Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Feb 22;96(3):445–453. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.018

TABLE 5.

Univariate analysis with discrete time hazard model on recurrence

Factor Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) P value
Submucosal invasion, ≥500 μm vs <500 μm NA NA

Lymphovascular invasion, yes vs no .95 (.12–7.76) .96

Histologic grade G2 (moderately differentiated) vs G1 (well differentiated) 3.386 (.33–34.49) .30

Histologic grade G3 (poorly differentiated) vs G1 (well differentiated) 5.505 (.43–70.66) .19

Did the patient receive the recommended follow-up radiofrequency ablation? yes vs no NA NA

Preoperative maximal diameter of the lesion (1-unit increment) .97 (.92–1.03) .31

Maximal length of largest specimen (mm) (1-unit increment) .97 (.93–1.02) .215

Histology of resected specimen, squamous cell carcinoma vs adenocarcinoma .654 (.151–2.835) .57

R0 resection, yes vs no .16 (.03–.78) .023

R1 resection, yes vs no 6.253 (1.29–30.36) .023

Adjuvant chemotherapy, yes vs no 2.475 (.657–9.323) .181

Adjuvant radiotherapy, yes vs no 1.576 (.422–5.887) .499

Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, yes vs no 2.326 (.581–9.315] .233

NA, not applicable.