Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2022 Apr 2;130(3):ix–xi. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac040

Cycads defy expectations for the coordination between drought and mechanical resistance. A commentary on: ‘Correlations between leaf economics, mechanical resistance and drought tolerance across 41 cycad species’

Megan K Bartlett 1,
PMCID: PMC9486914  PMID: 35366305

Abstract

This article comments on:

Yi-Yi Meng, Wei Xiang, Yin Wen, Dong-Liu Huang, Kun-Fang Cao, and Shi-Dan Zhu, Correlations between leaf economics, mechanical resistance and drought tolerance across 41 cycad species, Annals of Botany, Volume 130, Issue 3, 1 September 2022, Pages 345–354 https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab146

Keywords: Cycads, mechanical resistance, drought tolerance


The leaf economics spectrum is one of the few organizing principles in plant ecology. Across thousands of species from biomes worldwide, correlations among leaf structural, chemical and physiological traits constrain trait variation to a single axis (Wright et al., 2004). Along this axis, leaf syndromes range from ‘fast’, with traits that facilitate resource acquisition and growth (e.g. a high nitrogen content and maximum photosynthetic rate), to ‘slow’, with traits that conserve resources and support leaf persistence (e.g. high structural investment and mechanical strength) (Onoda et al., 2011; Reich, 2014). The physiological trade-offs that generate the leaf economics spectrum have been hypothesized to mechanistically link these traits to other stress resistance syndromes, which would integrate an even wider range of ecological and evolutionary strategies into a single, universal spectrum (Hallik et al., 2009; Reich, 2014; Nadal et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018). However, other findings have challenged this view (Bartlett et al., 2012; Maréchaux et al., 2020), and raised questions about how and why coordination between leaf traits varies across the plant kingdom (Mason and Donovan, 2015; Fletcher et al., 2018). In this issue of Annals of Botany, Meng et al. (2022) test whether the same relationships between the leaf economics spectrum and drought tolerance apply to phylogenetically diverse angiosperms and a clade of closely related gymnosperms, cycads. They show that cycads exhibit new and, initially, counterintuitive relationships between drought and mechanical resistance that are the opposite from angiosperms, allowing these taxa to use different strategies to diversify across similar climatic gradients.

Drought tolerance has been hypothesized to be a part of a ‘slow’, persistent strategy (Reich, 2014). Meng et al. measured drought tolerance as the leaf turgor loss point (π tlp), or the water potential at which the cells lose turgor pressure and cell walls collapse (Cheung et al., 1975). Turgor loss disrupts water transport and gas exchange and causes the leaves to wilt (Brodribb et al., 2003; Scoffoni et al., 2017). A more negative π tlp indicates greater drought tolerance since turgor loss occurs at a more negative water potential. π tlp is determined by the cell solute concentration, but, across species, a more negative π tlp is generally correlated with greater cell wall stiffness (i.e. a higher modulus of elasticity, ε) (Bartlett et al., 2012). Stiffer walls help maintain cell hydration by providing structural resistance to the changes in cell volume required for water loss (Cheung et al., 1975; Bartlett et al., 2012). This relationship to ε has been hypothesized to link π tlp to the leaf economics spectrum (Salleo and Nardini, 2000; Nadal et al., 2018), since stiffer cell walls are expected to be thicker, and modelling analyses suggest wall thickness is a major driver of the economics spectrum traits (John et al., 2017; Onoda et al., 2017). Increasing wall thickness would increase the leaf dry mass per area (LMA), which increases the mechanical strength of the leaves and, thus, leaf lifespan (Wright et al., 2004; Onoda et al., 2011). However, increasing wall thickness would also reduce the leaf nitrogen content, and potentially impede mesophyll conductance, both of which would reduce the maximum photosynthetic rate (Onoda et al., 2017; Nadal et al., 2018). Together, these relationships would generate the trade-offs between resource acquisition and persistence traits that define the leaf economics spectrum and link this spectrum to π tlp. Mechanical resistance would thus be a fundamental adaptation to dry environments (Salleo and Nardini, 2000; Reich, 2014).

However, support for this hypothesis has been mixed. ε was found to correlate with leaf density (Niinemets, 2001) and cell wall thickness (Peguero-Pina et al., 2017), but not specific leaf area (LMA−1) (Salleo and Nardini, 2000). A more negative π tlp and ‘slow’ economics traits were both correlated (Zhu et al., 2018) and unrelated (Bartlett et al., 2012) across phylogenetically diverse angiosperms from a wide range of ecosystems. π tlp and economics spectrum traits were also unrelated across co-occurring species from tropical ecosystems (Rosas et al., 2019; Maréchaux et al., 2020) and across a clade of closely related Mediterranean species (Fletcher et al., 2018). Overall, the consensus has been that π tlp can be functionally decoupled from the economics spectrum traits, potentially because different tissues govern leaf hydraulics and photosynthesis (Li et al., 2015), while the correlations observed across species from different ecosystems reflect selection for both resource conservation and drought tolerance by drier environments (Salleo and Nardini, 2000; Nardini, 2022).

Meng and co-workers provide an interesting new perspective on these relationships by showing that drought and mechanical resistance can be negatively correlated, and that strong selection for economics spectrum traits can generate seemingly counterintuitive associations between a higher π tlp and drier environments. The authors measured leaf structure, nutrient content, gas exchange, mechanical strength, construction costs and π tlp for 41 cycad species in a common garden. Previous studies have characterized relationships between the leaf economics spectrum traits in cycads (e.g. Zhang et al., 2015; Marler and Lindström, 2018), and this study extends these findings to mechanics, construction costs and drought tolerance. The authors compared trait correlations across the cycads and woody angiosperm species from similar ecosystems, and tested trait relationships with climate in the cycads’ native geographical ranges, to evaluate which traits drove the diversification of the Zamiaceae species from the more primitive Cycadaceae. Across the cycads, greater drought tolerance was significantly associated with thinner leaves, less mechanical toughness and lower construction costs, while these correlations were significant in the opposite direction for the angiosperms. Further, the Zamiaceae diversified into drier environments by increasing leaf thickness, and, unexpectedly, π tlp, since these traits were positively correlated. Few studies have compared the role of different leaf traits in species diversification, but these results are contrary to findings for Mediterranean woody shrubs, where the subgenus Cerastes diversified from Ceanothus into drier environments by evolving more negative π tlp, independently of the economics spectrum traits (Fletcher et al., 2018).

Meng et al. suggest that these seemingly counterintuitive results reflect selection for greater succulence in the Zamiaceae. They found that thicker leaves contained a larger cross-section of accessory transfusion tissue (Fig. 1). Transfusion tissue is a universal structure in gymnosperms, while accessory transfusion tissue, which extends between the palisade and spongy mesophyll, is unique to cycads and some Podocarpus species (Hu and Yao, 1981). Transfusion tissue is involved in water transport and storage, suggesting thicker cycad leaves contain more dilute, readily water-releasing cells, which would increase π tlp. Consistent with this hypothesis, succulence also increased π tlp in angiosperms (Leverett et al., 2021). Interestingly, in Taxus, water stress induced a reversible collapse in the transfusion tissues that acted as a ‘circuit-breaker’ to stop transpiration before the xylem embolized, analogous to the role of declines in extraxylary conductance in angiosperm leaves (Zhang et al., 2016; Scoffoni et al., 2017). Thus, more vulnerable transfusion tissues could potentially help the Zamiaceae avoid embolism in drier environments.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Representative leaf cross-sections for a Cycadaceae species, Cycas hainanensis (A), and a Zamiaceae species, Encephalartos ferox (B). Red arrows indicate accessory transfusion tissue. The thicker leaves in the Zamiaceae contain more accessory transfusion tissue, which is important to water transport and storage. Note the differences in scale between A and B. Images provided by the authors of Meng et al. (2022).

Altogether, Meng and co-workers show that cycads have fundamentally different patterns in trait coordination and adaptations to dry environments than co-occurring angiosperms, indicating the relationship between drought and mechanical resistance is more complex than a single, universal spectrum across plants. Their findings also highlight the need for more studies within closely related clades to understand the evolutionary drivers of trait coordination.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L. 2012. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 15: 393–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ, Gutierrez MV. 2003. Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 443–450. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheung YNS, Tyree MT, Dainty J. 1975. Water relations parameters on single leaves obtained in a pressure bomb and some ecological interpretations. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 1342–1346. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fletcher LR, Cui H, Callahan H, et al. 2018. Evolution of leaf structure and drought tolerance in species of Californian Ceanothus. American Journal of Botany 105: 1672–1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hallik L, Ü N, Wright IJ. 2009. Are species shade and drought tolerance reflected in leaf-level structural and functional differentiation in Northern Hemisphere temperate woody flora? New Phytologist 184: 257–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu Y-S, Yao B-J. 1981. Transfusion tissue in gymnosperm leaves. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 263–272. [Google Scholar]
  7. John GP, Scoffoni C, Buckley TN, Villar R, Poorter H, Sack L. 2017. The anatomical and compositional basis of leaf mass per area. Ecology Letters 20: 412–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leverett A, Hurtado Castaño N, Ferguson K, Winter K, Borland AM. 2021. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) supersedes the turgor loss point (TLP) as an important adaptation across a precipitation gradient, in the genus Clusia. Functional Plant Biology 48: 703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li L, McCormack ML, Ma C, et al. 2015. Leaf economics and hydraulic traits are decoupled in five species-rich tropical–subtropical forests. Ecology Letters 18: 899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maréchaux I, Saint-André L, Bartlett MK, Sack L, Chave J. 2020. Leaf drought tolerance cannot be inferred from classic leaf traits in a tropical rainforest. Journal of Ecology 108: 1030–1045. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marler TE, Lindström AJ. 2018. Inserting cycads into global nutrient relations data sets. Plant Signaling & Behavior 13: e1547578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mason CM, Donovan LA. 2015. Evolution of the leaf economics spectrum in herbs: Evidence from environmental divergences in leaf physiology across Helianthus (Asteraceae). Evolution 69: 2705–2720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meng Y-Y, Xiang W, Wen Y, Huang D-L, Cao K-F, Zhu S-D. 2022. Correlations between leaf economics, mechanical resistance and drought tolerance across 41 cycad species. Annals of Botany 130: 367–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nadal M, Flexas J, Gulías J. 2018. Possible link between photosynthesis and leaf modulus of elasticity among vascular plants: a new player in leaf traits relationships? Ecology Letters 21: 1372–1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nardini A. 2022. Hard and tough: the coordination between leaf mechanical resistance and drought tolerance. Flora 288: 152023. [Google Scholar]
  16. Niinemets U. 2001. Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82: 453–469. [Google Scholar]
  17. Onoda Y, Westoby M, Adler PB, et al. 2011. Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties. Ecology Letters 14: 301–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Onoda Y, Wright IJ, Evans JR, et al. 2017. Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum. New Phytologist 214: 1447–1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peguero-Pina JJ, Sancho-Knapik D, Gil-Pelegrín E. 2017. Ancient cell structural traits and photosynthesis in today’s environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 68: 1389–1392. [Google Scholar]
  20. Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275–301. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosas T, Mencuccini M, Barba J, Cochard H, Saura-Mas S, Martínez-Vilalta J. 2019. Adjustments and coordination of hydraulic, leaf and stem traits along a water availability gradient. New Phytologist 223: 632–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salleo S, Nardini A. 2000. Sclerophylly: evolutionary advantage or mere epiphenomenon? Plant Biosystems 134: 247–259. [Google Scholar]
  23. Scoffoni C, Albuquerque C, Brodersen CR, et al. 2017. Outside-xylem vulnerability, not xylem embolism, controls leaf hydraulic decline during dehydration. Plant Physiology 173: 1197–1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang Y, Cao K, Sack L, Li N, Wei X, Goldstein G. 2015. Extending the generality of leaf economic design principles in the cycads, an ancient lineage. New Phytologist 206: 817–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang Y-J, Rockwell FE, Graham AC, Alexander T, Holbrook NM. 2016. Reversible leaf xylem collapse: a potential ‘circuit breaker’ against cavitation. Plant Physiology 172: 2261–2274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu S-D, Chen Y-J, Ye Q, et al. 2018. Leaf turgor loss point is correlated with drought tolerance and leaf carbon economics traits. Tree Physiology 38: 658–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES