Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;9:977403. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.977403

Table 4.

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for NAFLD based on tertiles of nutrient patterns.

Tertiles of nutrient patterns P for trend
T1 T2 T3
Nutrient pattern 1
Median score −0.96 −0.12 0.90
NAFLD /control 78 / 147 78 / 147 69 / 156
Model 1* 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (0.68–1.47) 0.85 (0.57–1.26) 0.395
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.88 (0.50–1.52) 0.77 (0.45–1.34) 0.361
Nutrient pattern 2
Median score −0.92 −0.09 0.81
NAFLD /control 71 / 155 71 / 153 83 / 142
Model 1* 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (0.67–1.48) 1.24 (0.84–1.84) 0.240
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.88 (0.51–1.53) 1.04 (0.60–1.81) 0.780
Nutrient pattern 3
Median score −0.85 −0.16 0.80
NAFLD /control 68 / 157 80 / 145 77 / 148
Model 1* 1.00 (Ref) 1.25 (0.84–1.86) 1.16 (0.78–1.73) 0.529
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 1.29 (0.74–2.25) 1.17 (0.67–2.04) 0.649
Nutrient pattern 4
Median score −0.96 −0.13 0.99
NAFLD /control 76 / 150 83 / 150 66 / 150
Model 1* 1.00 (Ref) 1.08 (0.73–1.59) 0.86 (0.57–1.28) 0.412
Model 2 1.00 (Ref) 0.87 (0.50–1.49) 0.56 (0.32–0.98) 0.042
*

Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex.

Model 2: Additionally adjusted for model 1 and BMI, physical activity, smoking, SES, dietary intake of energy.