Table 3.
Query | n (%) |
---|---|
Would a point-of-care device be useful? | |
Not useful | 2 (3.1) |
Somewhat useful | 13 (20.0) |
Quite useful | 18 (27.7) |
Very useful | 30 (46.2) |
Undecided | 2 (3.1) |
When do you think a point-of-care device be useful? | |
When changing the dose | 55 (87.3) |
Monitoring for medication adherence | 50 (79.4) |
Monitoring side effects | 36 (57.1) |
In patients who do not tolerate venipuncture | 48 (76.2) |
Othera | 5 (7.9) |
Would you find it useful if lithium levels could be effectively monitored in saliva instead of blood? | |
Yes | 64 (98.5) |
No | 1 (1.5) |
If saliva samples could be collected at home and dropped off or mailed in for lithium monitoring, would you find this useful for your patients and hence your clinical decision making? | |
Not at all | 3 (4.6) |
Somewhat useful | 21 (32.3) |
Quite useful | 13 (20.0) |
Very useful | 27 (41.5) |
Undecided | 1 (1.5) |
When do you think at-home saliva collection would be useful? | |
Changing the dose | 46 (75.4) |
Monitoring for medication adherence | 40 (65.6) |
Monitoring side effects | 36 (59.0) |
In patients who do not tolerate venipuncture | 51 (83.6) |
For patients with long commutes or to avoid coming into the clinic | 49 (80.3) |
Otherb | 5 (8.2) |
Would you be willing to provide patients with at-home saliva collection kits to drop off or mail in samples for lithium analysis? | |
Yes | 61 (93.8) |
No | 4 (6.2) |
How compliant do you think patients would be with at-home saliva collection? | |
Not at all | 0 (0.0) |
Somewhat compliant | 23 (35.4) |
Quite compliant | 27 (41.5) |
Very compliant | 11 (16.9) |
Undecided | 4 (6.2) |
Notes: aOther responses were: patient not adherent with lab requests; just being able to get a lab done; any time a patient is not hospitalized; during pregnancy. bOther responses were: when patients are making changes that could change their levels; just being able to get a lab done; for reliable patients; during pregnancy.