Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis of the association between serum Mternl levels and adverse lipid profile.

OR (95% CI)	Per rank decrease			P for trend	Per 1-unit decrease	P
	Tertile 3	Tertile 2	Tertile 1
Hyper-TG
Model 1	1.00 (Ref)	2.981 (1.134, 7.831)	6.312 (2.472, 16.115)	0.001	1.019 (1.010, 1.029)	< 0.001
Model 2	1.00 (Ref)	3.734 (1.356, 10.280)	8.052 (2.974, 21.800)	< 0.001	1.020 (1.011, 1.031)	< 0.001
Model 3	1.00 (Ref)	3.462 (1.134, 10.571)	6.310 (2.067, 19.259)	0.005	1.022 (1.010, 1.034)	< 0.001
Hyper-TC
Model 1	1.00 (Ref)	2.139 (1.022, 4.478)	2.891 (1.373, 6.086)	0.017	1.007 (1.002, 1.013)	0.011
Model 2	1.00 (Ref)	2.218 (1.037, 4.743)	3.147 (1.462, 6.775)	0.012	1.008 (1.002, 1.014)	0.008
Model 3	1.00 (Ref)	2.708 (1.153, 6.356)	4.570 (1.816, 11.499)	0.005	1.010 (1.003, 1.017)	0.005
Hypo-HDL
Model 1	1.00 (Ref)	0.672 (0.250, 1.810)	0.486 (0.167, 1.412)	0.400	1.004 (0.996, 1.013)	0.289
Model 2	1.00 (Ref)	0.907 (0.283, 2.912)	1.701 (0.604, 4.789)	0.448	1.005 (0.997, 1.013)	0.229
Model 3	1.00 (Ref)	1.111 (0.242, 5.088)	1.466 (0.334, 6.436)	0.865	1.004 (0.992, 1.015)	0.494
Hyper-LDL
Model 1	1.00 (Ref)	0.723 (0.235, 2.223)	1.487 (0.553, 4.003)	0.109	1.006 (1.001, 1.012)	0.028
Model 2	1.00 (Ref)	1.158 (0.543, 2.469)	2.269 (1.070, 4.808)	0.070	1.007 (1.001, 1.013)	0.016
Model 3	1.00 (Ref)	1.384 (0.582, 3.289)	3.224 (1.306, 7.959)	0.029	1.009 (1.001, 1.016)	0.019

Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age and sex; Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, BMI, diabetes, HOMA-IR, and eGFR. Bold indicates P value < 0.05.