Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;5(9):e2231911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31911

Table 1. Number of ERIC Domains Among Significantly Successful Improvement Programs.

Domain title ERIC domain No. Occurrence, No. (%) (N = 49) Example of strategy from literature (source)
Use of evaluative and iterative strategies 1 49 (100) Develop an implementation blueprint that summarizes the intervention purpose; scope of change; timeframe and intervention milestones; and defines measures of performance and success (Anderson et al,40 2017)
Provision of interactive assistance 2 6 (12.2) Implement electronic order sets (Anderson et al,40 2017) and e-pathways (Talevski et al,45 2020)
Adapt and tailor to context 3 17 (34.7) Prioritize surgery of older patients with hip fractures and tailor timing of procedures to within the first hours after admission (Sánchez-Hernández et al,47 2016)
Development of stakeholder interrelationships 4 35 (71.4) Implement combined multidisciplinary and comanagement systems (VanTienderen et al,75 2021)
Training and education of stakeholders 5 3 (6.1) Recruit integrated care managers to improve care path compliance and coordination of care (Heyzer et al,60 2021)
Support of clinicians 6 33 (67.3) Hire a designated lean manager in the orthopaedic department to assess processes involved with quality improvement project, including tracking new hip fracture patients (Sayeed et al,76 2018)
Engagement with consumers 7 1 (2) In the event that a patient was unable to give consent, delay surgery only when efforts to contact the immediate family failed (Kosy et al,65 2013)
Use of financial strategies 8 6 (12.2) Incentivize meeting a 24-hour, 48-hour, or other target time for surgical fixation of hip fractures via a reimbursement system (Uri et al,46 2020)
Change of infrastructure 9 10 (20.4) Designate a dedicated “out of hours” trauma room (Keren et al,59 2017)

Abbreviation: ERIC, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change.