Table 2.

Comparison of results for proposed methods when $n\ge p$

$\xi$	Prior	Best $T_{{\rm Y}}$	FDR	TPR	$D_{\mathit{TPR}}$	$D_{\mathit{FDR}}$
n=100, p=50
1	EXP	$T_{2b}$	0.01 (0.073)	0.019 (0.137)	− 0.981, BHq	− 0.077
	RSK	$T_{2b}$	0.009 (0.069)	0.017 (0.129)	− 0.983, BHq	− 0.079
	NOR	$T_{2b}$	0.008 (0.065)	0.014 (0.116)	− 0.986, BHq	− 0.08
2.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.939 (0.116)	− 0.061, BHq	− 0.088
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.939 (0.115)	− 0.061, BHq	− 0.088
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.939 (0.116)	− 0.061, BHq	− 0.088
3.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.939 (0.12)	− 0.061, BHq	− 0.088
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.938 (0.12)	− 0.062, BHq	− 0.088
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.938 (0.121)	− 0.062, BHq	− 0.088
n=200, p=50
1	EXP	$T_{2b}$	0.013 (0.083)	0.024 (0.153)	− 0.976, BHq	− 0.075
	RSK	$T_{2b}$	0.013 (0.084)	0.024 (0.152)	− 0.976, BHq	− 0.074
	NOR	$T_{2b}$	0.013 (0.083)	0.024 (0.153)	− 0.976, BHq	− 0.074
2.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.996 (0.029)	− 0.004, BHq	− 0.087
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.996 (0.029)	− 0.004, BHq	− 0.087
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.995 (0.031)	− 0.005, BHq	− 0.087
3.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.997 (0.027)	− 0.003, BHq	− 0.087
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.997 (0.026)	− 0.003, BHq	− 0.087
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.997 (0.026)	− 0.003, BHq	− 0.087
n=200, p=100
1	EXP	$T_{2b}$	0.045 (0.083)	0.588 (0.489)	− 0.412, BHq	− 0.048
	RSK	$T_{2b}$	0.046 (0.084)	0.593 (0.487)	− 0.407, BHq	− 0.047
	NOR	$T_{2b}$	0.045 (0.084)	0.585 (0.49)	− 0.415, BHq	− 0.048
2.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.946 (0.081)	− 0.054, BHq	− 0.092
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.946 (0.081)	− 0.054, BHq	− 0.092
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.946 (0.081)	− 0.054, BHq	− 0.092
3.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.947 (0.081)	− 0.053, BHq	− 0.092
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.947 (0.081)	− 0.053, BHq	− 0.092
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.946 (0.082)	− 0.054, BHq	− 0.092