Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2022 May 10;23:449–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111621-102737

Table 1.

Common features of reactive versus preemptive pharmacogenomic testing

Feature Reactive pharmacogenomic testing Preemptive pharmacogenomic testing
Timing of ordering Ordered as drug therapy is initiated or being contemplated Ordered independently of medication use
Turnaround time Often ~5–7 business days; can be a point-of-care test (only available for a limited set of genes; use is not widespread) Test result already available in the electronic health record at the time of prescribing; results can be reused as other medications are prescribed
Prescriber knowledge about pharmacogenomics Requires knowledge about which test to order Clinical decision support alerts prompt prescriber for action
Cost Routinely found to be cost effective or cost saving, but expensive relative to the potential benefit of one therapeutic decision Approximately equivalent to the cost of two single-gene tests, and provides cost savings over years with continued use of genetic information for medication use
General testing platform used Often single gene (one pharmacogenomic test result) Often array based (multiple pharmacogenomic test results)