Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Jun 24:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002964. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002964

The Differential Effects of Adiposity and Fitness on Functional Connectivity in Preadolescent Children

Nicole E Logan 1, Daniel R Westfall 1, Lauren B Raine 2, Sheeba A Anteraper 3, Laura Chaddock-Heyman 1,4, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli 1, Arthur F Kramer 1,4, Charles H Hillman 1,2
PMCID: PMC9481684  NIHMSID: NIHMS1806868  PMID: 35763600

Abstract

Purpose:

Childhood obesity is a global health concern, with >340 million youth considered overweight or obese. In addition to contributing greatly to health care costs, excess adiposity associated with obesity is considered a major risk factor for premature mortality from cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, and is also negatively associated with cognitive and brain health. A complementary line of research highlights the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness, a byproduct of engaging in physical activity, on an abundance of health factors, including cognitive and brain health.

Methods:

This study investigated the relationship among excess adiposity (visceral adipose tissue [VAT], subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue [SAAT]), total abdominal adipose tissue [TAAT], whole-body percent fat [WB%FAT], Body Mass Index (BMI), and fat-free cardiorespiratory fitness (FF-VO2max) on resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in 121 (f = 68) children (7–11 years) using a data-driven whole-brain multi-voxel pattern analysis.

Results:

Multi-voxel pattern analysis revealed brain regions that were significantly associated with VAT, BMI, WB%FAT and FF-VO2 measures. Yeo’s (2011) RSFC-based 7-network cerebral cortical parcellation was used for labeling the results. Post hoc seed-to-voxel analyses found robust negative correlations of VAT and BMI with areas involved in the visual, somatosensory, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, fronto-parietal and default mode networks. Further, positive correlations of FF-VO2 were observed with areas involved in the ventral attention and fronto-parietal networks. These novel findings indicate that negative health factors in childhood may be selectively and negatively associated with the 7 Yeo-defined functional networks, yet positive health factors (FF-VO2) may be positively associated with these networks.

Conclusions:

These novel results extend the current literature to suggest that BMI and adiposity are negatively associated with, and cardiorespiratory fitness (corrected for fat-free mass) is positively associated with, resting state functional connectivity networks in children.

Keywords: RESTING STATE, FMRI, BRAIN FUNCTION, CHILDHOOD OBESITY, CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS

INTRODUCTION

Childhood obesity is a global health concern. Around the world, over 340 million children and adolescents aged 5–19, and 38 million children under the age of 5, are considered overweight or obese (1). Obesity has become the focus of many public health efforts in the United States due to increasing prevalence over the last few decades. In addition to contributing greatly to health care costs (2), excess adiposity associated with obesity is considered a heritable neurobehavioral disorder that is highly sensitive to environmental conditions (3), a major risk factor for premature mortality from cardiovascular and metabolic diseases (4), and has recently been associated with negative cognitive (57) and brain (813) health outcomes. Notably, children with obesity commonly become adults with obesity, with 52% of adults over the age of 18 considered overweight (1.9 billion adults) or obese (650 million adults) (1). As such, considerable efforts have been taken to reduce the negative health outcomes associated with childhood obesity, as assessed via Body Mass Index (BMI). Previous research has highlighted the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness, a byproduct of engaging in physical activity, on an abundance of physical health outcomes throughout the lifespan, including the prevention of obesity (14) and the promotion of cognitive and brain health (15, 16). Therefore, investigations into the relationship between excess adiposity and cardiorespiratory fitness are necessary to understand the effects on brain health.

Given that a hallmark of obesity is excess adiposity, distinguishing between amount and type of adipose tissue within the body is of further importance. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is used as the gold-standard method of characterizing adipose tissue within the body, such as the distinction between subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues. Whole-body percent fat (WB%FAT), derived from the DXA scan, represents the total mass of fat divided by total body mass (17). Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAAT) lies beneath the skin and on top of the abdominal musculature. In adults, approximately 80% of total fat is stored at SAAT. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is located in the body cavity beneath the abdominal muscles, surrounding the liver, pancreas, and intestines. VAT accounts for 20% of total fat in men and 5–8% in women (18), and preadolescent boys tend to accumulate more VAT than girls (19). Consequently, VAT is considered a more dangerous type of adipose tissue when accumulated in excess. As such, VAT is also a strong predictor of age-related cognitive impairment in humans (20), and has been related to impaired cognitive function in children (57). Here, we define total abdominal adipose tissue (TAAT) as the total adipose tissue within these regions (SAAT and VAT).

Functional Connectivity and Childhood Obesity

Cognitive functions during childhood are sensitive to obesity and the health complications associated with obesity (5). Further, childhood obesity has been associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of brain structure (11, 12, 21) and function (fMRI) (8, 9, 13). Individual differences, such as adiposity and obesity, have been associated with variance in brain structures among children and adolescents. For example, early life factors such as birth weight, birth height and breast feeding have been associated with grey matter volumes in regions related to higher-order cognition and emotion regulation (12), and lean mass index was positively associated with white matter volumes in tracts that subserve executive function, memory, and attention (10). Similarly, different types of adipose tissue are selectively associated with cognitive and brain functions. Specifically, better performance on tasks of intellectual abilities and cognitive efficiency were associated with less VAT in children with normal weight (7). However, worse performance on tasks of intellectual abilities and cognitive efficiency were associated with greater VAT in children with obesity (7). Additionally, in children with obesity, VAT has been selectively associated with poorer neuroelectric indices of executive function compared to SAAT (44), and VAT has also been associated with poorer cognitive abilities in children compared to SAAT and WB%FAT (7). Further, fMRI studies have identified differences in resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) associated with obesity across the lifespan. In adults, obesity has been associated with alterations in salience network connectivity (9), and specific reductions in activity in brain regions associated with memory (hippocampus, angular gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) compared to their normal weight counterparts during tasks of episodic memory (8). Collectively, cognitive and brain studies demonstrate robust evidence for negative associations among children and adults with obesity.

Functional Connectivity and Cardiovascular Fitness in Children

A complimentary line of research has continually demonstrated a beneficial influence of fitness on cognitive and brain function in children (2225) and adult populations (16). Of specific focus, children with greater fitness demonstrate positive associations with neuroelectric indices of cognitive function (24, 25), greater hippocampal volume (as measured using MRI) coupled with better relational memory task performance (23), and greater efficiency of brain networks underlying cognitive function (22). Additionally, in a sample of healthy young adults using a connectome-wide association approach, positive brain-fitness (cardiovascular fitness and RSFC) relationships were present (16). Notably understudied, however, is the influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on RSFC in preadolescent children.

Few studies have investigated the differential relationships of underlying brain network correlates with excess adiposity and fitness in preadolescent children. Notably, greater cardiorespiratory fitness in children with overweight/obesity has been related to greater grey matter volumes in premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and hippocampus, which were also related to better academic performance (26). Differences in brain structure among weight status and physical activity or fitness have also been supported elsewhere (27, 28). Additionally, sedentary behaviors and overweight/obesity in childhood have been negatively associated with grey matter volume (28), and white matter microstructure (27) in children.

Current Study

Consequently, research continues to demonstrate that fitness has a beneficial effect on childhood brain health. However, risk factors associated with obesity, including excess adiposity and risk for developing metabolic syndrome, appear to dampen various aspects of this trajectory. As such, the primary objective of the current study was to decompose the brain-fitness-adiposity relationship in children, by using an unbiased data-driven approach with multi-voxel patten analysis. The aim of multi-voxel pattern analysis is to derive seeds based on the data prior to performing a post hoc analysis on the seeds to analyze brain connectivity patterns (29). Multi-voxel pattern analysis is a well-suited method for uncovering subtle representational differences in a precise manner, especially when these representations are hypothesized to be distributed (30). The current analysis also used a preprocessing technique, aCompCor, which allows for the interpretation of anticorrelations between different cortical networks (31). We investigated the relationship between different types of adipose tissue and cardiorespiratory fitness on RSFC networks in preadolescent children. We predicted that functional connectivity would be differentially and selectively associated with adiposity and BMI, compared to cardiorespiratory fitness. We predicted that VAT and BMI would be negatively associated with functional connectivity. We further predicted that WB%FAT, TAAT and SAAT would be positively associated with functional connectivity, as previous studies suggest a positive relationship between these measures of adiposity and cognition in children with normal weight (7). Lastly, we predicted that FF-VO2 would be positively associated with functional connectivity. VAT is considered to be the more metabolically dangerous type of adipose tissue when accumulated in excess, compared to SAAT, TAAT, and WB%FAT. Finally, an abundance of previous research demonstrates the positive influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on brain health, which provides a basis for our predication of a positive association between these variables.

METHODS

Participants

The present study includes 121 participants that were used in the final analysis. This sample size originates from combined imaging data from a subset of the 283 children between 7–11-years-old who were recruited to participate in the FITKids2 trial (n = 192, baseline data only) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers: NCT01334359) and the FLEX study (n= 91). All participants provided written assent and their legal guardians provided written informed consent in accordance with the Institutional Review Board of the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. Participants were administered the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test or the Woodcock Johnson (III) to assess IQ, a Tanner Staging System (32) questionnaire to assess pubertal status, and the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire to screen for health issues exacerbated by physical exercise. Socioeconomic status (SES) was determined using a trichotomous index based on participation in free or reduced-price meal program at school, the highest level of education obtained by parents, and the number of parents who worked full time (33). Legal guardians completed health history and demographics questionnaires. Based on these questionnaires, participants included in this analysis did not receive special educational services from their school, were right-handed, reported no use of medications that influenced central nervous system function, qualified as prepubescent, and had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Participants were excluded if there was (1) a presence of neurological disorders and physical disabilities, and other factors that precluded participation in the physical aspects of the study, such as not completing: (2) the mock MRI session to successfully screen for claustrophobia (3) the aerobic fitness test, or the (4) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to assess body composition. Participants were further excluded from data analyses if (5) they did not complete the MRI/fMRI scans (n = 133), (6) did not complete both resting state scans or had missing brain slices in the field-of-view (n = 16), or (7) they had excessive removal of data after scrubbing resulting in less than 5-min (34) of useable data (n = 13; see ‘fMRI Preprocessing’ for criteria). Data from 121 participants were used for final analysis (Table 1). There were no significant differences between participants who were included or excluded from analysis based on age, sex, SES, pubertal timing, or IQ (all p’s > 0.05). While the removal of 13 participants due to data scrubbing related issues that resulted in scans with less than 5-min of useable data is quite large, previous papers have found a 30–50% scan attrition rate due to motion in preadolescent children using even less stringent movement criteria (compared to 19% herein) (35). Further, increased scanning motion has been associated with obesity (36, 37), and head motion artifacts have also been found to influence intrinsic functional connectivity measurements (38). Consequently, care was taken to sufficiently remove scans with motion. Because of the initial sample size, head-motion-related artifacts, as well as the high amounts of motion in a preadolescent and obese populations, stringent quality control methods (see ‘fMRI Preprocessing’) was used in the data analysis pipeline.

Table 1.

Participant demographics and body composition

Measure Mean ± sd
n 121 (68 female)
Age (years) 9.3 ± 1.1 (range: 7.6 – 12.5)
Pubertal Timing 1.44 ± 0.5
IQ 111.2 ± 13.3
SES 2.1 ± 0.8
VO2Fat-free (ml/kg(lean)/min) 62.7 ± 7.8 (range: 46.91 – 93.92)
BMI 19.0 ± 4.2 (range: 13.07 – 35.64)
SAAT (g) 797.6 ± 540.3 (range: 135.57 – 2758.82)
TAAT (g) 984.7 ± 627.4 (range: 245.16 – 3435.58)
VAT (g) 187.1 ± 114.2 (range: 30.77 – 676.76)
WBFAT (%) 31.1 ± 6.9 (range: 17.44 – 48.59)

Weight Status and Adiposity Assessment

Standing height and weight measurements were completed with participants wearing light-weight clothing and no shoes. Height and weight were measured using a stadiometer (Seca; model 240) and a Tanita WB-300 Plus digital scale (Tanita, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Weight status was determined with body mass index (BMI), calculated by dividing body mass (kg) by height (m) squared [(kg/m)2]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts (39) were used to determine individual BMI and BMI percentiles for age and sex values. Children from the current sample were categorized into the following BMI classes: underweight (n = 4, 3.3% of sample), normal weight (n=72, 59.5%), overweight (n=22, 18.2%), and obese (n=23, 19%). Adiposity measurements included VAT, SAAT, TAAT, and WB%FAT. Whole-body and regional soft tissue were measured by DXA using a Hologic QDR 4500A Discovery bone densitometer (software version 13.4.2; Hologic, Bedford, MA), as an accurate and valid measure of body composition in the pediatric population (40). Central adiposity (i.e., VAT, SAAT, TAAT) and WB%FAT was estimated using an algorithm that models subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue at the fourth lumbar vertebra and subtracts it from the regional abdominal region fat (6).

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Testing

Maximal oxygen consumption was measured on a treadmill using a graded VO2max exercise test, with a computerized indirect calorimetry system (ParvoMedics true Max 2400). A modified Balke protocol was utilized, whereby participants walked or ran at a constant speed with increasing grade increments of 2.5% every two minutes until volitional exhaustion, with time interval averages of VO2 and respiratory exchange rate (RER) assessed every 20 seconds. The protocol was administered on a LifeFitness 92T motor-driven treadmill (LifeFitness, Schiller Park, IL) with expired gases analyzed using a ParvoMedics TrueOne2400 Metabolic Measurement System (ParvoMedics, Sandy, Utah). Heart rate was assessed throughout the test with a Polar Heart Rate Monitor. The children’s OMNI scale (41) was used to assess ratings of perceived exertion every two minutes. VO2max qualification was based upon achieving at least three of the following four criteria: (i) a peak heart rate ≥ 185 bpm and a heart rate plateau, (ii) RER ≥ 1.0, (iii) an OMNI rating of perceived exhaustion ≥ 8, and/or (iv) a plateau in oxygen consumption corresponding to an increase of less than 2 ml/kg/min despite an increase in intensity (41). Fat-Free VO2max (FF-VO2; ml/min/kg-lean mass) was calculated using absolute VO2max (L/min) and lean mass (g) as the primary measure of fitness. Total lean mass (g) was derived from the DXA scanner, and was entered into the following equation: FF- VO2 = (Absolute VO2max (L/min) / Total lean mass (g))*1000. This measure has previously been shown to be the primary contributor to aerobic capacity in children of varying body mass (40), and has been used in previous research when assessing adiposity, fitness, cognitive or brain outcomes (7, 4244).

MRI Data Acquisition

Imaging data were collected on a 3T Siemens Magnetom Trio whole-body scanner with 12-channel radiofrequency head coil (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). High-resolution structural data were acquired using a T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence with 0.9 mm isotropic resolution (TR = 1900 ms, TE = 2.32 ms, TI = 900 ms) over 4 min 26 sec. Resting scans were collected for 8–11 minutes using a T2*-weighted EPI sequence (TR = 2000 ms, TE = 25 ms, flip angle = 90°, GRAPPA acceleration factor = 2, 92 × 92 matrix resolution, voxel size 2.6 × 2.6 × 3 mm3).

fMRI Preprocessing

Data were preprocessed using the default analysis pipeline in CONN toolbox (45), which includes realignment, slice timing correction, outlier detection, segmentation, normalization with respect to MNI template, and smoothing (6-mm FWHM kernel). The Artifact Detection Toolbox (ART) (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/artifact_detect) was used to flag scans with mean signal intensity outside 3 standard deviations from global mean and/or 0.5 mm scan-to-scan motion. To assure scan quality, these “invalid scans” were then regressed out. After data scrubbing, a minimum of 5-min scan time was required to include a participant in the analysis (34). Bandpass filtering was executed at 0.008–0.1 Hz. A component-based noise correction method (aCompCor) was used for denoising (46) as implemented in the CONN toolbox, as this method allows for interpretation of anticorrelations. The combination of aCompCor and ART toolboxes, allows for an optimized pre-processing approach for the analysis of functional connectivity data.

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis

Whole-brain connectome-wide multi-voxel pattern analysis was used as an agnostic, data driven approach to identify seed regions for standard seed-to-voxel analysis of resting state data using CONN toolbox (45, 47). Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensionality of the resultant data. First, 64 PCA components were retained for each participant’s voxel-to-voxel correlation structure. A second PCA was run across all participants and the first 6 components were retained to maintain a conservative 20:1 ratio of participants-to-components (47). An F-test was performed on all 6 multi-voxel pattern analysis components. Physiological measures for adiposity, body composition, and fitness (BMI, SAAT, TAAT, VAT, WB%FAT, and FF-VO2) were entered separately in the multi-voxel pattern analysis to determine patterns of functional connectivity associated with each of these measures, for a total of six separate analyses (body composition: BMI; adiposity: SAAT, TAAT, VAT, WB%FAT; and fitness: FF-VO2). Age, IQ, SES, and pubertal timing were entered as covariates in second level analyses as they correlated with physiological measures. In addition, mean motion did not correlate with IQ, SES or pubertal timing measures (all p’s > 0.05). A height-level statistical threshold of p < 0.001, cluster threshold of p < 0.005 false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected, and k > 50 were used to determine significant clusters. These clusters were then used as seeds for seed-to-voxel post hoc RSFC analyses to explore patterns of Yeo’s 7-network parcellation (2011) (48) functional connectivity differences between these seed time-courses and those with the rest of the brain, which were associated with adiposity and body composition. Post hoc analyses used a height threshold of whole-brain p < 0.001 and FDR-corrected cluster threshold of p < 0.005 with non-parametric statistics to reduce Type 1 error due to multiple comparisons (49). An additional post hoc analysis was conducted by adding mean motion as a covariate and the patterns of connectivity did not change.

Supplementary Statistical Analysis

Pearson product-moment correlations were conducted between aerobic fitness (FF-VO2) and adiposity measures (BMI, VAT, SAAT, TAAT, WB%FAT). Next, mediation analyses using the R mediation process package (50) were performed to assess (i) whether fitness (FF-VO2) mediated the associations between adiposity (BMI, VAT) and adiposity-associated RSFC outcomes; and (ii) whether adiposity factors (BMI, VAT) mediated associations between fat-free fitness (FF-VO2) and fitness-associated RSFC outcomes. The total effects (effect of X [predictor variable] on Y [outcome variable]), direct effects (effect of X on Y accounting for M [mediator] [average direct effect]) and indirect effects (the mediation effect) are reported. The presence of statistical mediation was determined through nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals via 5000 bootstrap resamples of the estimated indirect effect. The estimated indirect effect (mediation effect) corresponds to the reduction in the independent variable effect on the dependent variable when adjusted for the mediator. Multiple comparisons were corrected using Benjamini and Hochberg’s false discovery rate (FDR), at a q value of 0.05, after pooling the P values from the mediation analyses for each predictor model.

RESULTS

Statistically significant seed regions from the multi-voxel pattern analysis are displayed in Figure 1 and in Table 2. A whole-brain threshold of p < 0.001 and FDR-corrected cluster threshold of p < 0.005 were used to determine significant clusters.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Whole-brain multi-voxel pattern analysis results depicting the connectivity patterns significantly associated with body mass index (BMI, Fig 1a), visceral adipose tissue (VAT, Fig 1b) whole-body percent fat (WB%FAT, Fig 1c), and Fat-Free VO2 (FF-VO2, Fig 1d).

Table 2.

Body composition, adiposity and fitness associated resting state functional connectivity.

Model FC Regions Peak Coordinates (MNI) Peak Coordinates (Brain Region) BA Voxels per Cluster (k) Total K F t p-FDR

x y z Visual Somato-sensory Dorsal Attention Ventral Attention Limbic Fronto-Parietal Default Mode Not Labelled
BMI Seed MVPA (a) 24 58 28 ParaHippocampal_R Right-Amygdala (53) 10 63 73 5.18 *0.0003
Voxels cluster a1 −52 2 −18 Temporal_Mid_L Left-BA38 553 738 186 223 99 63 1804 411 4077 −8.36 *0.0000
cluster a2 58 −12 0 Temporal_Sup_R Right-PrimAuditory (41) 585 762 297 102 19 1 563 312 2641 −8.17 *0.0000
cluster a3 28 −74 −20 Cerebelum_6_R Right-BA19 845 375 1220 −5.51 *0.0000
cluster a4 −38 −48 −20 Fusiform_L Left-Fusiform (37) 356 247 30 70 703 −5.81 *0.0000
cluster a5 38 −36 −20 Fusiform_R Right-Fusiform (37) 415 79 36 26 415 −5.56 *0.0000
cluster a6 −20 60 −14 Frontal_Sup_Orb_L Left-BA11 192 3 117 52 364 −6.28 *0.0000
VAT Seed MVPA (b) −30 34 50 Frontal_Mid_L Left-BA8 9 21 86 41 157 6.44 *0.0000
Voxels cluster b1 −56 −10 −10 Temporal_Mid_L Left-BA22 53 224 108 151 491 24 2445 471 3697 −8.75 *0.0000
cluster b2 56 −6 −16 Temporal_Mid_R Right-BA22 148 193 217 221 489 7 1599 494 3368 −8.35 *0.0000
cluster b3 −42 −56 −16 Fusiform_L Left-Fusiform (37) 461 220 61 57 799 −6.15 *0.0000
cluster b4 44 −50 −20 Fusiform_R Right-Fusiform (37) 294 64 72 430 −4.86 *0.0000
cluster b5 −2 50 −18 Rectus_L Left-BA11 184 129 41 354 −5.62 *0.0000
WB%FAT Seed MVPA (c) −52 −60 22 Temporal_Mid_L Left-BA39 74 16 90 6.35 *0.0000
Voxels cluster c1 16 56 −26 Frontal_Sup_Orb_R Right-BA11 27 19 94 140 −6.32 0.0066
cluster c2 −30 −88 −20 Cerebelum_Crus1_L Left-VisualAssoc (18) 87 20 107 −5.38 0.0143
cluster c3 −20 50 −18 Frontal_Mid_Orb_L Left-BA11 62 3 23 88 −5.03 0.0238
FF-VO2 Seed MVPA (d) −12 −88 18 Cuneus_L Left-VisualAssoc (18) 51 20 71 5.03 *0.0004
Voxels cluster d1 −2 14 36 Cingulum_Mid_L Left-BA32 2 569 69 114 754 6.44 *0.0000
cluster d2 −42 14 −2 Insula_L Left-Insula (13) 1 420 1 25 20 130 597 8.06 *0.0000
cluster d3 −32 52 28 Frontal_Mid_L Left-BA10 216 48 6 15 285 6.10 *0.0000
cluster d4 42 12 2 Insula_R Right-BA44 253 19 272 5.97 *0.0000
SAAT Seed MVPA −2 38 38 Frontal_Sup_Medial_L Left-BA8 1 52 5 4.61 0.0228
Voxels - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TAAT Seed MVPA −4 40 38 Frontal_Sup_Medial_L Left-BA9 1 58 4 4.53 0.0125
Voxels - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*

denotes significance at the p-FDR ≤ 0.005 level and K≥50 (Cluster Level Threshold)

Results from the multi-voxel pattern analysis-derived clusters can be seen in Figure 2 and Table 2. A height threshold of whole-brain p < 0.001, FDR-corrected cluster threshold of p < 0.005, and K ≥ 50 cluster level threshold, was used for parametric post hoc characterization.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Results from the second-level seed-to-voxel RSFC analysis for multi-voxel pattern analysis clusters associated with BMI (Fig 2a, clusters a1-a6), VAT (Fig 2b, clusters b1-b5), FF-VO2 (Fig 2c, clusters d1-d4).

Results from the correlation analysis between physiological variables can be see in Table 3 and Figure 3. As expected, adiposity variables (BMI, SAAT, TAAT, VAAT, and WB%FAT) were highly and significantly correlated with each other. FF-VO2 was significantly negatively correlated with SAAT (r = −0.259, p ≤ 0.05), TAAT (r = −0.231, p ≤ 0.05), and WB%FAT (r = −0.186, p ≤ 0.05), but was not correlated with BMI (r = −0.174, p > 0.05) or VAT (r = −0.04, p > 0.05).

Table 3.

Correlation table between physiological variables (adiposity: WBPFAT, TAAT, SAAT, VAT; BMI, and FF-VO2).

BMI VAT (g) WBFAT (%) TAAT (g) SAAT (g) VO2_FF (mL/kg(lean)/min)
BMI r - .870** .811** .902** .863** −0.174
p - 0 0 0 0 0.056
VAT (g) r .870** - .693** .801** .719** −0.04
p 0 - 0 0 0 0.663
WBFAT (%) r .811** .693** - .891** .889** −.186*
p 0 0 - 0 0 0.041
TAAT (g) r .902** .801** .891** - .992** −.231*
p 0 0 0 - 0 0.011
SAAT (g) r .863** .719** .889** .992** - −.259**
p 0 0 0 0 - 0.004
VO2_FF (mL/kg(lean)/min) r −0.174 −0.04 −.186* −.231* −.259** -
p 0.056 0.663 0.041 0.011 0.004 -
**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Correlation plot between physiological variables (adiposity: WBPFAT, TAAT, SAAT, VAT; BMI, and FF-VO2).

BMI

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Results.

Analyses revealed six significant clusters associated with BMI located in the right para-hippocampal gyrus (cluster a, Fig 1a).

Post Hoc Seed-to-Voxel Characterization of Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis-Derived Clusters of Interest.

The seed region located in the right para-hippocampal gyrus (cluster a) was found to be negatively correlated with the visual, somatosensory, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, fronto-parietal, and default mode networks, as a function of BMI (Figure 2a).

VAT

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Results.

Analyses revealed nine significant clusters associated with VAT located in the left middle frontal lobe (cluster b, Fig 1b).

Post Hoc Seed-to-Voxel Characterization of Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis-Derived Clusters of Interest.

The seed region located in left middle frontal lobe (cluster b) was found to be negatively correlated with visual, somatosensory, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, and default mode networks, as a function of VAT (Figure 2b).

WB%FAT

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Results.

Analyses revealed six significant clusters associated with WB%FAT, located in the left middle temporal gyrus (cluster c, Fig 1c).

Post Hoc Seed-to-Voxel Characterization of Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis-Derived Clusters of Interest.

The seed region located in the left middle temporal gyrus (cluster c) was not significantly correlated with any of the 7 Yeo-defined functional networks, as a function of WB%FAT (Figure 2c).

SAAT

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Results.

There were no significant clusters associated with SAAT.

TAAT

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Results.

There were no significant clusters associated with TAAT.

FF-VO2

Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Results.

Analyses revealed three significant cluster associated with FF-VO2, located in the left cuneus (cluster d, Fig 1d).

Post Hoc Seed-to-Voxel Characterization of Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis-Derived Clusters of Interest.

The seed region located in the left cuneus (cluster d) was significantly correlated with ventral attention, and fronto-parietal networks, as a function of FF-VO2.

Mediation Results

Given that adiposity and fitness measures were differentially associated with RSFC outcomes, we asked whether (i) fitness mediated the relationship between adiposity on adiposity-associated RSFC outcomes (see Supplemental Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content, SDC 1), and (ii) whether adiposity mediated the relationship between fitness on fitness-associated RSFC outcomes (see Supplemental Table S2 and Table S3, Supplemental Digital Content, SDC 1). Supplemental Table S1 (see Supplemental Digital Content, SDC 1) displays the results of the first mediation analyses, whereby FF-VO2 did not mediate the relationship between VAT (g) or BMI and RSFC outcomes. Supplemental Tables S2 and S3 (see Supplemental Digital Content, SDC 1) display the results of the second mediation analyses, whereby adiposity (BMI: Supplemental Table S2, VAT: Supplemental Table S3; see Supplemental Digital Content, SDC 1) did not mediate the relationship between FF-VO2 and RSFC outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This study used an agnostic, connectome-wide multi-voxel pattern analysis approach to identify whole-brain RSFC associations with adiposity, body composition, and cardiorespiratory fitness in preadolescent children. We found that a number of network connectivity patterns were differentially associated with negative health factors (VAT, BMI), compared to positive health factors (fat-free fitness). Specifically, BMI was negatively correlated with RSFC in the visual, somatosensory, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, fronto-parietal, and default mode networks. Additionally, VAT was negatively correlated with RSFC in the visual, somatosensory, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, and default mode networks, which confirmed our a priori prediction. Alternatively, FF-VO2 was correlated with ventral attention, and fronto-parietal networks, which also confirmed our a priori prediction. Notably, WB%FAT, TAAT, and SAAT were unrelated to any of the functional networks, failing to confirm our prediction. Together, the data described herein provide novel support for a differential adiposity-fitness-brain relationship in preadolescent children. Overall, there was a negative effect of adiposity-related patterns, and a positive effect of fitness-related patterns, on whole-brain functional connectivity in preadolescent children.

Additionally, mediation analyses revealed that FF-VO2 did not mediate the relationship between adiposity (BMI, VAT) and RSFC, and that adiposity (BMI, VAT) did not mediation the relationship between FF-VO2 and RSFC. Notably, FF-VO2 was not correlated with either BMI or VAT. As such, the negative effects of adiposity-related RSFC patterns, and the positive effect of fitness-related RSFC patterns suggest these are relationships are independent from each other. These results indicate that positive health factors (such as increased fitness), alongside negative health factors (such as obesity) act differentially and independently from each other on RSFC networks.

The original results presented herein advance our understanding of the underlying functional networks associated with physiological health factors in children, which is important to consider given the global health concerns associated with childhood obesity. As such, considerable efforts should be taken to reduce the negative health outcomes associated with childhood obesity, such as with the promotion of cardiovascular fitness through physical activities. Accordingly, previous investigations into the relationship between aerobic fitness, obesity, and cognitive and brain function within the FITKids2 sample has found that 9 months of physical activity prevents the decline of obesity-associated neuroelectric function during preadolescent development (44).

The patterns identified in the current study are similar to patterns identified in previous research in children. For example, adolescents with obesity showed reduced global functional connectivity in the insula, the middle temporal cortex, and the DLPFC, compared to normal weight participants (51), indicating negative associations between negative health factors (childhood obesity) and RSFC. Additionally, physical activity in preadolescent children was recently found to be positively associated with resting state network connectivity in parietal cortices, supplementary motor cortex, putamen, and right primary motor cortex (52), indicating positive associations between positive health behaviors (physical activity) and RSFC.

The negative associations found with VAT are of particular interest, because excess VAT has been linked to poorer intellectual and cognitive abilities among children with obesity (7). However, VAT is also positively associated with intellectual abilities and cognitive efficiency among normal weight children (7). Adiposity and cognition research thus demonstrates a negative association between excess VAT and cognitive function only in children with obesity. Neuroimaging studies further suggest negative associations between VAT and brain structure (11, 12, 21) and function (8, 9, 13). This relationship is particularly concerning considering the dangerous metabolic nature of VAT, such that increased VAT is related to a higher risk of metabolic diseases, has a greater lipid turnover and a higher fat uptake (53), and contributes to insulin resistance (18) due to the production of inflammatory cytokines and hormones (53). Consequently, VAT is considered to be the more dangerous type of adipose tissue when accumulated in excess, compared to SAAT and TAAT, and has been related to impaired cognitive function in children (57). Following previous research, no associations were found between SAAT, TAAT and RSFC in the current study. This extends the current literature, which demonstrates a selective relationship for adiposity measures, such that VAT is negatively and uniquely associated with cognitive and brain outcomes (7). The selective adiposity associations observed in the current study are important to consider when evaluating the effect of VAT on Yeo’s (48) functional connectivity networks, as these networks have been associated with cognitive function in humans.

The concept of functional connectivity alludes to the notion that the purpose of neural populations is to collectively interact within the brain to produce sensorimotor and cognitive abilities (54). Additionally, the structural organization of the human cerebral cortex is suggested to derive from intrinsic functional connectivity, further indicating that information processing in the brain involves interactions among distributed areas of neural populations (48). As such, associations with physiological measures, including findings from the current study, on the spontaneous fluctuations in the BOLD signal via fMRI may elucidate the neural representation of individual differences in functional architecture, which may also be associated with cognitive processes. As excess VAT in childhood has been negatively implicated with cognitive abilities (7), the results from the current study suggest a negative relationship between adiposity and functional brain networks.

The agnostically-derived positive associations with cardiorespiratory fitness and RSFC in the current study contribute to the strong breadth of literature in this area across the lifespan. However, the results herein are the first to demonstrate positive associations between fat-free cardiorespiratory fitness and whole-brain RSFC in preadolescent children, as previous work has focused on associations with physical activity (55), hippocampal connectivity (56), or young adult (16) populations. Further, the current study is also the first to differentiate between positive (fitness) and negative (BMI, VAT) health factors on RSFC patterns. Subsequently, we have demonstrated that data driven RSFC methodologies are a strong candidate for investigating neuroimaging markers of the beneficial effect of fitness on brain function, and how obesity negatively influences this trajectory in preadolescent children. As such, our findings provide (1) novel support for a differential adiposity-fitness-brain relationship in preadolescent children, such that adiposity-related patterns showed negative correlations, and fitness-related patterns showed positive correlations within the Yeo networks; (2) support for the use of multi-voxel pattern analysis methodologies in future neuroimaging studies which assess the influence of functional brain imaging; and (3) support for the use of multi-voxel pattern analysis results from the current study as seeds in seed-to-voxel analyses when investigating relationships between brain and fitness and/or obesity in children.

Limitations

These findings should be interpreted in light of several limitations. The data were cross-sectional in nature, and as such, causal associations between adiposity, BMI and fitness cannot be inferred. Similarly, because RSFC was assessed at one time point, this study is unable to account for fluctuations of resting state focus, which may occur over longer periods of time. Additionally, the current study did not directly assess cognitive function, and as such, assumptions of RSFC networks and their associations with cognitive function should be taken lightly. Further, the current study used a data-driven approach to identify RSFC networks. Future studies could benefit from using a hypothesis-based approach to seed selection, based on the data-driven seeds identified herein, as well as previously identified areas associated with adult populations and fitness (i.e., default mode, dorsal and ventral attention, and frontoparietal networks) and adiposity (i.e., prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, angular gyrus, and salience network). The comparison between adult- and child-identified RSFC networks could provide evidence toward changes during brain development over the lifespan. Lastly, as previously discussed, child populations and individuals with obesity are two populations within the current sample associated with greater amounts of motion artifact. As such, the aggregation of the two populations resulted in a high amount of movement that occurred during data collection resulting in the loss of a number of participants who did not meet the required criteria of at least 5 minutes of clean scanning data. However, the stringent motion artifact criteria are also a strength of the current study, as previous research has found that movement causes issues with the integrity of RSFC measures (37). Further, the sample of 121 participants is also a strength of the current study, as this is relatively larger than previous RSFC studies in children.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first data-driven analysis investigating the association of positive and negative health factors on RSFC outcomes in preadolescent children. Using connectome-wide multi-voxel pattern analysis, we report robust negative associations between BMI, VAT and RSFC patterns with areas involved with the visual, somatosensory, dorsal attention, ventral attention, limbic, fronto-parietal, and default mode networks. Further, we report robust positive associations between fitness and RSFC patterns with areas involved in the ventral attention and fronto-parietal networks. Of particular interest is the differential nature of these relationships to VAT, BMI and fitness. Overall, these novel findings advance our understanding of the underlying RSFC networks associated with physiological health factors in children, and augment support for the utility of whole-brain data-driven methodologies. Childhood obesity is a global health concern which contributes greatly to healthcare costs and is a major risk factor for premature mortality from cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. As such, considerable efforts should be taken to reduce the negative health factors associated with childhood obesity, such as with the promotion of cardiovascular fitness through physical activity.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data Tables

Table S1: Mediation Model with adiposity (BMI, VAT) as the predictor, VO2-FF (ml/kg(lean)/min) as the mediator, and RSFC values as the dependent outcome. ADE, average direct effect; ACME, average causal mediation effect.

Table S2: Mediation Model with VO2-FF (ml/kg(lean)/min) as the predictor, BMI as the mediator, and RSFC values as the dependent outcome. ADE, average direct effect; ACME, average causal mediation effect.

Table S3: Mediation Model with VO2-FF (ml/kg(lean)/min) as the predictor, VAT (g) as the mediator, and RSFC values as the dependent outcome. ADE, average direct effect; ACME, average causal mediation effect.

Acknowledgements

The results of the present study do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Funding

Support for this project was provided by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant HD069381 awarded to Drs. Hillman and Kramer. These sources did not play a role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, nor in the writing of the report and decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of Interest and Funding Source:

Support for this project was provided by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant HD069381 awarded to Drs. Hillman and Kramer. These sources did not play a role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, nor in the writing of the report and decision to submit the article for publication. The authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. The authors of this document report no conflicts of interested associated with the collection, dissemination, or interpretation of this research. No patents, copyrights, or royalties are involved or included in this work. The results of this study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. The results of the present study do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest

The authors of this document report no conflicts of interested associated with the collection, dissemination, or interpretation of this research. No patents, copyrights, or royalties are involved or included in this work. The results of this study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation.

Registration

This submission was not registered.

Financial Interests

The authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Non-Financial Interests

The authors have no relevant non-financial interests to disclose.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request due to the need for a formal data sharing agreement.

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO. Obesity and Overweight Geneva, Switzerland 2020. [updated 1 April, 2020]. World Health Organization; ]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight#. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hammond RA, Levine R. The economic impact of obesity in the United States. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2010;3:285–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O’Rahilly S, Farooqi IS. Human obesity: a heritable neurobehavioral disorder that is highly sensitive to environmental conditions. Diabetes. 2008;57(11):2905–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404(6778):635–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kamijo K, Pontifex MB, Khan NA, et al. The negative association of childhood obesity to cognitive control of action monitoring. Cereb Cortex. 2012;24(3):654–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khan NA, Baym CL, Monti JM, et al. Central adiposity is negatively associated with hippocampal-dependent relational memory amoung overweight and obese children. J Pediatr. 2015;166(2):302–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raine LB, Drollette ES, Kao S-C, et al. The associations between adiposity, cognitive function, and achievement in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(9):1868–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheke LG, Bonnici HM, Clayton NS, Simons JS. Obesity and insulin resistance are associated with reduced activity in core memory regions of the brain. Neuropsychologia. 2017;96:137–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.García-García I, Jurado MÁ, Garolera M, et al. Alterations of the salience network in obesity: a resting-state fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34(11):2786–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gracia-Marco L, Esteban-Cornejo I, Ubago-Guisado E, et al. Lean mass index is positively associated with white matter volumes in several brain regions in children with overweight/obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2020:15(5):e12604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saute R, Soder R, Alves Filho J, Baldisserotto M, Franco A. Increased brain cortical thickness associated with visceral fat in adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2016;13(1):74–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Solis-Urra P, Esteban-Cornejo I, Cadenas-Sanchez C, et al. Early life factors, gray matter brain volume and academic performance in overweight/obese children: The ActiveBrains project. Neuroimage. 2019;202:116130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stice E, Yokum S, Burger KS, Epstein LH, Small DM. Youth at risk for obesity show greater activation of striatal and somatosensory regions to food. J Neurosci. 2011;31(12):4360–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schmidt M, Magnussen C, Rees E, Dwyer T, Venn A. Childhood fitness reduces the long-term cardiometabolic risks associated with childhood obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(7):1134–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Erickson KI, Hillman CH, Kramer AF. Physical activity, brain, and cognition. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2015;4:27–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Talukdar T, Nikolaidis A, Zwilling CE, et al. Aerobic fitness explains individual differences in the functional brain connectome of healthy young adults. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(10):3600–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong MC, Ng BK, Kennedy SF, et al. Children and adolescents’ anthropometrics body composition from 3-D optical surface scans. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27(11):1738–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freedland ES. Role of a critical visceral adipose tissue threshold (CVATT) in metabolic syndrome: implications for controlling dietary carbohydrates: a review. Nutr Metab. 2004;1(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee S, Kuk JL, Hannon TS, Arslanian SA. Race and gender differences in the relationships between anthropometrics and abdominal fat in youth. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(5):1066–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Whitmer R, Gustafson D, Barrett-Connor E, Haan M, Gunderson E, Yaffe K. Central obesity and increased risk of dementia more than three decades later. Neurology. 2008;71(14):1057–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gracia-Marco L, Esteban-Cornejo I, Ubago-Guisado E, et al. Lean mass index is positively associated with white matter volumes in several brain regions in children with overweight/obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2020;15(5):e12604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Voss MW, Chaddock L, Kim JS, et al. Aerobic fitness is associated with greater efficiency of the network underlying cognitive control in preadolescent children. Neuroscience. 2011;199:166–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chaddock L, Erickson KI, Prakash RS, et al. A neuroimaging investigation of the association between aerobic fitness, hippocampal volume, and memory performance in preadolescent children. Brain Res. 2010;1358:172–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hillman CH, Buck SM, Themanson JR, Pontifex MB, Castelli DM. Aerobic fitness and cognitive development: Event-related brain potential and task performance indices of executive control in preadolescent children. Dev Psychol. 2009;45(1):114–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hillman CH, Castelli DM, Buck SM. Aerobic fitness and neurocognitive function in healthy preadolescent children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11):1967–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Esteban-Cornejo I, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Contreras-Rodriguez O, et al. A whole brain volumetric approach in overweight/obese children: Examining the association with different physical fitness components and academic performance. The ActiveBrains project. Neuroimage. 2017;159:346–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rodriguez-Ayllon M, Esteban-Cornejo I, Verdejo-Román J, et al. Physical fitness and white matter microstructure in children with overweight or obesity: the ActiveBrains project. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zavala-Crichton JP, Esteban-Cornejo I, Solis-Urra P, et al. Association of sedentary behavior with brain structure and intelligence in children with overweight or obesity: the ActiveBrains project. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thompson WH, Thelin EP, Lilja A, Bellander B-M, Fransson P. Functional resting-state fMRI connectivity correlates with serum levels of the S100B protein in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:1004–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McNorgan C, Smith GJ, Edwards ES. Integrating functional connectivity and MVPA through a multiple constraint network analysis. Neuroimage. 2020;208:116412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chai XJ, Ofen N, Gabrieli JD, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Selective development of anticorrelated networks in the intrinsic functional organization of the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014;26(3):501–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Emmanuel M, Bokor BR. Tanner Stages: StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Birnbaum AS, Lytle LA, Murray DM, Story M, Perry CL, Boutelle KN. Survey development for assessing correlates of young adolescents’ eating. Am J Health Behav. 2002;26(4):284–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Van Dijk KR, Hedden T, Venkataraman A, Evans KC, Lazar SW, Buckner RL. Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103(1):297–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Durston S, Tottenham NT, Thomas KM, et al. Differential patterns of striatal activation in young children with and without ADHD. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53(10):871–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Beyer F, Prehn K, Wüsten KA, et al. Weight loss reduces head motion: Revisiting a major confound in neuroimaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(9):2490–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ekhtiari H, Kuplicki R, Yeh H-w, Paulus MP. Physical characteristics not psychological state or trait characteristics predict motion during resting state fMRI. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Van Dijk KR, Sabuncu MR, Buckner RL. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage. 2012;59(1):431–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Growth Charts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Goran M, Fields DA, Hunter GR, Herd SL, Weinsier RL. Total body fat does not influence maximal aerobic capacity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(7):841–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Nieman DC, Kang J. Children’s OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion: walking/running evaluation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(1):139–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Imboden MT, Kaminsky LA, Peterman JE, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness normalized to fat-free mass and mortality risk. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52(7):1532–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Larsen RJ, Raine LB, Hillman CH, Kramer AF, Cohen NJ, Barbey AK. Body mass and cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with altered brain metabolism. Metab Brain Dis. 2020;35(6):999–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Logan NE, Raine LB, Drollette ES, et al. The differential relationship of an afterschool physical activity intervention on brain function and cognition in children with obesity and their normal weight peers. Pediatr Obes. 2021;16(2):e12708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007;37(1):90–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guell X, Arnold Anteraper S, Gardner AJ, et al. Functional connectivity changes in retired Rugby League players: a data-driven functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(16):1788–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(3):1125–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(28):7900–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford publications; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moreno-Lopez L, Contreras-Rodriguez O, Soriano-Mas C, Stamatakis EA, Verdejo-Garcia A. Disrupted functional connectivity in adolescent obesity. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;12:262–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Salvan P, Wassenaar T, Wheatley C, et al. Multimodal imaging brain markers in early adolescence are linked with a physically active lifestyle. J Neurosci. 2021;41(5):1092–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(6):697–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Friston K, Frith C, Liddle P, Frackowiak R. Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13(1):5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chaddock-Heyman L, Weng TB, Kienzler C, et al. Brain Network Modularity Predicts Improvements in Cognitive and Scholastic Performance in Children Involved in a Physical Activity Intervention. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Esteban-Cornejo I, Stillman CM, Rodriguez-Ayllon M, et al. Physical fitness, hippocampal functional connectivity and academic performance in children with overweight/obesity: The ActiveBrains project. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;91:284–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data Tables

Table S1: Mediation Model with adiposity (BMI, VAT) as the predictor, VO2-FF (ml/kg(lean)/min) as the mediator, and RSFC values as the dependent outcome. ADE, average direct effect; ACME, average causal mediation effect.

Table S2: Mediation Model with VO2-FF (ml/kg(lean)/min) as the predictor, BMI as the mediator, and RSFC values as the dependent outcome. ADE, average direct effect; ACME, average causal mediation effect.

Table S3: Mediation Model with VO2-FF (ml/kg(lean)/min) as the predictor, VAT (g) as the mediator, and RSFC values as the dependent outcome. ADE, average direct effect; ACME, average causal mediation effect.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request due to the need for a formal data sharing agreement.

RESOURCES