Table 2.
Comparison of the change in body fat and hemodynamic parameters after exercise.
| Comparison Among Different Groups |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIIT | MICT | P | η2 | HIIT | CON | P | η2 | MICT | CON | P | η2 | |
| Visceral Fat Indices Measurement and Calculation | ||||||||||||
| LAP | 29.83 ± 2.84 | 25.59 ± 3.10 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 32.10 ± 4.27 | 55.18 ± 7.22 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 23.23 ± 4.82 | 51.46 ± 7.58 | 0.01 | 0.32 |
| VAI | 1.10 ± 0.09 | 1.03 ± 0.10 | 0.63 | 0.01 | 1.17 ± 0.12 | 1.84 ± 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 1.79 ± 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| Carotid Hemodynamic Parameters | ||||||||||||
| BV (m/s) | 0.29 ± 0.10 | 0.27 ± 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.28 |
| AD (cm) | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.03 |
| BP (kPa) | 12.57 ± 0.23 | 12.98 ± 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 12.85 ± 0.21 | 12.90 ± 0.32 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 12.73 ± 0.23 | 12.56 ± 0.35 | 0.69 | 0.01 |
| WSS (Pa) | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.23 |
| FR | 3.84 ± 0.23 | 3.87 ± 0.22 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 3.87 ± 0.17 | 3.53 ± 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 3.79 ± 0.24 | 3.40 ± 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.03 |
| OSI | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.07 |
| EM (kPa) | 46.40 ± 3.22 | 46.48 ± 3.13 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 48.38 ± 2.79 | 54.44 ± 4.18 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 46.21 ± 3.86 | 52.07 ± 6.12 | 0.44 | 0.02 |
| AS | 3.24 ± 0.24 | 3.57 ± 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 3.30 ± 0.20 | 4.14 ± 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 3.56 ± 0.29 | 4.10 ± 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.04 |
| DR (Pa·s·m−1) | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 1.03 ± 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| Rq (Pa·s ·m−3) | 23.84 ± 1.46 | 23.79 ± 1.50 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 24.09 ± 1.34 | 27.19 ± 2.08 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 24.45 ± 1.69 | 28.10 ± 2.49 | 0.24 | 0.05 |
| CS | 0.13 ± 0.007 | 0.12 ± 0.006 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.01 |
| PI | 1.84 ± 0.06 | 1.91 ± 0.06 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 1.87 ± 0.07 | 1.99 ± 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 1.90 ± 0.06 | 1.97 ± 0.11 | 0.56 | 0.01 |
Note: One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare the change of different groups on the lipid accumulation index and carotid hemodynamic parameters. The data in Table 2 were adjusted value based on baseline level as covariable; outcome variables are shown as the means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance was set at an alpha level of 95% (p < 0.05) for all statistical measures. Partial η2 value for effect size.
LAP: lipid accumulation product, VAI: visceral adiposity index, BV: blood velocity, AD: artery diameter, BP: blood pressure, WSS: wall shear stress, FR: flow rate, OSI: oscillatory shear index, EM: elasticity modulus, AS: arterial stiffness, DR: dynamic resistance, Rq: peripheral resistance, CS: circumferential strain, PI: pulsatility index.