Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;15(Suppl):2006424. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006424

Table 2.

Program supervision findings on correct assessment, classification, treatment, and dosage of child illnesses.

Indicator Cycle 3 (%)
Records review of sick children’s cases from previous month
% of sick children seen by CHWs with concordance between signs/symptoms and referral in all five reviewed records (n = 300/440) 68.2
% of sick children seen by CHWs with concordance between signs/symptoms and classification in all five reviewed records (n = 307/440) 69.7
% of sick children seen by CHWs with concordance between the age of child and dosage prescribed for all illnesses in all records reviewed (n = 306/440) 69.5
Direct observation during case management or simulation
% of sick children who had their temperature measured correctly (408/427) 94.4
% of sick children who had their arm circumference measured by CHWs according to MoH protocol (350/424) 82.5
% of sick children examined by CHWs for danger signs, among a list of 14, during consultation (336/432) 77.8
% of sick children who had their respiratory rate counted by CHWs within +/-2 of the clinician’s count (n = 332/375) 88.5
% of sick children who had CHWs use a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) according to MoH protocol (n = 290/385) 75.3
% of sick children who had CHWs correctly classifying their symptoms according to MoH protocol (379/435) 87.1
% of sick children who had CHWs administer the first dose of medicine (n = 325/431) 75.4
% of sick children who had CHWs explain to the mother how to administer the medicine at home (how many tablets/spoonsful, how many times/day and how many days) (n = 332/431) 77.0