Skip to main content
JAAD International logoLink to JAAD International
editorial
. 2022 Aug 18;9:48–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.08.005

Microneedling in the nickel-allergic patient

Shae Margulies a, Arthur M Samia b, Marjorie Montañez-Wiscovich b, Sami K Saikaly b,
PMCID: PMC9486107  PMID: 36147214

Microneedling uses sterilized microneedles to repetitively puncture the skin, inducing a wound-healing cascade, which may improve skin appearance.1 Currently, there are no guidelines regarding prescreening for nickel allergy in patients who undergo microneedling but endorse a possible history of metal allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Nickel is the most prevalent trigger for ACD, affecting both men and women. Here we present a commentary on the currently available literature regarding nickel ACD and microneedling.

Although microneedling has gained popularity in recent years, metal ACD to microneedles is rarely reported. Microneedling devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration contain needles commonly composed of surgical stainless steel (SS). SS contains varying amounts of nickel, depending on the grade.1 Specifically, the authors’ microneedling device is composed of 316L alloy (Table I), containing 10% to 14% nickel.1 Although some devices have titanium-coated needle tips, it is unclear if there is sufficient nickel exposure to induce ACD in sensitized individuals. When testing the microneedling tips of the SkinPen Precision system (Crown Aesthetics) with 2 dimethylglyoxime tests (Nickel Alert [Athena Allergy] and Chemo Nickel Test [Chemotechnique Diagnostics]), twice each, negative results were noted (Fig 1). Additionally, used microneedles were similarly tested to consider the possibility of microneedle breakdown; however, these tests were negative both times. In contrast, a nickel-containing US minted nickel, used as positive control, tested positive.

Table I.

Stainless steel composition of medical grade instruments

Stainless steel grade Composition
304 Iron + carbon, 18%-20% chromium, 8%-12% nickel
316 Iron + carbon, 16%-18% chromium, 10%-14% nickel, 2%-3% molybdenum
409 Iron + carbon, 10.5%-11.75% chromium, 0.5% nickel
410 Iron + carbon, 11.5%-13.5% chromium, 0.75% nickel
420 Iron + carbon, 12%-14% chromium, 0% nickel
430 Iron + carbon, 16%-18% chromium, 0%-0.75% nickel
440 Iron + carbon, 16%-18% chromium, 0% nickel

Adapted from Boyd and Hylwa.1

Stainless steel found in the microneedles used by authors.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Microneedling tip with negative reaction using 2 dimethylglyoxime tests, twice each.

A PubMed literature search for the terms “microneedle,” “allergy,” “allergic contact dermatitis,” and “nickel allergy” was performed, revealing 1 report of skin eruption 6 days after microneedling with a Dermaroller device (Derma India) containing titanium-coated tips of stainless steel needles. Patch testing later revealed a positive nickel reaction.2 However, this study was limited in that there was no allergy testing to utilized local anesthetics or antiseptics. Similarly, 2 cases of ACD have been reported after exposure to nickel-containing hypodermic needles.3 In a test of SS ear piercings, SS (316L alloy) was found to release nickel at a rate of <0.05 μg/cm2/wk and did not elicit ACD in patients with a known nickel allergy.4 As it pertains to microneedles, it is unclear if nickel ions are released with use. Our testing of the SkinPen Precision system suggests either a true negative or that the percentage of nickel is too low to detect with dimethylglyoxime testing, which is only 59.3% sensitive.5

Given the high prevalence of nickel ACD, a screening question may be of benefit during cosmetic consultations. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to make discrete recommendations given the scarcity of relevant literature investigating this subject. Another approach may be to perform microneedling test spots in patients with patch test-proven nickel allergy to assess whether a cutaneous reaction occurs, though further research is needed.

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.

Footnotes

Funding sources: None.

IRB approval status: Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Boyd A.H., Hylwa S.A. Nickel release from surgical instruments and operating room equipment. Dermatol Online J. 2018;24(4) 13030/qt88q6q97w. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yadav S., Dogra S. A cutaneous reaction to microneedling for postacne scarring caused by nickel hypersensitivity. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(4):NP168–NP170. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mehta V., Vasanth V., Balachandran C. Nickel contact dermatitis from hypodermic needles. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56(2):237–238. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.80438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ingber A., Hershko K., Horev L. AISI 316L stainless-steel ear piercing post assembly does not cause dermatitis in nickel-sensitive subjects. Exog Dermatol. 2003;2:195–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thyssen J.P., Skare L., Lundgren L., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the nickel spot (dimethylglyoxime) test. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62(5):279–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAD International are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES