Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;25(10):105037. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105037

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Statistical comparison between six of upper-limb muscles during TSS delivered along the mediolateral axes

(A) Averaged data of the MT intensity at rostral mediolateral stimulation sites (see also Table S3).

(B) Averaged data of the MT at caudal mediolateral stimulation sites (see also Table S3).

(C) Averaged data of the MaxR at rostral mediolateral stimulation sites.

(D) Averaged data of the MaxR at caudal mediolateral stimulation sites.

(E) Averaged data of the R2/R1 ratio at rostral mediolateral stimulation sites.

(F) Averaged data of the R2/R1 ratio at caudal mediolateral stimulation sites. Box range was set as percentage 25%–75%, bold horizontal red lines in boxplots present the median values, and whiskers indicate the 95% confidence interval. A post-hoc Holm-Bonferroni correction was carried out for multiple comparison within figures. Significant differences are indicated with horizontal lines. Dotted lines: p < 0.05; dashed lines: p < 0.01; and solid lines: p < 0.001. Rostral mediolateral stimulation sites include EL01, EL02, EL03, EL4, and EL05; caudal mediolateral stimulation sites include EL09, EL10, EL11, EL12, and EL13. TSS: transcutaneous spinal stimulation, BIC: biceps brachii; TRIC: triceps brachii; FCR: flexor carpi radialis; ECR: extensor carpi radialis; APB: abductor pollicis brevis; ADM: abductor digiti minimi.