Lee et al., 2021) CRS (34) vs. Non‐cancer (307) 79.4% vs. 86.7% 0.103 41.2% vs. 23.8% 0.037 N/A N/A 26.5% vs. 6.8% < 0.001 20.6% vs. 5.9% 0.009
2021(Ciolli et al., 2021) CRS (14) vs. Non‐cancer (267) 71.0% vs. 78.0% 0.520 43.0% vs. 40.0% 1.000 21.0% vs. 44.0% 0.160 64.0% vs. 14.0% < 0.010 43.0% vs. 6.0% < 0.010

Abbreviations: ERT, endovascular recanalization therapy; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage.