Table 6. Quantitative comparisons of different RGC counting methods for test images.
Manual marking | Dordea et al. method |
Cross et al. method | Masin el al. method |
Our method |
|
RGCs-N1 | 36 468 | 48 934 (34.1%) | 31 321 (14.1%) | 31 671 (13.1%) | 37 516 (2.97%) |
RGCs-N2 | 43 473 | 45 989 (5.79%) | 30 617 (29.5%) | 40 800 (6.15%) | 43 244 (0.53%) |
RGCs-D1 | 4 418 | 7 160 (62.0%) | 8 240 (86.5%) | 3 953 (10.5%) | 4 279 (3.14%) |