Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;12(9):e2724. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2724

TABLE 3.

TDCS studies in children and adolescents with dyslexia—Latest update on March 2022

# Author Design (control condition) N Mean age ± SD [age range] Target electrode site Return electrode site/electrode size Intensity Duration Polarity Outcome measure Major finding
1 Costanzo et al. (2016a) RCT double blind (sham controlled) 19 13.7 ± 2.4 [10–17] Left parietotemporal (mid P7‐TP7) Right parietotemporal/5 × 5 cm 1 mA 20 min (3 single sessions) Anodal/cathodal Reading abilities Anodal left cathodal right temporoparietal tDCS improved reading accuracy. The reverse protocol decreased accuracy
2 Costanzo et al. (2016b) RCT double blind (sham controlled) 18 13.2 ± 2.6 [10–17] Left parietotemporal (mid P7‐TP7) Right parietotemporal/5 × 5 cm 1 mA 18 × 20 min Anodal Reading abilities Reduced reading errors and increased reading speed after active tDCS vs sham up to 1 month
3 Costanzo et al. (2019) RCT double blind (sham controlled) 26 13.6 ± 2.4 [10–17] Left parietotemporal (mid P7‐TP7) Right parietotemporal/5 × 5 cm 1 mA 18 × 20 min Anodal Reading abilities Improved non‐word and low frequency word reading after active tDCS vs sham up to 6 months
4 Rahimi et al. (2019a) RCT single blind (sham controlled) 17 10.35 ± 1.36 [9–12]
  1. Bilateral STG (T7,T8)

  2. Left STG (T3,T4)

Right shoulder/5 × 5 cm 1 mA 20 min (3 single sessions) Anodal Auditory processing and ERP correlates Improved visual attention processing in active tDCS vs sham
5 Rahimi et al. (2019b) RCT single blind (waitlist control) 45 (tDCS group = 15) Primary school age 2–5 grade [7–10] Left dlPFC (F3) NR/5 × 5 cm 1.5 mA 10 × 20 min (daily) Anodal Visual sustained attention Left dlPFC tDCS Improved visual attention processing in active tDCS vs sham in children with a specific learning disorder
6 Lazzaro et al. (2021a) RCT double blind (sham controlled) 26 13.80 ± 2.3 [10.8–17.8] Left TPJ (between P7‐TP7) Right TPJ (between P8‐TP8)/5 × 5 cm 1 mA 18 × 20 min Anodal/cathodal Word and pseudoword reading Anodal left cathodal right TPJ tDCS in the active group improved word reading fluency in dyslexia
7 Lazzaro et al. (2021b) RCT single blind (no sham) 10 13.89 ± 2.4 [10.8–16.7] Left TPJ (between P7‐TP7) Right TPJ (between P8‐TP8)/5 × 5 cm 1 mA 20 min (single session) Anodal/cathodal Word and pseudoword reading Anodal left cathodal right TPJ improved text reading accuracy, word recognition, speed, motion perception, and modified attentional focusing

Note: tDCS = transcranial direct current stimulation; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SD = standard deviation; ERP = event‐related potentials; dlPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; F3 = left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; T3/T4 = left and right temporal cortex; P7 = left parietal‐temporal region; TP7 = left parietal‐central region; P8 = right parietal‐temporal region; TP8 = right parietal‐central region; STG = superior temporal gyrus; TPJ = temporoparietal junction.