Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 15;18:2083–2093. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S377261

Table 3.

Respondent Perspectives on Point-of-Care Devices and Saliva Lithium Monitoring

Query n (%)
Would a point-of-care device be useful?
 Not useful 2 (3.1)
 Somewhat useful 13 (20.0)
 Quite useful 18 (27.7)
 Very useful 30 (46.2)
 Undecided 2 (3.1)
When do you think a point-of-care device be useful?
 When changing the dose 55 (87.3)
 Monitoring for medication adherence 50 (79.4)
 Monitoring side effects 36 (57.1)
 In patients who do not tolerate venipuncture 48 (76.2)
 Othera 5 (7.9)
Would you find it useful if lithium levels could be effectively monitored in saliva instead of blood?
 Yes 64 (98.5)
 No 1 (1.5)
If saliva samples could be collected at home and dropped off or mailed in for lithium monitoring, would you find this useful for your patients and hence your clinical decision making?
 Not at all 3 (4.6)
 Somewhat useful 21 (32.3)
 Quite useful 13 (20.0)
 Very useful 27 (41.5)
 Undecided 1 (1.5)
When do you think at-home saliva collection would be useful?
 Changing the dose 46 (75.4)
 Monitoring for medication adherence 40 (65.6)
 Monitoring side effects 36 (59.0)
 In patients who do not tolerate venipuncture 51 (83.6)
 For patients with long commutes or to avoid coming into the clinic 49 (80.3)
 Otherb 5 (8.2)
Would you be willing to provide patients with at-home saliva collection kits to drop off or mail in samples for lithium analysis?
 Yes 61 (93.8)
 No 4 (6.2)
How compliant do you think patients would be with at-home saliva collection?
 Not at all 0 (0.0)
 Somewhat compliant 23 (35.4)
 Quite compliant 27 (41.5)
 Very compliant 11 (16.9)
 Undecided 4 (6.2)

Notes: aOther responses were: patient not adherent with lab requests; just being able to get a lab done; any time a patient is not hospitalized; during pregnancy. bOther responses were: when patients are making changes that could change their levels; just being able to get a lab done; for reliable patients; during pregnancy.