Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 18;84:104269. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104269

Table 3.

Logistic regression models for acute erythema (0/1).

Non-SNP model + rs2087947 C/T (PER3)
(fixed effects)
+ rs2087947 C/T (PER3)
(random effects)
BMI 1.04 (1.02 – 1.07)
P = 0.0005
1.04 (1.02 – 1.07)
P = 0.0006
1.05 (1.03 – 1.08)
P < 0.0001
Biological equivalent dose to breast (BED) (Gy) 1.02 (1.01 – 1.03)
P = 0.0004
1.02 (1.01 – 1.03)
P = 0.0005
1.02 (1.01 – 1.04)
P = 0.003
Mean treatment time (hours from solar midnight) 1.05 (0.999 – 1.1)
P = 0.05
1.05 (1 – 1.1)
P = 0.043
1.02 (0.966 – 1.07)
P = 0.49
Standard deviation of treatment times (solar time) 0.64 (0.491 – 0.832)
P = 0.0009
0.645 (0.495 – 0.839)
P = 0.001
0.812 (0.545 – 1.08)
P = 0.2
rs2087947 (dosage, T allele) 1.27 (1.03 – 1.56)
P = 0.024
1.27 (1 – 1.54)
P = 0.027
(Random Effect)
Treatment centre
stdev:__(Intercept)
0.59
N 1198 1198 1198
ROC AUC (95% CI) a 0.61 (0.55–0.67) 0.62 (0.56–0.68)
AIC 1,244 1,241 1,203

Logistic regression. Statistics shown: odds ratio (95% CI).

a

see Supplementary Figure 1.