Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;17(9):e0274835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274835

Fig 2. Relationship between 14C dating of the Thera eruption and IntCal20 14C calibration curve taphonomy [41].

Fig 2

(A) Calibrated calendar age probabilities (no modelling) using OxCal 4.4.4 [57] for 14C ages drawn from IntCal20 itself for calendar dates 1630, 1610, 1585, 1560, and 1530 BCE illustrate how ages around especially 1610–1530 BCE spread across the reversal-plateau in the calibration curve ~1620–1540 BCE [41] (see Materials and methods below). The only clarity is that ages ≥1630 BCE or ≤1530 BCE may be distinguished from those in between. A stated average 14C age for the Thera eruption [43] is shown at 1σ and 2σ by the yellow bars, intersecting with the calibration curve at multiple places from the early 17th century BCE to mid-16th century BCE. (B) The calibrated calendar age probabilities of each of the 14C dates in S1A Table (numbers 1–110) employed as relevant to the Thera date showing how the dating probabilities for the vast majority spread across the 17th to 16th centuries BCE given the calibration curve shape.