Abstract
Urbanization influences food quality and availability for many avian species, with increased access to human refuse and food subsidies in built environments. In relation to such nutritional intakes and their presumed impact on microbes harbored in the intestinal tract and metabolic profiles of host physiological systems, our overall knowledge of the role of gut microbiome (GM) and metabolomic expression in the avian host lags far behind our understanding of mammals. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to examine the potential differential effect of an urban modeled versus control (i.e., bird seed) diet on the GM, the metabolic profiles of plasma, liver, adipose, kidney, and muscle tissues, and circulating endotoxin and inflammatory factors in urban-caught mourning doves (Zenaida macroura). We hypothesized that the urban diet would differently impact the profiles of the GM and tissue metabolomes and increase plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and proinflammatory factors compared with animals fed a seed diet. After a 4-wk-diet period, contents of the large intestine were sequenced to profile the microbiome, metabolomic analyses were performed on plasma and tissue homogenates, and circulating LPS and inflammatory markers were assessed. The composition of the GM was significantly dissimilar between diets, with greater abundance of Erysipelatoclostridiaceae, Sanguibacteraceae, Oribacterium, and Sanguibacter and decreased circulating LPS in the urban-fed birds. These differences were largely not reflected in the surveyed metabolomes and plasma inflammatory markers. This research supports the notion that the microbial composition in urban doves is impacted by diet, though may only weakly associate with host physiology.
Keywords: birds, gut microbiome, lipopolysaccharide, metabolomics, urban
INTRODUCTION
Research across several animal species suggest a diet high in refined carbohydrates, saturated fats, and salt promotes deleterious alterations in the composition and function of microbes harbored in the digestive tract (1, 2). This dietary pattern has also been associated with increased systemic inflammation, which is mediated, in part, through alterations in the gut microbiome (GM) (1, 3, 4). The GM plays a vital role in regulating the intestinal epithelial barrier and compositional alterations can increase the abundance of Gram-negative bacteria that release lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (5). LPS is an endotoxin with different serotypes (i.e., toxicity of the lipid A portion of LPS) harboring the ability to impair tight junction proteins and increase intestinal permeability (6). Ultimately, bacterial translocation from increased intestinal permeability can result in an inflammatory response and metabolic insulin resistance (7). Emerging evidence from animal and human studies has suggested an important role of the GM in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and other metabolic diseases (8–10). In relation, urbanization influences food quality and availability for many wild animal species, which may promote a shift in the GM that could ultimately impact host physiology. As a model organism, birds living in urban environments have access to a variety of food subsidies not available to rural birds such as bread, popcorn, restaurant waste, and other anthropogenic foods (11, 12).
Across multiple animal species, it is becoming increasingly evident that the GM plays an important role in modulating host physiology (13). In relation, the suite of small molecules present in biological samples (known as the metabolome) can complement GM data and may reveal important metabolic signatures from environmental stimuli (14, 15). Because of the unique attributes of their energetic metabolism and physiology, birds have been suggested as pathology-free models of T2D (16). In support, birds have plasma glucose concentrations 1.5-2 times that of similar sized mammals and yet can forego the regulation of glucose by insulin without any adverse effects (17). Furthermore, most avian species appear to possess mechanisms to enhance fatty acid transport and oxidation during flight (18, 19). These traits are similar to the way energy is utilized by humans with diabetes who are unable to efficiently utilize glucose and consequently rely more on fatty acid oxidation when carbohydrates are plentiful (20). Previous research has found mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) fed either a refined-carbohydrate or high-fat diet over a 4-wk period do not develop metabolic complications that mammals normally show in response to consumption of these diets (21, 22). In addition, metabolomics analyses of plasma, liver, pectoralis muscle, and kidney revealed significant differences in several individual metabolites but no changes in overall metabolic pathways (21, 22). These findings suggest that mourning doves may alter their nutritional physiology to avoid metabolic complications. In contrast to the metabolome, examination of the GM of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) from rural and urban environments revealed enrichment of Proteobacteria in the urban birds, which are implicated in several mammalian intestinal and extraintestinal diseases (23). Moreover, and more recently, we reported impaired vasodilation in mourning doves fed a diet modeled on food available in an urban environment compared with a bird seed diet (24). Urbanization influences food quality and availability for many wild species and has been suggested to promote a shift in the GM that could impact other nutritional physiology outcomes. Indeed, research exploring the consumption of foods available in urban environments by birds has reported significant shifts in the GM and associated physiology (25–28).
Overall, our knowledge of the role of intestinal microbes in avian hosts lags far behind our understanding of mammalian systems. However, constitutional taxa detected from birds using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing have also been identified in mammalian microbial communities, suggesting that birds may harbor some shared microbial milieu (29). Moreover, in a large comparative study across 59 bird species, diet was reported to be a significant variable in explaining GM composition (30). However, more recent work has downplayed the influence of diet on the avian GM (31). Regardless, much of the work conducted in this area is cross-sectional in nature and lacks the rigor of a controlled feeding trial, which enables researchers to control for other environmental variables (e.g., pathogens, pollution, stress, etc.). Such work is critical for allowing us to better understand the role of diet in the urban environment. Therefore, as a continuation of our research we investigated the potential differential effects of an urban-type (i.e., bird seeds mixed with French fries; herein “Urban” diet) versus control (i.e., bird seeds; herein “Seed” diet) diet on the GM, metabolic profile (plasma, liver, adipose, kidney, and muscle), and circulating endotoxin and inflammatory factors in mourning doves. The common Western diet food, French fries, was used as birds have ready access to this food source in urban environments. We hypothesized that the Urban diet would differently impact the profiles of GM and tissue metabolomes, and increase plasma LPS and proinflammatory factors, compared with animals fed a Seed diet.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and Diets
Blood and tissue samples and contents from the lower intestines from a total of 13 birds were provided from a prior study comparing Seed and Urban diets in mourning doves (24). Briefly, 16 adult male and female mourning doves (body mass: 110–130 g) were captured from the ASU Tempe campus, AZ (33°25'11.5''N–111°55'55.6''W; altitude: 365 m), using a walk-in style funnel trap baited with wild-bird seeds, as previously described (21, 22, 24). All animals were captured during the same hours and were transported to the ASU Department of Animal Care and Technology facility located on the Tempe campus in individual cloth bags with drawstring closures to minimize stress. Birds were housed individually to prevent fighting and were exposed to a 14:10 h light/dark cycle and an ambient temperature of 77 ± 4°F (∼25°C) to mimic natural conditions at the time of capture. All study protocols were approved by the ASU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted under appropriate state and federal scientific collecting permits.
After a 2-wk acclimation period, birds in the original study were divided randomly and fed either an Urban diet (4 male and 4 females) or a Seed only diet (4 males and 4 females) for 4 wk, as previously described (24). Two birds died in captivity, and one was released due to poor housing acclimation resulting in 13 animals at the end of the study (Urban diet: 3 males and 4 females; Seed diet: 2 males and 4 females). Veterinarian examination (necropsy) suggested the two deaths may have been due to preexisting conditions. The Urban diet consisted of a 50:50 mixture of nutritionally balanced dove seeds mixed with mashed French fries. French fries were selected as they are an anthropogenic food item and prevalent in urban areas (32). The seed-to-French fry ratio was based on tolerability during the acclimation period and to model the expected mixed diet of birds in these environments. An overview of the study design is outlined in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.

Schematic of study design. A: a total of 16 male and female mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) were captured in Tempe, AZ. B: after capture, birds where acclimatized to their conditions for a 2-wk period. Next, birds were randomly assigned to the Urban diet (4 male and 4 females) or a Seed only diet (4 males and 4 females). Two birds died and one was released, leaving 7 birds in the Urban diet group and 6 in the Seed diet group. C: the Urban diet consisted of a 50:50 ratio of French fry to seed based on tolerability. The Seed diet consisted of bird seed. D: after the intervention, contents of the large intestine were removed, and microbial DNA was extracted for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Plasma samples were assessed for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and inflammatory cytokine concentrations. Plasma, liver, kidney, adipose, and pectoralis and gastrocnemius muscle samples were taken, and metabolomics analyses were performed. LC-MS, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.
Intestinal Content Sample Collection and Extraction
After birds were euthanized, contents of the large intestine (proximal to the cecum) were harvested. Although we understand the disadvantages of lacking a baseline measurement, it was not feasible to collect intestinal samples in birds without highly invasive techniques thus preventing pre- and postmeasures within the same individual. Although cloacal swab or fecal samples have been used in the past, they are often unreliable and less accurate compared with the methods used presently and outlined previously (33). Intestinal contents were stored at −80°C until processing for microbial analyses. Microbial genomic DNA was extracted from intestinal samples using a commercially available kit following the manufacturer's protocol (PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit, MoBio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). DNA concentration was quantified using a μDrop plate adaptor (Cat. No. N12391, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Cat. No. 5119300, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The OD260/OD280 ratio of all samples were ≥ 1.80, demonstrating purity.
Microbiome Analysis
Microbial DNA samples were sent to the Genomics Core Facility in the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University (Tempe, AZ) for bacterial community analysis via next-generation paired-end sequencing on the MiSeq Illumina platform. Specifically, amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was performed with the barcoded universal forward (515 F: GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and reverse (806 R: GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT) primers containing Illumina adapter sequences and following the protocol by the Earth Microbiome Project (EMP; https://earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/16s/) for the library preparation (34). PCR amplifications for each sample were done in triplicate, then pooled and quantified using Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen). A no-template control sample was included during the library preparation as a control for extraneous nucleic acid contamination. DNA (200 ng) per sample was pooled and then cleaned using QIA quick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). The pool was quantified by Illumina library Quantification Kit ABI Prism (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA). The DNA pool was diluted to a final concentration of 4 nM then denatured and diluted to a final concentration of 4 pM with a 25% of PhiX. Finally, the DNA library was loaded in the MiSeq Illumina and run using the version 2 module, 2 × 250 paired end, as per the directions of the manufacturer.
The resultant paired end, demultiplexed data were imported and analyzed using QIIME 2 software v. 2021.2 (35). Briefly, the sequencing generated 1,014,547 reads with a median of 77,450 reads per sample. After sequence quality plots were viewed based on 10,000 randomly selected reads, the first 25 bases of the forward and reverse reads were trimmed. Next, quality control was performed via the DADA2 denoise-paired method to remove low quality regions and construct a feature table using Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) (36). The feature-classifier plugin was used to classify ASVs taxonomically. A pretrained I Bayes machine-learning classifier was trained to differentiate taxa present in the 99% SILVA (version 138.1) reference set trimmed to 250 bp of the V4 hypervariable region (corresponding to the 515 F-806R primers). This classifier works by identifying k-mers that are diagnostic for particular taxonomic groups and using that information to predict the taxonomic affiliation of each ASV (37). A phylogenic tree was then constructed using the fragment-insertion plugin where the sequences were inserted into the SILVA identity reference tree backbone. Based on the inherent issues with rarefaction (38) and lack of a large difference in sequencing depth between samples, data was not rarefied (Supplemental Fig. S1; all Supplemental material is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20084090). A phyloseq (v1.38.0) object was created, and downstream analyses and visualizations were performed in R (v4.1.2). Sequences were removed including mitochondrial and plant DNA. In addition, ASVs that had a mean read count of less than 2 across all samples were removed.
α Diversity (intracommunity diversity) was measured using the Shannon index, which accounts for richness and evenness, and phylogenetic diversity (PD), which is a phylogenetically weighted measure of richness, using the phyloseq and picante (v1.8.2) packages, respectively. β Diversity (between-sample diversity) was calculated using the Aitchison distance rooted in a centered log ratio (CLR) transformation as it is robust to high levels of sparsity (39). Before transformation, a pseudocount of 1 was assigned, and CLR was performed using the package microbiome (v1.18.0). Differences in GM composition by diet group were visualized via a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the Aitchison distance. To predict the function of GM, data analysis was performed through the Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States 2 (PICRUSt2) pipeline (40). PICRUSt2 output was based on structured pathway mappings of Enzyme Commission gene families to the MetaCyc database (41).
Metabolomics Analysis
Plasma, liver, kidney, adipose, as well as pectoralis and gastrocnemius muscle samples were analyzed by the Arizona Metabolomics Laboratory core facility at Arizona State University using targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques as previously described (21, 22). Contents of the large intestine were not used in this analysis due to very low sample amount. All samples were thawed overnight at 4°C before extraction and analyses. Internal quality control samples were created by pooling aliquots of plasma from all animals. These quality controls were analyzed at the beginning, middle, and end of the analyses. Data for tissue samples were normalized to tissue mass before analyses. Sample analyses were carried out using an Agilent 1290 UPLC-6490 QQQ-MS (Santa Clara, CA) system equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The resulting data were statistically analyzed as described subsequently.
LPS Assay and Inflammatory Cytokine Analyses
After the 4-wk diet, plasma and tissue samples were collected, as previously described (24). LPS concentrations were quantified in duplicate using undiluted cardiac plasma samples that were collected at euthanasia for both diet treatments. A commercially available kit was used per the manufacturer’s protocol [Cat No. KTE30162, Abbkine, Inc., China; intra-assay coefficient variation (CV) <10%]. Undiluted plasma samples were sent to Eve Technologies (Calgary, Alberta, Canada) for assessment of inflammatory cytokines [interferon-α (IFNα), interferon-γ (IFNγ), interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-16, IL-21, macrophage inflammatory protein-1 β (MIP)-1β, MIP-3α, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)] using a 12-plex chicken cytokine array (Millipore, Burlington, MA).
Statistical Methods
For the GM, α diversity metrics were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests and β diversity was compared with permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; permutation n = 999) using the “adonis” function in the vegan package (v2.6.2). To compare dispersion, a permutation test for homogeneity in multivariate dispersion (PERMDISP) was conducted using the “betadisper” function in the vegan package. Next, to evaluate whether taxa frequencies in the two groups were equal, a Dirichlet-multinomial distribution was assumed and difference in the mean distribution of taxa was tested (accounting for the overdispersion). This was conducted at the phyla level after pooling rare taxa using the HMP package (v2.0.1) (42). For differential abundance testing, analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction was employed on taxa present in at least 30% of all the samples using the R package ANCOMBC (v1.4.0) (43). Adjustment for multiple testing was conducted with a Bonferroni correction. Features with a q value <0.05 were considered significant. Data generated from the PICRUSt2 pipeline was first filtered, retaining features present in at least 30% of all samples, and then assigned a pseudocount of 1 and transformed via CLR using the package microbiome. Analyses with Mann–Whitney U tests were then performed with P-value corrections performed using the Bonferroni approach (set at q < 0.05).
To determine significantly affected metabolites, data were log-transformed and subjected to independent sample t tests (Seed versus Urban diets) for all plasma and tissue samples using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). If data were not normally distributed, a Mann–Whitney U test was used. To adjust for multiple hypothesis testing, a false discovery rate (FDR) correction was used with a significance level of P < 0.05. The online software package MetaboAnalyst (metaboanalyst.ca) was used for the pathway analyses, integrating enrichment analyses, and pathway topology analyses of metabolomic data. The data were log10-transformed before model construction and the reported Holm adjusted P value was used to determine significance (44). The pathway analysis was calculated from the chicken metabolic pathway library. PubChem Open Chemistry Database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was used for interpretation of individual metabolites and metabolic pathways.
For LPS and inflammatory markers, normality statistics and probability plots were generated to test normality assumptions, and log transformations were performed as appropriate. Plasma data were analyzed by t tests (Urban vs. Seed diet). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Gut Microbiome Analysis Revealed Compositional Differences between Seed and Urban Diet Groups
Aitchison distance matrices of CLR transformed ASV counts were used to compare overall GM composition between the Seed and Urban diet groups. Significant clustering by diet was observed accounting for 11.37% of the explained proportion of variance [PERMANOVA: F(1,12) = 1.41, R2 = 0.11, P = 0.04; Fig. 2A]. Importantly, we did not detect a significant difference in group dispersion for Seed versus Urban diet groups [PERMDISP: F(1,12) = 0.80, P = 0.78], increasing our confidence that the significant compositional differences were not an artifact of variance in group dispersion. In comparison, there were no significant differences between Seed and Urban diet groups for the α diversity metrics, Shannon index, or PD (Mann–Whitney U test: P ≥ 0.37; Fig. 2, B and C; Supplemental Table S1). These findings suggest that diet was not associated with GM richness or evenness in these animals.
Figure 2.

A: the composition of microbiome samples from the contents of the large intestine differed significantly in mourning doves fed a Seed (n = 6) vs Urban (n = 7) diet, as visualized by principal components analysis (PCA) of Aitchison distances of centered log-ratio ASV counts (P = 0.04). Each point represents an individual sample, and the dashed lines are the 95% confidence intervals of the two diet groups. Significance testing was performed with permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; permutation n = 999). α-Diversity boxplots display, Shannon diversity (B) and phylogenic diversity (C) for Seed and Urban diet groups. Boxes denote the interquartile range (IQR) between the first and third quartiles, and the horizontal line defines the median. Significance was determined by Mann–Whitney U tests. NS, not significant.
Overall, we identified 178 unique ASVs after filtering providing taxonomy assignment for 75 features at the genus level (phylum: 9; class: 14; order: 28; family: 49). The predominant phyla across the two groups, irrespective of diet, were Firmicutes, Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Desulfobacteria (Fig. 3A). On evaluation of the distribution of phyla, we did not detect a significant difference between the Seed and Urban diets (xdc statistic = −29.51, P = 1.00). However, there was more visually apparent variation at the genus level. Of the top 10 most abundant genera, we noted several biologically notable taxa including, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Veillonella (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3.

A: the relative abundance (%) of bacterial phyla in microbiome samples from the contents of the large intestine in mourning doves separated by Seed and Urban diet groups. Each vertical bar represents a separate individual sample. Phyla with a median relative abundance of less than 1% are collapsed into the category “Other.” B: the relative abundance (%) of bacterial genera in microbiome samples from the contents of the large intestine in mourning doves separated by Seed and Urban diet groups. Each vertical bar represents a separate individual sample. Genera with a median relative abundance of less than 1% are collapsed into the category “Other.”
In relation to differential abundance testing, significance was detected at the family and genus levels, with several differentially abundant taxa between the two diet groups (ANCOMBC: q < 0.05). Specifically, families more abundant in the GM of birds fed the Urban diet included, Erysipelatoclostridiaceae [log-fold-change (log-FC) = 2.18] and Sanguibacteraceae (log-FC = 1.28; Fig. 4A; Supplemental Table S2). In the GM of Seed birds, Aeromonadaceae (log-FC = 1.23) was more abundant. At the genus level, two taxa were more abundant in the Urban diet group, including Oribacterium (log-FC = 2.06) and Sanguibacter (log-FC = 1.04), whereas three were more abundant in the Seed diet group, including Aeromonas (log-FC = 1.58), Galibacterium (log-FC = 2.51), and Solobacterium (log-FC = 2.04; Fig. 4B; Supplemental Table S2).
Figure 4.

A: differentially abundant features at the family level in the microbiome samples from the contents of the large intestine of mourning doves in Seed (n = 6) and Urban (n = 7) diet groups. B: differentially abundant features at the genus level in the microbiome samples from the contents of the large intestine of mourning doves in Seed (n = 6) and Urban (n = 7) diet groups. Points represent the log-fold-change (effect size) of individual bacterial features with only those with significant effect sizes (q < 0.05) are shown. A positive log-fold-change indicates that a feature is more abundant in individuals in the Urban diet group (orange), and a negative log-fold-change indicates a higher abundance in individuals in the Seed diet group (Blue). Bars represent standard error derived from the ANCOMBC model.
The PICRUSt 2 pipeline was implemented to predict the function of GM based on the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data. Overall, there were 342 predicted pathways, though after filtering and statistical testing only 4 pathways displayed significant differences in enrichment between the Seed and Urban Diet groups (Fig. 5, A–D). The Urban diet had greater abundance in “methanol oxidation to carbon dioxide,” whereas the Seed diet had greater abundance in “glucose and glucose-1-phosphate degradation,” “superpathway of UDP-glucose-derived O-antigen building blocks biosynthesis,” and “2-methylcitrate cycle I” (Mann–Whitney U test: q < 0.05).
Figure 5.

Boxplots displaying statistically significant differences in predicted metabolic pathways in the microbiome samples from the contents of the large intestine of mourning doves from the Seed and Urban diet groups: methanol oxidation to carbon dioxide (A), glucose and glucose-1-phosphate degradation (B), superpathway of UDP-glucose-derived O-antigen building blocks biosynthesis (C), and 2-methylcitrate cycle I (D). Pathway abundances were transformed by centered log-ratio (CLR) and statistical testing was performed via Mann–Whitney U tests with a Bonferroni multiple-comparison correction. Boxes denote the interquartile range (IQR) between the first and third quartiles, and the horizontal line defines the median. *q value < 0.05.
Metabolome Analysis of Host Tissues Displayed Subtle Differences between Seed and Urban Diet Groups
The metabolomics analyses yielded numerous metabolites per plasma/tissue sample (plasma: n = 154; pectoralis muscle: n = 123; liver: n = 125; kidney: n = 188; gastrocnemius muscle: n = 105; adipose: n = 92). Although 32 metabolites were initially significantly different between diet groups, after adjusting for multiple hypothesis testing, only one pectoralis muscle metabolite remained significantly different between diet groups (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. S2). The pathway enrichment analyses yielded numerous pathways per plasma and tissue samples (plasma: n = 49; pectoralis muscle: n = 50; liver: n = 44; kidney: n = 54; gastrocnemius muscle: n = 47; adipose: n = 45). Similarly, although nine pathways were initially significantly altered between diet groups, after adjusting for multiple hypothesis testing, only three pathways within pectoralis muscle remained significantly downregulated in the urban diet group (Table 2; Supplemental Fig. S3).
Table 1.
Altered plasma and tissue metabolites between diet groups
| P Value | q Value (FDR) | Fold-Change | Urban/Seed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | ||||
| Acrylamide | 0.001* | 0.220 | 0.54 | Down |
| 1-Methylhistidine | 0.008* | 0.609 | 0.64 | Down |
| Epinephrine | 0.009 | 0.609 | 0.68 | Down |
| Pantothenic acid | 0.019 | 0.883 | 1.61 | Up |
| 3-Hydroxybutyric acid | 0.029 | 1.000 | 0.72 | Down |
| Choline | 0.034 | 1.000 | 1.50 | Up |
| Pectoralis muscle | ||||
| Myoinositol | <0.001 | 0.017 | 0.80 | Down |
| Leucic acid | 0.016 | 0.822 | 0.62 | Down |
| Malate | 0.036 | 0.822 | 1.27 | Up |
| Liver | ||||
| Norvaline | 0.005* | 0.511 | 0.69 | Down |
| Benzoic acid | 0.008 | 0.511 | 0.79 | Down |
| Valine | 0.008* | 0.511 | 0.69 | Down |
| Proline | 0.014* | 0.658 | 0.77 | Down |
| Homoserine/threonine | 0.034 | 0.955 | 0.77 | Down |
| Threonine | 0.034 | 0.955 | 0.77 | Down |
| Isoleucine | 0.045 | 0.955 | 0.88 | Down |
| Muconic acid | 0.046 | 0.955 | 0.41 | Down |
| TMAO | 0.049 | 0.955 | 1.33 | Up |
| Kidney | ||||
| 2-deoxyadenosine | 0.001 | 0.212 | 1.24 | Up |
| Allopurinol | 0.019 | 0.929 | 1.41 | Up |
| Urocanic acid | 0.027 | 0.929 | 2.12 | Up |
| Phenylacetic acid | 0.034 | 0.929 | 1.11 | Up |
| F6P/G6P | 0.035* | 0.929 | 2.03 | Up |
| l-(−)-arabitol | 0.035* | 0.929 | 0.96 | Down |
| Succinate | 0.035* | 0.929 | 1.19 | Up |
| Uridine | 0.041 | 0.929 | 0.67 | Down |
| Gastrocnemius muscle | ||||
| 2-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 0.018 | 0.884 | 0.84 | Down |
| Citrate | 0.026 | 0.884 | 0.64 | Down |
| Betaine | 0.035* | 0.884 | 0.88 | Down |
| Adipose | ||||
| 4-Aminobutyric acid | 0.001 | 0.224 | 0.51 | Down |
| Carnitine | 0.007 | 0.663 | 0.61 | Down |
| Suberic acid | 0.020 | 1.000 | 0.60 | Down |
*P value determined via Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test; bold values are P < 0.05.
Table 2.
Altered metabolic pathways between diet groups
| Matched Compounds | P Value | Holm Adj. P Value | Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | ||||
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 3/19 | 0.020 | 0.988 | 0.025 |
| Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies | 1/5 | 0.029 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 1/35 | 0.034 | 1.000 | 0.030 |
| Pectoralis muscle | ||||
| Inositol phosphate metabolism | 1/30 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.080 |
| Phosphatidylinositol signaling system | 1/28 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism | 1/10 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Liver | ||||
| Valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis | 5/8 | 0.039 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
| Adipose | ||||
| Butanoate metabolism | 4/15 | 0.012 | 0.533 | 0.032 |
| Purine metabolism | 5/62 | 0.049 | 1.000 | 0.036 |
Kidney and gastrocnemius muscle revealed no significant pathways; bold values are P < 0.05.
Plasma LPS Was Elevated in Seed-Fed Compared with Urban-Fed Mourning Doves
Plasma LPS concentrations were significantly higher in the Seed diet group compared with the Urban diet group (51.01 ± 1.18 ng/L vs. 45.11 ± 1.02 ng/L; t test: P = 0.003; Table 3). No significance was detected for the tested inflammatory markers (P ≥ 0.161). Note, IFNα, IL-21, MIP-1β, and MIP-3α were not detected in many of the plasma samples and were therefore not included in the analysis. Furthermore, one animal in the Seed group displayed outlying values for nearly all of the inflammatory markers (Z-scores ≥ 2.5) and was removed from the analysis.
Table 3.
Plasma markers related to inflammation between groups
| Marker | Urban Diet | Seed Diet | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPS, ng/dL | 45.11 ± 1.01 | 51.01 ± 1.18 | 0.003 |
| IFNγ, pg/mL | 19.66 ± 12.01 | 7.24 ± 11.66 | 0.893 |
| IL-2, pg/mL | 1548.24 ± 200.61 | 1553.41 ± 175.58 | 0.989 |
| IL-6, pg/mL | 63.10 ± 41.34 | 19.45 ± 14.63 | 0.161 |
| IL-10, pg/mL | 11.28 ± 9.75 | 1.06 ± 1.05 | 0.283 |
| IL-16, pg/mL | 6.96 ± 2.08 | 4.29 ± 1.73 | 0.256 |
| M-CSF, pg/mL | 3.66 ± 2.55 | 1.46 ± 0.95 | 0.329 |
| RANTES, pg/mL | 5.55 ± 2.93 | 7.98 ± 3.83 | 0.620 |
| VEGF, pg/mL | 3.66 ± 2.54 | 1.45 ± 0.95 | 0.322 |
Data displayed as means ± SE; bold values are P < 0.05. IFNγ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin; LPS, plasma lipopolysaccharide; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
DISCUSSION
Urbanization influences food quality and availability for many wild species. In the current study, we hypothesized that such a diet could significantly influence the GM, host metabolome, and circulating LPS and inflammatory markers in urban mourning doves as many avian species have increased access to human refuse and food subsidies in urban areas. The GM of doves in the Urban and Seed diet groups showed significant dissimilarity in terms of microbial composition and significant differences in microbial abundance at the family and genus level. Moreover, and in contrast to our hypothesis, the Seed-fed doves had a significantly greater concentration of circulating LPS, though there were no differences in inflammatory markers between groups. These differences between the diet models implemented in this investigation suggest an urbanized versus a seed diet can promote differential shifts in the community profile and dynamics of the GM. Though, whether these differences could potentially impact other nutritional physiology outcomes were less apparent as a comprehensive survey of the metabolomes from plasma and tissue samples revealed a single significantly altered metabolite and three pathways, all within the pectoralis muscle samples.
Previous work from our laboratory examining the GM in house sparrows from rural and urban environments reported urban animals were more enriched with class- and order-level microbes from the phylum Proteobacteria, which are implicated in several mammalian intestinal and extraintestinal diseases (23, 45). In the present work, we did not note significant differences at these higher phylogenic levels, instead observing more subtle differences at the family and genus level between the Seed- and Urban-fed doves. This discordant finding between studies is of note and could be related to differences in the species, environmental exposure (experimental diet and laboratory housing vs. wild-caught), and the inclusion of only urban-caught doves in the present study. Indeed, the house sparrows from the previous study presumably had much longer exposure to their respective environments compared with the short-duration experimental diets in the present work. Moreover, the mourning doves used in this study were captured from an urban environment, and it is likely the diet provided to the birds in the Seed group was a greater departure from their normal nutritional intake compared with the mixed diet provided to the birds in the Urban group. Another consideration and important feature of the avian GM is the large variation that has been noted over multiple species (31, 46). It may be that birds are more apt to acquire microbes based on their environment and this transfer may be even more variable in birds of flight as they potentially have greater exposure to different environments (46). Although we acquired mourning doves used in the current study at a confined location, central to a large urban environment, it is likely they were exposed to disparate conditions before being captured. Therefore, future work should implement longer dietary intervention periods and, importantly, dietary change with ABA study designs [e.g., 1) seed diet to, 2) urban diet, 3) to seed diet, and vice versa] to observe if potential shifts in the GM alter and/or diminish.
Overall, diet-focused GM research indicates the gut microbes in adult animals are resilient, both in wild and controlled conditions (47–49). However, as Bodawatta and colleagues recently highlighted, the avian GM does appear to possess a greater degree of malleability to environmental and dietary changes, as compared with other species (50). The avian GM is also of particular interest due to the unique physiology of these animals. In the case of the doves used in our study, the capability of powered flight likely plays a large role in the contents and assembly of their GM. However, Song et al. (2020) recently assessed the gut microorganisms of ∼900 vertebrate species, including 315 mammals and 491 birds, and reported that bird’s GMs are only weakly correlated with host phylogeny and not correlated with host diet (31). Whereas mammals have a strong correlation to both diet and phylogeny. Song and colleagues speculated that the lack of correlation between host factors and microbial composition in birds may be partly a consequence of an overall lower level of specificity between microbial and host taxa than is found in mammals. This may be related to flight, as birds’ intestinal tracts are much shorter than those of comparably sized land mammals and carry far fewer bacteria, reducing the burden of holding extra weight (31). There is also the possibility that their digestive tracts are not providing the necessary food to bacteria to maintain the symbiotic (mutually beneficial) exchange that would make living there beneficial to bacteria. Although these findings partly align with our nonsignificant findings for microbial richness between groups, null findings do not appear to be the rule as previous observational research has implicated diet as a potential modulator of the avian GM, including animals from rural and urban environments (23, 25, 26, 28). More recent experimental work with house sparrows found that birds fed urban or rural-modeled diets for 6 wk significantly altered the diversity and taxonomic composition of the GM (27).
In the present study, we noted the GM from Urban-fed doves was significantly more abundant in Erysipelatoclostridiaceae and Sanguibacteraceae at the family level and Oribacterium and Sanguibacter at the genus level. Of note, Erysipelatoclostridiaceae is a butyrate-producing family of bacteria and has been reported to be enriched in Pekin ducks fed diets with high levels of dietary fiber (51). The genus Oribacterium, which is also from a butyrate-producing family (Lachnospiraceae), has been reported to be associated with obesity in humans (52). The other genus found to be more abundant in the Urban-fed group, Sanguibacter, was found to be among the dominant genera in wintering black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) (53). Increased abundance of these taxa is suggestive of greater energy extraction potential by the GM, though this was not reflected in physiological data previously described (e.g., plasma glucose and triglyceride concentration) (24). In comparison, the Seed diet group had greater abundance of the family, Aeromonadaceae, and genera, Aeromonas, Gallibacterium, and Solobacterium. The genus, Aeromonas, often found in aquatic environments and in soil, comprises mostly pathogenic species (54) and has been detected in several birds of flight, particularly in seabirds (55, 56). As part of the family, Aeromonadaceae, these bacteria are Gram-negative and contain LPS on their surface (54). Similarly, the Gram-negative Gallibacterium has been found to contain species that are pathogenic to chickens (e.g., Gallibacterium anatis) (57) and has been proposed to be an indicator of microbiome dysbiosis in songbirds (58). Overall, reconciling and understanding the differential findings between diet groups is difficult with the nonsignificant physiological data. In addition, the composition of the GMs between diet groups only showed modest separation. It may be that many of these microbes are symbionts or regular inhabitants in the GI tract of urban mourning doves. To better understand these differences, longer intervention durations are needed, as well as ABA study designs as noted previously. Such designs may reveal the observed differences in abundances at the family and genus levels are more transitory and therefore influence the host to a very small degree. When compared with mammals, the avian GM appears to have less complexity and specificity (31). Ultimately, these traits may make the avian GM more sensitive to changes in bacterial abundance and more apt to harbor transitory taxa (31, 59, 60). Regardless, our findings are of interest considering birds in built environments subsisting off urban-type foods may carry differential abundance of specific microbes compared with their rural counterparts.
Contrary to our initial hypothesis, the doves fed the Seed diet had significantly greater levels of circulating LPS in comparison to the Urban diet birds. Although a relatively unexplored area in avian research, prior work in goslings supported our original hypothesis as a relationship was found with increased circulating LPS from so-called dysbiosis and intestinal permeability and kidney injury (61). An important consideration with the birds in the present study may be related to prior environmental exposure. Although we did have a 2-wk control period before the animals were randomized into their respective diets, further work may consider longer control periods. Regardless, we did not find an increase in inflammation that might be expected with increased circulating endotoxin. The reason for this is unclear, however, the GM of doves in the Seed diet did display increased abundance of several Gram-negative taxa and the predicted metabolic pathway, “superpathway of UDP-glucose-derived O-antigen building blocks biosynthesis,” which forms specific sugar residues used by several taxa for incorporation in the repeated subunit O-antigen in the LPS structure (62). Another notable predicted pathway was “glucose and glucose-1-phosphate degradation,” suggestive of an enhanced ability to utilize sugars and their modes of utilization. In comparison, the Urban group displayed greater abundance in the “methanol oxidation to carbon dioxide” pathway. This finding was of note as the GM is now recognized as an important source of metabolic methanol (63). The water-soluble fiber pectin, found in fruits and vegetables (including potatoes), is degraded by the gut microbes to produce methanol (63). Although this analysis offers an exploration of the differences in potential functionalities of these two diet types, the data are inherently predictive. Moreover, although significant, the number of significant pathways were quite small and should be interpreted with caution.
With the exception of pectoralis muscle samples, metabolomics analyses revealed no significant differences in individual metabolites or pathways in plasma or several tissue samples (liver, kidney, adipose, and gastrocnemius muscle) between diet groups following multiple hypothesis testing. Of note, the metabolite myoinositol was decreased in pectoralis muscles from doves fed the Urban diet as compared with the seed diet. Myoinositol is involved in numerous metabolic pathways in poultry (lipid signaling, osmolarity, glucose, and insulin metabolism) and thus, it is possible that the decrease of myoinositol observed in the Urban diet pectoralis muscle could affect glucose metabolism in the muscle (64). Since seeds are a rich source of dietary myoinositol (65), the observed decrease in muscle myoinositol could be related to the decreased proportion of seeds provided in the Urban diet. Similarly, the pathway enrichment analyses revealed only three low-impact pathways that were downregulated in pectoralis muscles from doves fed the Urban diet as compared with birds fed the seed diet. Moreover, since all three pathways only had one metabolite matched to them for the analyses, which was also the only altered metabolite (myoinositol), this further demonstrates that the main metabolite altered by the Urban diet is myoinositol and its associated pathways in pectoralis muscles. The minimal differences observed in the metabolites align with the initial results from this study (24), where body mass and numerous nutritional physiology markers were likewise not altered between diet groups.
Perspectives and Significance
In summary, data generated from this study show a diet modeled after what birds in urban environments plausibly consume significantly alters the community of microbes harbored in the large intestine. The Urban diet fed doves had greater abundance of potentially energy harvesting taxa; however, alterations as a result of this were not reflected in metabolomic analyses from several tissues, in addition to circulating LPS and inflammatory markers. Indeed, contrary to our hypothesis, doves feed the diet of seeds had a significantly greater concentration of circulating LPS in comparison to the Urban diet fed doves. This may have been due to prior environmental exposures and deserves future investigation as this elevation did not appear to negatively impact the health of these animals. In addition, metabolites and metabolite-produced metabolic pathway analysis revealed largely no difference between diet groups, with the exception of decreased pectoralis myoinositol in the doves fed the Urban diet. Although our analysis was limited by a smaller sample size and study length, our research supports the notion that the microbial composition in doves is impacted by diet, though may only weakly associate with host physiology.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing data for all samples have been deposited in the open-source repository, Sequence Read Archive (SRA), under the NCBI BioProject number, PRJNA849645 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra).
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Supplemental Figs. S1 and S2 and Supplemental Tables S1–S3: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20084090.
GRANTS
This secondary study was funded by a grant from the Graduate & Professional Student Association at ASU (Grant ID: 149398 to A.E.M.). The original study was funded in part by the ASU School of Life Sciences/Office of Knowledge Enterprise Development–Research Investment Initiative, Central Arizona Phoenix Long Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER) Graduate Student Research Grant funded via the National Science Foundation (1832016), and ASU Barrett, The Honors College.
DISCLOSURES
A.E.M. is employed by Isagenix International LLC. All authors have no financial interests regarding the content of this manuscript. None of other authors have any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to disclose.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
A.E.M., A.J.B., and K.L.S. conceived and designed research; A.E.M., A.J.B., and K.L.S. performed experiments; A.E.M. and K.L.S. analyzed data; A.E.M., A.J.B., and K.L.S. interpreted results of experiments; A.E.M. and A.J.B. prepared figures; A.E.M. and K.L.S. drafted manuscript; A.E.M., A.J.B., and K.L.S. edited and revised manuscript; A.E.M., A.J.B., and K.L.S. approved final version of manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Michael Renner and Lana Kayata (ASU) for animal husbandry and tissue collections during the initial study. The authors additionally acknowledge resources and support from the Genomics and Bioinformatics Cores, as part of the Biosciences Core Facilities at Arizona State University (Tempe, AZ). Figure 1 was created using Biorender.com.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bortolin RC, Vargas AR, Gasparotto J, Chaves PR, Schnorr CE, Martinello KB, Silveira AK, Rabelo TK, Gelain DP, Moreira JCF. A new animal diet based on human Western diet is a robust diet-induced obesity model: comparison to high-fat and cafeteria diets in term of metabolic and gut microbiota disruption. Int J Obes (Lond) 42: 525–534, 2018. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zinöcker MK, Lindseth IA. The western diet–microbiome-host interaction and its role in metabolic disease. Nutrients 10: 365, 2018. doi: 10.3390/nu10030365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Agus A, Denizot J, Thévenot J, Martinez-Medina M, Massier S, Sauvanet P, Bernalier-Donadille A, Denis S, Hofman P, Bonnet R, Billard E, Barnich N. Western diet induces a shift in microbiota composition enhancing susceptibility to adherent-invasive E. coli infection and intestinal inflammation. Sci Rep 6: 19032, 2016. doi: 10.1038/srep19032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Volynets V, Louis S, Pretz D, Lang L, Ostaff MJ, Wehkamp J, Bischoff SC. Intestinal barrier function and the gut microbiome are differentially affected in mice fed a western-style diet or drinking water supplemented with fructose. J Nutr 147: 770–780, 2017. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.242859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Vancamelbeke M, Vermeire S. The intestinal barrier: a fundamental role in health and disease. Expert Rev Gastroent 11: 1–14, 2017. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1343143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mohr AE, Crawford M, Jasbi P, Fessler S, Sweazea KL. Lipopolysaccharide and the gut microbiota: considering structural variation. Febs Lett 596: 849–875, 2022. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bischoff SC, Barbara G, Buurman W, Ockhuizen T, Schulzke J-D, Serino M, Tilg H, Watson A, Wells JM. Intestinal permeability—a new target for disease prevention and therapy. Bmc Gastroenterol 14: 189, 2014. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Forslund K, Hildebrand F, Nielsen T, Falony G, Le Chatelier E, Sunagawa S, Prifti E, Vieira-Silva S, Gudmundsdottir V, Pedersen HK, Arumugam M, Kristiansen K, Voigt AY, Vestergaard H, Hercog R, Costea PI, Kultima JR, Li J, Jørgensen T, Levenez F, Dore J; MetaHIT consortium Nielsen HB, Brunak S, Raes J, Hansen T, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P, Pedersen O. Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature 528: 262–266, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nature15766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490: 55–60, 2012. doi: 10.1038/nature11450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vrieze A, Nood EV, Holleman F, Salojärvi J, Kootte RS, Bartelsman JFWM, Dallinga–Thie GM, Ackermans MT, Serlie MJ, Oozeer R, Derrien M, Druesne A, Vlieg J, Bloks VW, Groen AK, Heilig HGHJ, Zoetendal EG, Stroes ES, Vos W. D, Hoekstra JBL, Nieuwdorp M. Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Gastroenterology 143: 913–916.e7, 2012. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Oro D, Genovart M, Tavecchia G, Fowler MS, Martínez‐Abraín A. Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecol Lett 16: 1501–1514, 2013. doi: 10.1111/ele.12187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, Stanley MC. Supplementary feeding restructures urban bird communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: E2648–E2657, 2015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501489112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. McFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TCG, Carey HV, Domazet-Lošo T, Douglas AE, Dubilier N, Eberl G, Fukami T, Gilbert SF, Hentschel U, King N, Kjelleberg S, Knoll AH, Kremer N, Mazmanian SK, Metcalf JL, Nealson K, Pierce NE, Rawls JF, Reid A, Ruby EG, Rumpho M, Sanders JG, Tautz D, Wernegreen JJ. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 3229–3236, 2013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218525110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, Schultz PG, Lesley SA, Peters EC, Siuzdak G. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 3698–3703, 2009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812874106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lamichhane S, Sen P, Dickens AM, Orešič M, Bertram HC. Gut metabolome meets microbiome: a methodological perspective to understand the relationship between host and microbe. Methods 149: 3–12, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Szwergold BS, Miller CB. Potential of birds to serve as a pathology-free model of type 2 diabetes, part 1: is the apparent absence of the RAGE gene a factor in the resistance of avian organisms to chronic hyperglycemia? Rejuvenation Res 17: 54–61, 2014. doi: 10.1089/rej.2013.1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Braun EJ, Sweazea KL. Glucose regulation in birds. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 151: 1–9, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bundle MW, Hansen KS, Dial KP. Does the metabolic rate–flight speed relationship vary among geometrically similar birds of different mass? J Exp Biol 210: 1075–1083, 2007. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Landys MM, Piersma T, Guglielmo CG, Jukema J, Ramenofsky M, Wingfield JC. Metabolic profile of long-distance migratory flight and stopover in a shorebird. Proc Biol Sci 272: 295–302, 2005. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Herman MA, Kahn BB. Glucose transport and sensing in the maintenance of glucose homeostasis and metabolic harmony. J Clin Invest 116: 1767–1775, 2006. doi: 10.1172/jci29027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Basile AJ, Jasbi P, Clark W, Shi X, Gu H, Deviche P, Sweazea KL. A four-week white bread diet does not alter plasma glucose concentrations, metabolic or vascular physiology in mourning doves, Zenaida macroura. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 247: 110718, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Basile AJ, Mohr AE, Jasbi P, Gu H, Deviche P, Sweazea KL. A four-week high fat diet does not alter plasma glucose or metabolic physiology in wild-caught mourning doves (Zenaida macroura). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 251: 110820, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gadau A, Crawford MS, Mayek R, Giraudeau M, McGraw KJ, Whisner CM, Kondrat-Smith C, Sweazea KL. A comparison of the nutritional physiology and gut microbiome of urban and rural house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 237: 110332, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2019.110332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Basile AJ, Renner MW, Kayata L, Deviche P, Sweazea KL. A four-week urban diet impairs vasodilation but not nutritional physiology in wild-caught mourning doves (Zenaida macroura). Physiol Biochem Zool 94: 241–252, 2021. doi: 10.1086/714831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Teyssier A, Rouffaer LO, Hudin NS, Strubbe D, Matthysen E, Lens L, White J. Inside the guts of the city: urban-induced alterations of the gut microbiota in a wild passerine. Sci Total Environ 612: 1276–1286, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Murray MH, Lankau EW, Kidd AD, Welch CN, Ellison T, Adams HC, Lipp EK, Hernandez SM. Gut microbiome shifts with urbanization and potentially facilitates a zoonotic pathogen in a wading bird. Plos One 15: e0220926, 2020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Teyssier A, Matthysen E, Hudin NS, de Neve L, White J, Lens L. Diet contributes to urban-induced alterations in gut microbiota: experimental evidence from a wild passerine. Proc Biol Sci 287: 20192182, 2020. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Berlow M, Phillips JN, Derryberry EP. Effects of urbanization and landscape on gut microbiomes in white-crowned sparrows. Microb Ecol 81: 253–266, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01569-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kohl KD. Diversity and function of the avian gut microbiota. J Comp Physiol B 182: 591–602, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00360-012-0645-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hird SM, Sánchez C, Carstens BC, Brumfield RT. Comparative gut microbiota of 59 neotropical bird species. Front Microbiol 6: 1403, 2015. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Song SJ, Sanders JG, Delsuc F, Metcalf J, Amato K, Taylor MW, Mazel F, Lutz HL, Winker K, Graves GR, Humphrey G, Gilbert JA, Hackett SJ, White KP, Skeen HR, Kurtis SM, Withrow J, Braile T, Miller M, McCracken KG, Maley JM, Ezenwa VO, Williams A, Blanton JM, McKenzie VJ, Knight R. Comparative analyses of vertebrate gut microbiomes reveal convergence between birds and bats. Mbio 11: e02901-19, 2020. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02901-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Stofberg M, Cunningham SJ, Sumasgutner P, Amar A. Juggling a “junk-food” diet: responses of an urban bird to fluctuating anthropogenic-food availability. Urban Ecosyst 22: 1019–1026, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11252-019-00885-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Videvall E, Strandh M, Engelbrecht A, Cloete S, Cornwallis CK. Measuring the gut microbiome in birds: Comparison of faecal and cloacal sampling. Mol Ecol Resour 18: 424–434, 2018. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 4516–4522, 2011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37: 852–857, 2019. [Erratum in Nat Biotechnol 37: 1091, 2019]. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13: 581–583, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, Huttley GA, Caporaso JG. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6: 90, 2018. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. Plos Comput Biol 10: e1003531, 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Martino C, Morton JT, Marotz CA, Thompson LR, Tripathi A, Knight R, Zengler K. A novel sparse compositional technique reveals microbial perturbations. Msystems 4: e00016-19, 2019. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00016-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, Huttenhower C, Langille MGI. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol 38: 685–688, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Caspi R, Billington R, Ferrer L, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Mueller LA, Ong Q, Paley S, Subhraveti P, Weaver DS, Karp PD. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 44: D471–D480, 2016. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Rosa PSL, Brooks JP, Deych E, Boone EL, Edwards DJ, Wang Q, Sodergren E, Weinstock G, Shannon WD. Hypothesis testing and power calculations for taxonomic-based human microbiome data. Plos One 7: e52078, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lin H, Peddada SD. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun 11: 3514, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Xia J, Sinelnikov IV, Han B, Wishart DS. MetaboAnalyst 3.0—making metabolomics more meaningful. Nucleic Acids Res 43: W251–W257, 2015. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Rizzatti G, Lopetuso LR, Gibiino G, Binda C, Gasbarrini A. Proteobacteria: a common factor in human diseases. Biomed Res Int 2017: 9351507, 2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/9351507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. García-Amado MA, Shin H, Sanz V, Lentino M, Martínez LM, Contreras M, Michelangeli F, Domínguez-Bello MG. Comparison of gizzard and intestinal microbiota of wild neotropical birds. Plos One 13: e0194857, 2018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bodawatta KH, Freiberga I, Puzejova K, Sam K, Poulsen M, Jønsson KA. Flexibility and resilience of great tit (Parus major) gut microbiomes to changing diets. Anim Microbiome 3: 20, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00076-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Liu C, Zhang J, Li M, Zhao L, Ji C, Ma Q. Alterations and structural resilience of the gut microbiota under dietary fat perturbations. J Nutr Biochem 61: 91–100, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Mohr AE, Gumpricht E, Sears DD, Sweazea KL. Recent advances and health implications of dietary fasting regimens on the gut microbiome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 320: G847–G863, 2021. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00475.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bodawatta KH, Hird SM, Grond K, Poulsen M, Jønsson KA. Avian gut microbiomes taking flight. Trends Microbiol 30: 268–280, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2021.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hao Y, Ji Z, Shen Z, Xue Y, Zhang B, Yu D, Liu T, Luo D, Xing G, Tang J, Hou S, Xie M. Increase dietary fiber intake ameliorates cecal morphology and drives cecal species-specific of short-chain fatty acids in white Pekin ducks. Front Microbiol 13: 853797, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.853797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Angelakis E, Armougom F, Carrière F, Bachar D, Laugier R, Lagier J-C, Robert C, Michelle C, Henrissat B, Raoult D. A metagenomic investigation of the duodenal microbiota reveals links with obesity. Plos One 10: e0137784, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wang W, Wang F, Li L, Wang A, Sharshov K, Druzyaka A, Lancuo Z, Wang S, Shi Y. Characterization of the gut microbiome of black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) in six wintering areas in China. Arch Microbiol 202: 983–993, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01802-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Gonçalves Pessoa RB, de Oliveira WF, Marques DSC, Dos Santos Correia MT, de Carvalho EVMM, Coelho LCBB. The genus Aeromonas: a general approach. Microb Pathog 130: 81–94, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cardoso MD, Lemos LS, Roges EM, Moura JF, Tavares DC, Matias CAR, Rodrigues DP, Siciliano S. A comprehensive survey of Aeromonas sp. and Vibrio sp. in seabirds from southeastern Brazil: outcomes for public health. J Appl Microbiol 124: 1283–1293, 2018. doi: 10.1111/jam.13705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Stenkat J, Krautwald‐Junghanns M‐E, Ornés AS, Eilers A, Schmidt V. Aerobic cloacal and pharyngeal bacterial flora in six species of free‐living birds. J Appl Microbiol 117: 1564–1571, 2014. doi: 10.1111/jam.12636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Narasinakuppe Krishnegowda D, Dhama K, Kumar Mariappan A, Munuswamy P, Iqbal Yatoo M, Tiwari R, Karthik K, Bhatt P, Reddy MR. Etiology, epidemiology, pathology, and advances in diagnosis, vaccine development, and treatment of Gallibacterium anatis infection in poultry: a review. Vet Q 40: 16–34, 2020. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2020.1712495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Slevin MC, Houtz JL, Bradshaw DJ, Anderson RC. Evidence supporting the microbiota–gut–brain axis in a songbird. Biol Lett 16: 20200430, 2020. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Hammer TJ, Sanders JG, Fierer N. Not all animals need a microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366: fnz117, 2019. [Erratum in FEMS Microbiol Lett 369: fnac058, 2022]. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Youngblut ND, Reischer GH, Walters W, Schuster N, Walzer C, Stalder G, Ley RE, Farnleitner AH. Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades. Nat Commun 10: 2200, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10191-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Xi Y, Yan J, Li M, Ying S, Shi Z. Gut microbiota dysbiosis increases the risk of visceral gout in goslings through translocation of gut-derived lipopolysaccharide. Poult Sci 98: 5361–5373, 2019. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Samuel G, Reeves P. Biosynthesis of O-antigens: genes and pathways involved in nucleotide sugar precursor synthesis and O-antigen assembly. Carbohydr Res 338: 2503–2519, 2003. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2003.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Dorokhov YL, Shindyapina AV, Sheshukova EV, Komarova TV. Metabolic methanol: molecular pathways and physiological roles. Physiol Rev 95: 603–644, 2015. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gonzalez-Uarquin F, Rodehutscord M, Huber K. Myo-inositol: its metabolism and potential implications for poultry nutrition—a review. Poult Sci 99: 893–905, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Croze ML, Soulage CO. Potential role and therapeutic interests of myo-inositol in metabolic diseases. Biochimie 95: 1811–1827, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental Figs. S1 and S2 and Supplemental Tables S1–S3: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20084090.
Data Availability Statement
Raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing data for all samples have been deposited in the open-source repository, Sequence Read Archive (SRA), under the NCBI BioProject number, PRJNA849645 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra).
