Table 3.

Comparison of results for proposed methods when $n=p$

$\xi$	Prior	Best $T_{{\rm Y}}$	FDR	TPR	$D_{\mathit{TPR}}$	$D_{\mathit{FDR}}$
n=50, p=50
1	EXP	$T_{2b}$	0.014 (0.089)	0.025 (0.156)	0.005, LCDK+	0.003
	RSK	$T_{2b}$	0.016 (0.093)	0.028 (0.165)	0.008, LCDK+	0.005
	NOR	$T_{2b}$	0.014 (0.087)	0.024 (0.152)	0.004, LCDK+	0.003
2.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.999 (0.015)	0.977, LCDK+	− 0.012
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.999 (0.015)	0.977, LCDK+	− 0.012
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	0.99 (0.05)	0.968, LCDK+	− 0.012
3.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0.009)	1 (0)	0.979, LCDK+	− 0.011
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0.009)	1 (0)	0.979, LCDK+	− 0.011
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0.005)	1 (0)	0.979, LCDK+	− 0.011
n=100, p=100
1	EXP	$T_{2b}$	0.081 (0.103)	0.959 (0.196)	− 0.035, LCDK+	0.005
	RSK	$T_{2b}$	0.08 (0.103)	0.96 (0.194)	− 0.034, LCDK+	0.005
	NOR	$T_{2b}$	0.081 (0.104)	0.958 (0.199)	− 0.036, LCDK+	0.005
2.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	−  0.076
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.076
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.076
3.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.076
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.076
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.076
n=200, p=200
1	EXP	$T_{2b}$	0.084 (0.076)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	0.001
	RSK	$T_{2b}$	0.084 (0.076)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	0.001
	NOR	$T_{2b}$	0.085 (0.078)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	0.002
2.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.082
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.082
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.082
3.5	EXP	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.082
	RSK	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.082
	NOR	$T_{1a}$	0 (0)	1 (0)	0, LCDK+	− 0.082